- Oct 27, 2006
- 20,736
- 1,379
- 126
A certain forum member posted this in another thread :
"drawing a parallel between the G35 Sedan and the 350Z is ridiculous. If that's what they're doing, then yes, I disagree with them and I'm calling them ridiculous."
To avoid de-railing that entirely, and to focus on what I think is an interesting subject, I am posting this new thread.
My thoughts :
Edmunds (and many other sites) have noted the great performance of the G series Coupe and Sedan, noting the Z-car heritage and spec/performance overlap of the vehicles, even the price is in a reasonably close range. Considering that the motor, drivetrain, and track performance is so close, I have a hard time agreeing with someone who thinks that drawing a parallel between them is 'ridiculous'. In fact, I find the idea that someone could NOT find a parallel between these excellent cars ridiculous in itself.
Let me go back a couple of years to make a point. And I'll include 2008 specs as well.
2005 G35 Sedan (I'll compare auto to auto or manual to manual) For simplicity I'll start w/autos.
Weight : 3512lbs
Length : 186.5"
Height : 57.7"
Width : 69"
HP : 298HP
TQ : 260FP
DT : RWD
0-60 : 6.1 Seconds
1/4 : 14.3 @ 101MPH
2005 350Z Coupe
Weight : 3217lbs
Length : 169.6"
Height : 51.9"
Width : 71.5"
HP : 287HP
TQ : 274FP
DT : RWD
0-60 : 6.0 Seconds
1/4 : 14.59 @ 99.3MPH (odd, I think the car can do better)
Comparing the 6MT to the Manual-transmission 350Z is more difficult, as different sites have vastly different performance numbers for both vehicles. Safe to say, though, that 5.4-5.9 is the normal range for both vehicles.
To be fair, I'm focusing on the G35 Sedan vs. the 350Z here, as the G coupe is definitely more than an equal to the 350Z in any meaningful way. I can see the viewpoint that the 350Z is more of a 'sports car', and the G35 sedan is a 'luxury sport sedan'. What I have to insist, though, is that there are so many similarities and shared parts that it's impossible to deny them outright.
And finally : The 350Z faring only mediocre in the sports-car world (5+ second 0-60, started @ 260Hp, etc) put it in firing range of the better luxury sports sedans and coupes. The fact is that 0-60 of 5.5-6.0 is very nice for a $30-35k luxury sedan, but at the same time, disappointing for a $30k sports car. Look at the GTO demolish the Z in almost everything for a good example of that. Also wait until Ford starts getting more serious with the Mustang (to coincide with the renewed Camaro), as you'll probably see mid/high 4-second 0-60 runs from the better Mustang/Camaro models.
Thoughts/Observations/Etc? I love AT Garage, Btw
Where's Zemnervolt when you need him 
EDIT : Added 1/4 times.
"drawing a parallel between the G35 Sedan and the 350Z is ridiculous. If that's what they're doing, then yes, I disagree with them and I'm calling them ridiculous."
To avoid de-railing that entirely, and to focus on what I think is an interesting subject, I am posting this new thread.
My thoughts :
Edmunds (and many other sites) have noted the great performance of the G series Coupe and Sedan, noting the Z-car heritage and spec/performance overlap of the vehicles, even the price is in a reasonably close range. Considering that the motor, drivetrain, and track performance is so close, I have a hard time agreeing with someone who thinks that drawing a parallel between them is 'ridiculous'. In fact, I find the idea that someone could NOT find a parallel between these excellent cars ridiculous in itself.
Let me go back a couple of years to make a point. And I'll include 2008 specs as well.
2005 G35 Sedan (I'll compare auto to auto or manual to manual) For simplicity I'll start w/autos.
Weight : 3512lbs
Length : 186.5"
Height : 57.7"
Width : 69"
HP : 298HP
TQ : 260FP
DT : RWD
0-60 : 6.1 Seconds
1/4 : 14.3 @ 101MPH
2005 350Z Coupe
Weight : 3217lbs
Length : 169.6"
Height : 51.9"
Width : 71.5"
HP : 287HP
TQ : 274FP
DT : RWD
0-60 : 6.0 Seconds
1/4 : 14.59 @ 99.3MPH (odd, I think the car can do better)
Comparing the 6MT to the Manual-transmission 350Z is more difficult, as different sites have vastly different performance numbers for both vehicles. Safe to say, though, that 5.4-5.9 is the normal range for both vehicles.
To be fair, I'm focusing on the G35 Sedan vs. the 350Z here, as the G coupe is definitely more than an equal to the 350Z in any meaningful way. I can see the viewpoint that the 350Z is more of a 'sports car', and the G35 sedan is a 'luxury sport sedan'. What I have to insist, though, is that there are so many similarities and shared parts that it's impossible to deny them outright.
And finally : The 350Z faring only mediocre in the sports-car world (5+ second 0-60, started @ 260Hp, etc) put it in firing range of the better luxury sports sedans and coupes. The fact is that 0-60 of 5.5-6.0 is very nice for a $30-35k luxury sedan, but at the same time, disappointing for a $30k sports car. Look at the GTO demolish the Z in almost everything for a good example of that. Also wait until Ford starts getting more serious with the Mustang (to coincide with the renewed Camaro), as you'll probably see mid/high 4-second 0-60 runs from the better Mustang/Camaro models.
Thoughts/Observations/Etc? I love AT Garage, Btw
EDIT : Added 1/4 times.