Intel’s Haswell to Feature Secrete Weapon: Integrated Voltage Regulator

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
15,431
7,849
136
Secret-weapon, we've known about this for some time? Oh, parroting Xbitlab's sensationalist article :p
 

IntelUser2000

Elite Member
Oct 14, 2003
8,686
3,785
136
I can only see this as something that can potentially limit the ability to overvolt and overcurrent the procs if they so choose.

Shouldn't worry about this. They wouldn't provide overclockable K SKUs and mainboards with multitudes of overclocking options in the BIOS if they wanted to.

The fact is, even if significant amount of people overclocking resulted in less desktop sales, its an increasingly smaller market for them. They would do well to appease the enthusiast in that case, the only one where they said outside of the AIO and SFF market is a growing one for desktop.

Also, if each power cell really supports 25A, and there's twenty of them, its highly unlikely you'll be limited by that aspect either.
 

IntelUser2000

Elite Member
Oct 14, 2003
8,686
3,785
136
Made a false assumption based on Xbitlabs' misleading understanding of PCWatch's article.

The specific device that handles 25A and 16 phases per cell is a research chip. No known details for Haswell's FiVR exist.

I think what "Fully Integrated" refers is that the single die is capable of handling multiple voltage rails.

As for the version shown in Xbitlabs: They say that only 3 cells active are needed to fully power a 90W Xeon without problems. 20 cells indicate 500A, and if they integrate a derivative of that, there's no way you'd run out of power headroom because of the current "limitations". Also, having much higher phases would allow stability, potentially increasing overclocking potential.

320 phases is 20x what high end motherboards have.

Fixed typo.
 
Last edited:

StrangerGuy

Diamond Member
May 9, 2004
8,443
124
106
So no mobo manufacturer has no chance to skimp on the VRM or hype their over 9000 phases digital VRM marketing hot air? I approve.
 

Haserath

Senior member
Sep 12, 2010
793
1
81
More phases on a mobo generally used more power for no noticeable gain. I'd be glad if Intel controlled efficiency on that.

They'll most likely make everything better. It will be more difficult for the industry but better for us.
 

Homeles

Platinum Member
Dec 9, 2011
2,580
0
0
Secret-weapon, we've known about this for some time? Oh, parroting Xbitlab's sensationalist article :p
We didn't know we'd be getting a high quality chip like this.

Edit: well, I guess that's still up in the air.
 

cbn

Lifer
Mar 27, 2009
12,968
221
106
Intel17 said:
The enthusiast space, much like the All-In-One PC space, is one of the few desktop spaces that's actually growing quite nicely.

Intel cares very much about the enthusiasts.

I wonder what the motherboard people have to say about the possibility of the mainstream enthusiast and SFF converging....even more so than it has with Mini-ITX.

Could these integrated VRMs allow true desktop TDPs from something like NUC? (assuming the appropriate blower fan and heatsink is installed)

See picture below of current NUC cooling system on the back of the mainboard:

nuc-exhaust.jpg


Picture of NUC with recess in the bottom of the enclosure for the above cooling system :

case-inside.jpg
 

cbn

Lifer
Mar 27, 2009
12,968
221
106
EDIT:

Some pics comparing NUC to a desktop cooler:

intel_nuc_mb_8.jpg


intel_nuc_mb_9.jpg


Based on that I would say it will be a challenge to get TDP up to desktop levels in such a small 4" x 4" package. However, I don't think it would be impossible if the height of NUC could be increased a little bit.
 
Last edited: