Saint Nick
Lifer
- Jan 21, 2005
- 17,722
- 6
- 81
Originally posted by: RKS
Originally posted by: JS80
Worst is when people try to sound smart and use "I" incorrectly (instead of "me").
Me never make mistakes like that. Me always sound smart.
Originally posted by: Atheus
someone told me they used to think 'scapegoat' was 'escape goat'... like an escape car but a goat...
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
DOH!
The phrase "Incorrect phrases you often hear." is grammatically correct.
Originally posted by: E equals MC2
irregardless
nucular (our dumbass president)
Originally posted by: hanoverphist
Originally posted by: Anubis
statue of limitations
also
moo point
i hate it when people tell me its a mute point. and irregardless was added to the dictionary, but it is still incorrect. the incorrect use of I bugs me as well, and i know my kids are getting sick of me correcting them.
Yeah, the main thing. Since we are typing about this stuff, spelling is taking a front seat whereas in conversation, of course, spelling isn't particularly involved (although it isn't uninvolved!). I came across a quote of Mark Twain recently, that got my attention concerning spelling: "I have no use for a man who can only spell a word one way."Originally posted by: Anubis
Originally posted by: Kadarin
peaks my interest
loosing vs losing
take it for granite
should of
The problem, I believe, is that people don't read anymore, so they've never actually seen the proper way to use these expressions. When they type out an expression they've heard, they then do so as it sounds, rather than how it's correctly used.
even with knowing the proper way to use them the human brain interperates them fine when used incorrectly![]()
OK, I must know, are you being flippant here or are you being serious?Originally posted by: SirStev0
I was guilty for pronouncing "faux" as "fox"... but in my defense... French is a stupid language.
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
"for free" or "next weekend" to describe the weekend after next.
Look, people, admit it... in a lot of circles it's trendy to be incorrect in your speech mannerisms!Originally posted by: daveymark
it's a doggy dog world out there
Can I axe you a question
Lactose And Tolerant
and of course....
super nintendo chalmers
I think it's because certain folks don't want to deny you the right to remain hopelessly compartmentalized. If you did not remain so, you might make trouble. You might actually throw off the yoke of tyranny and demand your freedom, your sanity, your birthright.Originally posted by: Atomic Playboy
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: rdubbz420
"next weekend" to describe the weekend after next.
There's a thread on here like 6 pages long about that.
Also, strangely, inflammable = flammable, not non-flammable. This one is actually understandable due to the prefix throwing everyone off.
The inflammable = flammable thing pisses me off. Not because the two words mean the same thing, just because we don't need both words. Plus, what the hell is "flammable." Able to be flammed? I've never flammed anything in my life. I've blown shit up. Maybe they should just put "This shit blows up" on flammable stuff. Or better yet "explosive." There is absolutely no doubt in anyone's mind what "explosive" means. It means that it explodes. Better not light it on fire!
One that was pissing me off as I drove down the highway yesterday was illegal vs. unlawful. Is there any difference in these two words at all? "Drinking and driving is illegal," "driving without a seatbelt is unlawful." Well what the hell? Is illegal worse? Would I rather do something that is full of unlaw? And then, just to fuck with you, they'll throw out "Unmuffled engine braking prohibited." Now we have three words, and they all mean the exact same thing: No. "No drinking and driving," "no driving without a seatbelt," "no unmuffled engine braking." Pretty damn self-explanatory to me. Try getting pulled over and telling the cop you didn't understand what "no" meant. Why must we attempt to obfuscate our meaning with superlative, brobdingnagian vocabulary?
Congrats. That must have been a good day for you!Originally posted by: JS80
My chemistry teacher in elementary school thought inflammable was not flammable. I pwned her by pulling my pocket dictionary i had just got for my birthday that I had in my backpack and showing her. Not too bright that one.
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: Jdo
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: rh71
Originally posted by: sirjonk
So my bud was like "for all intensive purposes..." I'm like, what? You mean "intents and purposes"? He's like, yeah. He then reprimanded me for "towing the line" and I could hear the "tow" instead of "toe" in his voice. He was getting annoyed at me now and threatened to "duck tape" my mouth shut. I told him that wouldn't make him correct but he said he'd do it "irregardless". I was only trying to help but he said he "could care less". So I took a queue from him and segwayed to another topic.
You forgot to put "queue" & "segwayed" in quotes.
No, that was me attempting to be ironic after criticizing someone for messing up a phrase and then doing it myself, but perhaps I was too suttle.
"Suttle"? hahahhaha. This thread delivers!
I refuse to explain more than one joke/use of sarcasm per thread. Misunderestimate me at your own risk.
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Originally posted by: ConstipatedVigilante
The thing that annoys the fuck out of me - and it appears everywhere - is when people use "all but." For example (and this is used often in newscasts and stuff):
"New Orleans was all but destroyed by Katrina."
IT WAS DESTROYED! WTF??!?!?!
It annoys me when people say "could care less" too.
Eh, it wasn't totally destroyed. All but destroyed implies that there is a little left. Partially destroyed would be a better term for New Orleans. Waveland, Mississippi were all but destroyed.
<---Katrina "Ground Zero" resident
Originally posted by: daveshel
Someone got off 'Scotch free.'
