Originally posted by: Moonbeam
I liked this part:
"Although they concluded that conservatives are less "integratively complex" than others are, Glaser said, "it doesn't mean that they're simple-minded."
Naturally it doesn't mean that they're not either.
---------------------
I have, of course been saying this same thing for years. You don't need research to see it. All you have to do is analyze your own more conservative motivations. Unfortunately though, I guess, the capacity to dispassionately dissect one?s self mercilessly and without compromise is not a universal instinct. Too bad too because it leads to the destruction of everything you ever thought was true.
That brings us to a deeper level, I think, than what our Berkeley friends know. The essence of liberal and conservative have to do with the tolerance level people have for feeling how bad they feel. The greater the level of denial the less intuitive feel, the greater the rigidity, the need for certainty, the fear of fear and on and on and on. A liberal is a person who has suffered emotionally so deeply he can feel what others feel. The ability to face and deal with pain makes for a sympathetic soul. A liberal is he who strives to lessen pain. The Cowboy, the emotionally cut of type, is an opposite syndrome and a typically conservative thing. He sees black and white and himself as white because he cannot feel pain. He is in a state of denial and rejection of his inner self. It's what makes conservatives less human and lame. They lack inner dimension.
I agree with you to an extent although I resent the fact that you label conservatives as less caring/feeling than liberals. There is a lack of resources that exists in the world. Given this, it is impossible to give sufficient resources to all who need. While I may not care about the HS dropout who failed take advantage of his free education, I would much rather give his welfare to someone who might need it more. What I am trying to say is that the United States is too big to effectively distribute resources to all who need. I feel that this should be done at the state and local level which I feel is much more efficient. Isn?t this conservative statement also a strong showing of feeling and emotion?
Another thing to think about:
I have been in support of the Iraq war, in addition to all other US efforts to spread democracy. I want everyone in the world to share in my opportunities in the US. So when liberals protest the Iraqi war...aren?t they forgetting all of the Iraqis who now have their freedom?!? Where is the emotion for the Iraqis when they argue the nonexistent WMD??
