Indictments coming...

[ivwshane]

Nuh huh, you made me!!!

Apparently the only people responsible for their votes are Clinton supporters. Everyone else has been absolved from the consequences of their vote. Its truly a bizarro world we live in.

 

[fskimospy]

So Trump forced this FBI agent to text his mistress? Clinton waterboys just can't seem to keep their mouths shut.

Now it’s ‘Clinton waterboys’? Again, you guys have lost your minds. There is no evidence that any investigation has been biased by this guy. Conservatives tend to view ‘bias’ as based on whether or not they got the outcome they wanted.

 

[Starbuck1975]

Wow! So removing people who don't appear to be impartial is now a sign of the overall investigation being impartial?

Good god! Do you even hear yourself at this point?

Do you hear yourself? If the partisan waterboy already exerted influence at critical milestones on the proceedings or outcome, does that not undermine the entire investigation?

Do we really want to give Trump an excuse to fire Mueller or undermine the credibility of the investigation.

 

[Starbuck1975]

Apparently the only people responsible for their votes are Clinton supporters. Everyone else has been absolved from the consequences of their vote. Its truly a bizarro world we live in.

I was denied the opportunity to vote for the candidate of my choice because it wasn't his turn, the candidate capable of beating Trump. So yes, Clinton waterboys are responsible.

 

[fskimospy]

Do you hear yourself? If the partisan waterboy already exerted influence at critical milestones on the proceedings or outcome, does that not undermine the entire investigation?

Do we really want to give Trump an excuse to fire Mueller or undermine the credibility of the investigation.

Do you hear yourself? If you think there is evidence he undermined the Trump investigation then please provide literally a single shred of evidence that’s the case. Otherwise concern trolling, this is ridiculous.

 

[Starbuck1975]

Now it’s ‘Clinton waterboys’? Again, you guys have lost your minds. There is no evidence that any investigation has been biased by this guy. Conservatives tend to view ‘bias’ as based on whether or not they got the outcome they wanted.

Please, if someone found a social media post of an FBI agent central to these investigations wearing a MAGA hat or even in attendance at a Trump rally, you would be losing your sh!t.

 

[ivwshane]

Do you hear yourself? If the partisan waterboy already exerted influence at critical milestones on the proceedings or outcome, does that not undermine the entire investigation?

Do we really want to give Trump an excuse to fire Mueller or undermine the credibility of the investigation.

And do you not understand your circular reasoning? Having a partisan apart of the investigation means the investigation is compromised but removing the partisan means the investigation is compromised.

Its ridiculous.

 

[fskimospy]

I was denied the opportunity to vote for the candidate of my choice because it wasn't his turn, the candidate capable of beating Trump. So yes, Clinton waterboys are responsible.

You were denied the opportunity to vote for him because he lost the primary by millions of votes.

I always find it funny that Sanders supporters are so sure he could have beaten Trump and that Clinton was the ‘worst candidate in history’. Guess what? Sanders got crushed by that ‘worst candidate’.

 

[Paratus]

Not unsurprising that people around here aren't talking about that. If on the other foot, they would be all about it. How it is not a big deal to them in incredible. Just more hypocrisy from the lefties here. Clear bias in a pretty big way, in several big "cases". He obviously had a bias agenda and ranked very highly. Passed judgement while having a conflict of interest to say the least. Hmmm, now where have I see this before.

Rational people also look at bias as undermining impartiality.

Rational people also recognize "one of many" as a leading indicator of a potential broader and more systemic problem.

Maybe there were many Clinton waterboys at the FBI which could explain why Comey in the end fired a torpedo at her relative to the Weiner emails.

The text messages may or may not be proof. The content or context certainly will, assuming they are released.

Before jumping on the “biased FBI band wagon” consider this. The agent in question:

• He investigated Hillary
• Investigated Trump

Is it possible he found jack shit while investigating Hillary and quite a lot of dirt on Trump?

If his texts ended up being she’s clean and he’s dirty AF then he only has the appearance of bias.

 

[Starbuck1975]

Do you hear yourself? If you think there is evidence he undermined the Trump investigation then please provide literally a single shred of evidence that’s the case. Otherwise concern trolling, this is ridiculous.

I already stated I am waiting to see the context of the text messages and the results of the review by the Office of the Inspector General.

 

[ivwshane]

Please, if someone found a social media post of an FBI agent central to these investigations wearing a MAGA hat or even in attendance at a Trump rally, you would be losing your sh!t.

We'd want the person removed from the investigation. In fact, if they were removed prior to any outcry I would think that that would actually lend credibility to the investigation.

Not you though, you've got a whataboutism ready to go to counter anything that comes up.

 

[fskimospy]

Please, if someone found a social media post of an FBI agent central to these investigations wearing a MAGA hat or even in attendance at a Trump rally, you would be losing your sh!t.

Please. The idea that this investigation or any other is comprised entirely of people with no political opinions is a ridiculous fantasy and it’s transparent concern trolling on your part.

If you have literally a single shred of evidence that the investigation is biased let’s hear it. One. Single. Shred.

 

[fskimospy]

I already stated I am waiting to see the context of the text messages and the results of the review by the Office of the Inspector General.

I don’t see why the context of the text messages would matter in the slightest. Show me biased professional conduct.

One. Single. Shred.

 

[ivwshane]

I was denied the opportunity to vote for the candidate of my choice because it wasn't his turn, the candidate capable of beating Trump. So yes, Clinton waterboys are responsible.

Lol. So because your guy couldn't win a primary your vote for someone other than the only other viable alternative to trump means you bear no responsibility for your vote? Amazing!

 

[Fanatical Meat]

I think someone has been reading RT tweets again

 

[Starbuck1975]

I don’t see why the context of the text messages would matter in the slightest. Show me biased professional conduct.

One. Single. Shred.

Ask Mueller. He clearly saw enough evidence of bias. Now it is up to independent review to determine if that bias influenced outcomes.

 

[ivwshane]

I don’t see why the context of the text messages would matter in the slightest. Show me biased professional conduct.

One. Single. Shred.

The proof of a biased investigation is that a biased actor that was part of the investigation was removed from the investigation, duh!


/facepalm

 

[Starbuck1975]

Lol. So because your guy couldn't win a primary your vote for someone other than the only other viable alternative to trump means you bear no responsibility for your vote? Amazing!

I voted for the candidate that didn't need waterboys to tip the scale in her favor, a candidate who managed to lose to the worst candidate in American political history due to her tone deafness and arrogant reliance on the momentum of inevitability.

My conscience is clear.

 

[Starbuck1975]

The proof of a biased investigation is that a biased actor that was part of the investigation was removed from the investigation, duh!


/facepalm

Potential indicator, not proof, worth further examination

 

[zinfamous]

Not unsurprising that people around here aren't talking about that. If on the other foot, they would be all about it. How it is not a big deal to them in incredible. Just more hypocrisy from the lefties here. Clear bias in a pretty big way, in several big "cases". He obviously had a bias agenda and ranked very highly. Passed judgement while having a conflict of interest to say the least. Hmmm, now where have I see this before.

grab it, Ackmed! Grab that little semi-interesting fart of an agent like a pitbull grabs a postman's leg. Never let go! I am sure you will find the real truth behind all of this if you just keep grabbing and shaking that one thing!

 

[zinfamous]

Plenty of medicine for all. Trump is undoubtedly worst, but Clinton waterboys are largely responsible for his becoming President.

I'm pretty sure that "Clinton Waterboys" wouldn't be the ones that voted for Trump.

We all have our own choices, to make, yes? Would you not agree that the ultimate responsibility of the individual casting their vote, lies on that that individual? But please, let's keep hearing how people that cast votes for Trump's opponent are the ones responsible for Trump's win. Quite sad that this failure of logic keeps clawing its way back from the grave.

 

[fskimospy]

I voted for the candidate that didn't need waterboys to tip the scale in her favor, a candidate who managed to lose to the worst candidate in American political history due to her tone deafness and arrogant reliance on the momentum of inevitability.

My conscience is clear.

You realize your candidate lost to the person who lost to the worst candidate in history, right? Have you considered that Sanders lost because he was a bad candidate and people liked Clinton better?

 

[zinfamous]

I voted for the candidate that didn't need waterboys to tip the scale in her favor, a candidate who managed to lose to the worst candidate in American political history due to her tone deafness and arrogant reliance on the momentum of inevitability.

My conscience is clear.

Ah, so it's the other people that voted for the same person that you voted for, but because of their reasons for voting for that candidate that of course you prescribe for them. I am still at a loss as to how this makes any kind of sense. But it seems to make you feel better, so there is something in that.
...just, don't think you are going to be making this as a rational appeal to anyone, lol.

 

[dank69]

Ask Mueller. He clearly saw enough evidence of bias. Now it is up to independent review to determine if that bias influenced outcomes.

The other possibility is that he wanted to remove any appearance of bias, but don't let that stop you from jumping to your preferred conclusion.

 

[MomentsofSanity]

Ask Mueller. He clearly saw enough evidence of bias. Now it is up to independent review to determine if that bias influenced outcomes.

No what he saw was the potential appearance of bias. Not evidence. That is a huge difference from a legal stand point.

Evidence would mean this guy took actual action based on his views towards Trump. There is NO evidence of this that you can cite.