Originally posted by: mithrandir2001
I hate to say it but you can't afford kids anymore.Originally posted by: Shockwave
Ameesh, you dont strike me as someone who's in the real world yet. How old are you??
Viper. Man, I hope it works for you. Hell, I couldnt HOPE to save 750 a month. My rent alone is more then that. Plus, what really kills me is the fact my 1 income has to support 5 people (Me, the wife, 3 kids) I probably wont hit the dual income stage until 30ish, when the kids are really old enough to handle themselves so the wife can seriously pursue a career.
It adds up fast, the bills. I'd say an average for most people would be...
600 rent
400 car + insurance (Thats a 4 wheel car, not some fancy crap)
200 utilities (Assuming basic cable, regualr phone, etc etc)
Thats 1200 a month, just in stuff you HAVE TO HAVE to survive (except a car, but lets be realistic) That doesnt include food, upkeep for said car (gas, oil, tires) doesnt include an occasional movie or going out (Unless you have NO social life), doesnt include ANY other payments (CC, student loan)
So, my question is, how much do you think someone in the real world livin on their own can really save?? I know few people who's bi weekly paycheck totals 1200 after taxes. Well, among my friends, among my co-workers, thats actually probably the smallest of the paychecks handed out. Too bad its mine
Either way, people who DONT fully support themselves really have no room to tell us who DO support ourselves, and others, just how easy it is to save or any other crap like that. Now, if you ARE supporting yourself and can save like that, hell, I applaud you!! But, alot of people just dont realize how hard it is, especially if you have any obligations other then yourself (kids, a fish etc etc)
Fine, that is a stupid statement but there is some validity to it. The people who are most financially stretched where I work are the ones with kids. Singles and childless couples typically aren't always crying the blues like the working parents are. Child care is a big problem. It's very expensive. We have an on-site child care center at work and it costs around $500 per child per month (varies based on age, of course). That's not chump change. My mortgage's P&I is $656 so in that light the costs seem ridiculous.
On the other side of the coin, my sister works in a day care center and she gets paid crap. I think she makes around $8 an hour with medical benefits. This is simply unacceptable compensation, I think, for somebody with a 4 year degree and a state certification. She can't live on her own, not in the suburbs and not without looking and living like a rat. She lives at home, like I did.
So day care costs are too high, but day care workers are underpaid.
The Moonbeams of this world will argue that we manufacture our own problems, that our materialism breeds a lifetime of debt and financial struggle. Perhaps, but I think the real problem is our burdening government, who taxes too much and spends too much and has almost single-handedly destroyed the middle class in this country. About half of my income goes to taxes: Federal, state, county, local, sales, gasoline, alcohol taxes, telecomm surcharges, regulatory fees. We don't work for ourselves, we work for others, the government. If we don't have enough money to save for our future, it's because too many arms of government have laid claim on our earnings.
And of course, the new "epidemic" is that women are having children too late. Unlike men, women must fight a biological clock when wanting to bear children. Some are waiting until they are 35, 40 or even older before they have their first child. I can't blame them. If I had to support a child, that would cause havoc on my financial plan. Children are expenses, they do not provide any income, not for a long, long time, if ever. Of course I am being very clinical and cold about this, but when you look at how financially troubled many people are, you have to wonder if kids should be in the picture. Yes, pro-creation is a necessary function for the species to survive but modern realities seem to suggest otherwise.
Yea, daycare is outrageously expensive, yet still pays barely better then minimum wage.
Whaere is all that money goig?
My guess is insurance. Liability insurance for daycare has got to be outrageous.
Yet again, the lawers rape us.
Of course, it's not just the lawyers, they're just the opportunistic parasites that lubricate the system & reap most of the benefits.
Alot of it is idiot juries, and insurance companies that cave in & settle instead of fighting.
In any case ... daycare is our second highest single expense after the mortgage. Can't wait to get out from under it.