preslove
Lifer
- Sep 10, 2003
- 16,754
- 64
- 91
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: vi edit
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: allisolm
Interesting to note the beers that Anheuser-Busch ALREADY imports and distributes:
Bass, Becks, Hoegaarden,Stella Artois, Kirin, Tiger, Grolsch, Lowenbrau, and others.
That's fine. The question is where to keep the profit.
We need to keep the profits IN AMERICA. Even with those being imported the profit stayed with an American company.
So I'm never going to buy bud again and unfortunately will have to strike all those beers (they look like a lot of inbev brands anyway) off the list as well. Sam Adams it is.
This thinking always kind of annoyed me. There's still thousands of US employees getting paid to make it and deliver it. There's still tens of thousands of bars, restaurants, and grocery stores, ect that make money off of selling it. And people in the US can still enjoy it. I guess I'd rather see it that way than say...having Ford still be "based" in America but have all manufacturing done in Mexico or elsewhere. I don't really care about the profits so much as the jobs that it produces. I couldn't give two shits about some middle management sitting in an office collecting $250,00k + stock options and a CEO making 10+ million and a golden parachute to jump with.
Jobs will be lost and money will flow out of America. That is NOT a good thing, it is a bad thing.
1). Not a lot of jobs are going to be lost, because inbev is more than likely going to start brewing Stella and it's other European brands here, in old AB breweries.
2). AB was a publicly traded company that could be owned by anyone, including furerners. The profit flowed outside of US before.