Incorrect phrases you often hear

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: sirjonk
So my bud was like "for all intensive purposes..." I'm like, what? You mean "intents and purposes"? He's like, yeah. He then reprimanded me for "towing the line" and I could hear the "tow" instead of "toe" in his voice. He was getting annoyed at me now and threatened to "duck tape" my mouth shut. I told him that wouldn't make him correct but he said he'd do it "irregardless". I was only trying to help but he said he "could care less". So I took a queue from him and segwayed to another topic.

You forgot to put "queue" & "segwayed" in quotes.

No, that was me attempting to be ironic after criticizing someone for messing up a phrase and then doing it myself, but perhaps I was too suttle.
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: Kadarin
peaks my interest
loosing vs losing
take it for granite
should of

The problem, I believe, is that people don't read anymore, so they've never actually seen the proper way to use these expressions. When they type out an expression they've heard, they then do so as it sounds, rather than how it's correctly used.

even with knowing the proper way to use them the human brain interperates them fine when used incorrectly ;)
 

SirStev0

Lifer
Nov 13, 2003
10,449
6
81
I was guilty for pronouncing "faux" as "fox"... but in my defense... French is a stupid language.
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: Kadarin
peaks my interest
loosing vs losing
take it for granite
should of

The problem, I believe, is that people don't read anymore, so they've never actually seen the proper way to use these expressions. When they type out an expression they've heard, they then do so as it sounds, rather than how it's correctly used.

As someone who reads nonstop, I have the reverse problem where I read words I'd never heard and when I try to use them in a sentence out loud for the first time get them completely wrong :) Teetotaler != TEE-to-TAHL-er hehe
 

imported_Jdo

Member
Mar 31, 2008
169
0
0
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: sirjonk
So my bud was like "for all intensive purposes..." I'm like, what? You mean "intents and purposes"? He's like, yeah. He then reprimanded me for "towing the line" and I could hear the "tow" instead of "toe" in his voice. He was getting annoyed at me now and threatened to "duck tape" my mouth shut. I told him that wouldn't make him correct but he said he'd do it "irregardless". I was only trying to help but he said he "could care less". So I took a queue from him and segwayed to another topic.

You forgot to put "queue" & "segwayed" in quotes.

No, that was me attempting to be ironic after criticizing someone for messing up a phrase and then doing it myself, but perhaps I was too suttle.

"Suttle"? hahahhaha. This thread delivers!
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: Jdo
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: sirjonk
So my bud was like "for all intensive purposes..." I'm like, what? You mean "intents and purposes"? He's like, yeah. He then reprimanded me for "towing the line" and I could hear the "tow" instead of "toe" in his voice. He was getting annoyed at me now and threatened to "duck tape" my mouth shut. I told him that wouldn't make him correct but he said he'd do it "irregardless". I was only trying to help but he said he "could care less". So I took a queue from him and segwayed to another topic.

You forgot to put "queue" & "segwayed" in quotes.

No, that was me attempting to be ironic after criticizing someone for messing up a phrase and then doing it myself, but perhaps I was too suttle.

"Suttle"? hahahhaha. This thread delivers!

I refuse to explain more than one joke/use of sarcasm per thread. Misunderestimate me at your own risk.
 

imported_Jdo

Member
Mar 31, 2008
169
0
0
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: Jdo
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: sirjonk
So my bud was like "for all intensive purposes..." I'm like, what? You mean "intents and purposes"? He's like, yeah. He then reprimanded me for "towing the line" and I could hear the "tow" instead of "toe" in his voice. He was getting annoyed at me now and threatened to "duck tape" my mouth shut. I told him that wouldn't make him correct but he said he'd do it "irregardless". I was only trying to help but he said he "could care less". So I took a queue from him and segwayed to another topic.

You forgot to put "queue" & "segwayed" in quotes.

No, that was me attempting to be ironic after criticizing someone for messing up a phrase and then doing it myself, but perhaps I was too suttle.

"Suttle"? hahahhaha. This thread delivers!

I refuse to explain more than one joke/use of sarcasm per thread. Misunderestimate me at your own risk.

:eek:

sorry, i'm not very good at carrying an act so far. some of you guys would make good comics!
 

middlehead

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2004
4,573
2
81
Originally posted by: Gooberlx2
"I could care less"
That's the main one I hear, people getting "could care less" and "couldn't care less" backwards.

Also people saying "not really" when they actually mean "no."
 

Stifko

Diamond Member
Dec 8, 1999
4,799
2
81
I hear a lot of ppl say "irregardless" lately even though that is not a word.
 

BigToque

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
11,700
0
76
Originally posted by: ColdFusion718
Originally posted by: JS80
Worst is when people try to sound smart and use "I" incorrectly (instead of "me").

Do you mean all of the "<person's name> and I" captions for 99% of pictures found on facebook, myspace, etc.? :D

I'm sure I've spoken/written like this before. Do you have any links describing why it's incorrect? What would be correct? Me and <name>?
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
"next weekend" to describe the weekend after next.

There's a thread on here like 6 pages long about that.


Also, strangely, inflammable = flammable, not non-flammable. This one is actually understandable due to the prefix throwing everyone off.
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
"for free" or "next weekend" to describe the weekend after next.

next weekend is being used correctly when talking about the weekend after the one comming up

this weekend = the 12th-13th
next weekend = the 19th and 20th
 

daveymark

Lifer
Sep 15, 2003
10,573
1
0
it's a doggy dog world out there

Can I axe you a question

Lactose And Tolerant

and of course....

super nintendo chalmers
 

daveymark

Lifer
Sep 15, 2003
10,573
1
0
Originally posted by: daveshel
This thread is better then the last one.

better than the last few, actually. have to go back to the infamous thread in 05 to get better than this one.
 

DukeN

Golden Member
Dec 12, 1999
1,422
0
76
Originally posted by: JS80
Worst is when people try to sound smart and use "I" incorrectly (instead of "me").

I know, that is the worse thing I ever herd.
 

MiniDoom

Diamond Member
Jan 5, 2004
5,305
0
76
Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
"for free" or "next weekend" to describe the weekend after next.

next weekend is being used correctly when talking about the weekend after the one comming up

this weekend = the 12th-13th
next weekend = the 19th and 20th

This weekend is the next weekend.:|
And another is "Native Americans". isn't this anyone born in America?:confused:
 

RightIsWrong

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2005
5,649
0
0
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
To add insult to injury...


isn't it "to add SALT TO INJURY"?

Adding insult to injury is correct.

You might be mixing up that phrase with "adding/throwing/pouring salt to an open wound"?