• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Inspired from another thread....

Logically, yes, if you assume "more" is "not less (~less)" and useful is "not useless (~useless)".

Then "not less useless" = "not less" and "not useless" = more useful

But semantically, no, because less useless implies that the subject is still useless, just to a lesser degree. If a thing is useless to any degree, it can hardly be called useful.
 
Originally posted by: KEV1N
Logically, yes, if you assume "more" is "not less (~less)" and useful is "not useless (~useless)".

Then "not less useless" = "not less" and "not useless" = more useful

But semantically, no, because less useless implies that the subject is still useless, just to a lesser degree. If a thing is useless to any degree, it can hardly be called useful.

wow, that was a really thought out and informative answer to a kind of silly question. Are you an English teacher, or do you just have a lot of time on your hands?
 
Originally posted by: KEV1N
Logically, yes, if you assume "more" is "not less (~less)" and useful is "not useless (~useless)".

Then "not less useless" = "not less" and "not useless" = more useful

But semantically, no, because less useless implies that the subject is still useless, just to a lesser degree. If a thing is useless to any degree, it can hardly be called useful.

whoa

my head hurts
 
Originally posted by: KEV1N
Logically, yes, if you assume "more" is "not less (~less)" and useful is "not useless (~useless)".

Then "not less useless" = "not less" and "not useless" = more useful

But semantically, no, because less useless implies that the subject is still useless, just to a lesser degree. If a thing is useless to any degree, it can hardly be called useful.

i wish i could bottle you up.
 
less useless is relative. if you have two useless items A & B and B happens to be less useless than A, then B is just less useless. By saying B is more useful than A, you are implying that B isn't useless at all since if it's the only item left on the shelf, then you might use it. You'll just ignore A all together since it's useless.

 
Back
Top