Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
Originally posted by: Uppsala9496
Originally posted by: Pacemaker
You guys are acting like if he had needed the insurance that they would have paid. In my experience they wouldn't have. They would have told him that he was not insuring the correct house and he would have been forced to fight them for months and they probably still wouldn't pay. For that reason I would say making him pay extra for that time period is out of line, but that being said legally you will probably have to pay.
It would have been a long dragged out court case, but in the end I am confident the insurance company would have paid if there was proof that he went in to make the address change.
Phone records, etc. And it isn't difficult to have the computer records of the person that was suppossed to have changed the information accessed.
I've been deposed at work before over a claim (I underwrote the account). All of my computer records along with all the notes I made about the file were accessed.
So, I have no doubt that he would have been covered even if it would have been a long drawn out case.
Exactly.
You would have gotten your money. Insurance companies have paper trails like no other for this reason. To be able to defend themself in court, they WANT records.
Sixone is a female btw.
And you want the coverage for that 10 months, but don't want to pay retroactively for it because nothing happened. Sixone is correct, BOTH you AND your agent are at fault.
For future reference, in the US (I don't know if you are in the states, but this is true in most places AFAIK) if there is a change to a policy we are legally required to send you an updated policy jacket reflecting the change. So if you make a change to the policy (like your address), you should be getting something in the mail stating that change was made.