Originally posted by: Skoorb
yes, same reason everybody else here will give and has given in the past in a million messages on the same topic on a million message boards
Originally posted by: Skoorb
yes, same reason everybody else here will give and has given in the past in a million messages on the same topic on a million message boards
Originally posted by: Skoorb
yes, same reason everybody else here will give and has given in the past in a million messages on the same topic on a million message boards
Originally posted by: judasmachine
Why didn't we nuke their massed army on the southern islands? We were about to fight the bloodiest battle ever, we had to do something or risk 10s or 100s of thousands of casualities on both sides. I repeat my question though, why did we NOT nuke the massed japanese army on the southern islands?
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: judasmachine
Why didn't we nuke their massed army on the southern islands? We were about to fight the bloodiest battle ever, we had to do something or risk 10s or 100s of thousands of casualities on both sides. I repeat my question though, why did we NOT nuke the massed japanese army on the southern islands?
[tinfoilhot]because hiroshima and nagasaki were mostly untouched by bombing campaigns and made good test sites so the real effects could be seen and analyzed[/tinfoilhat]
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: judasmachine
Why didn't we nuke their massed army on the southern islands? We were about to fight the bloodiest battle ever, we had to do something or risk 10s or 100s of thousands of casualities on both sides. I repeat my question though, why did we NOT nuke the massed japanese army on the southern islands?
[tinfoilhot]because hiroshima and nagasaki were mostly untouched by bombing campaigns and made good test sites so the real effects could be seen and analyzed[/tinfoilhat]
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: judasmachine
Why didn't we nuke their massed army on the southern islands? We were about to fight the bloodiest battle ever, we had to do something or risk 10s or 100s of thousands of casualities on both sides. I repeat my question though, why did we NOT nuke the massed japanese army on the southern islands?
[tinfoilhot]because hiroshima and nagasaki were mostly untouched by bombing campaigns and made good test sites so the real effects could be seen and analyzed[/tinfoilhat]
HUH????
That is your answer to the mans simple and honest question?
Originally posted by: judasmachine
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: judasmachine
Why didn't we nuke their massed army on the southern islands? We were about to fight the bloodiest battle ever, we had to do something or risk 10s or 100s of thousands of casualities on both sides. I repeat my question though, why did we NOT nuke the massed japanese army on the southern islands?
[tinfoilhot]because hiroshima and nagasaki were mostly untouched by bombing campaigns and made good test sites so the real effects could be seen and analyzed[/tinfoilhat]
HUH????
That is your answer to the mans simple and honest question?
Thank you dahunan. And mike it was a simple question. The Japanese army was massed on their southern islands, awaiting what they thought was imminent invasion by US Marines. There were 100s of thousands of troops, and it would have been the bloodiest battle we've ever fought, not to mention anyone else for that matter. It is my belief that we used the nuke to prevent this battle which I think is fair enough given the circumstances. I wasn't asking out of some conspiracy nut theory, this question just popped in my head when I was watching a film in my history class some years back and has kind of haunted me when I think of this subject. Your explaination may or may not be accurate, I just wish to go on record that I meant this as a simple honest question.
Originally posted by: UglyCasanova
Originally posted by: judasmachine
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: judasmachine
Why didn't we nuke their massed army on the southern islands? We were about to fight the bloodiest battle ever, we had to do something or risk 10s or 100s of thousands of casualities on both sides. I repeat my question though, why did we NOT nuke the massed japanese army on the southern islands?
[tinfoilhot]because hiroshima and nagasaki were mostly untouched by bombing campaigns and made good test sites so the real effects could be seen and analyzed[/tinfoilhat]
HUH????
That is your answer to the mans simple and honest question?
Thank you dahunan. And mike it was a simple question. The Japanese army was massed on their southern islands, awaiting what they thought was imminent invasion by US Marines. There were 100s of thousands of troops, and it would have been the bloodiest battle we've ever fought, not to mention anyone else for that matter. It is my belief that we used the nuke to prevent this battle which I think is fair enough given the circumstances. I wasn't asking out of some conspiracy nut theory, this question just popped in my head when I was watching a film in my history class some years back and has kind of haunted me when I think of this subject. Your explaination may or may not be accurate, I just wish to go on record that I meant this as a simple honest question.
No clue if this is why or not, just a thought. If there were that large of a concentration of Japanese forces there how feasible would a bombing mission have been?
Originally posted by: HalosPuma
Most definately YES. In fact, the more important question to ask is why are we not nuking Fallujah, Tehran, and Pyongang right now?
Back in the 1940's America had brass balls. I feared that the pussification of America by the liberals had destroyed our will to defend ourselves, but Nov 2nd re-affirmed our resolve and in short time we will be nuking the other Axis of Evil countries and win the War on Terror.
Originally posted by: dahunan
Fallujah, Tehran, and Pyongyang.. Aren't there anymore place we can nuke..
Originally posted by: HalosPuma
Deadly serious. Here is last week's article regarding Iran's nuclear developments
Only two days before the election, the Iranian parliament voted to resume nuclear-enrichment activities, with some members chanting, "Death to America."
When will all of America realize that you cannot negotiate with these people. They are not like the Soviets - they want all of the Western Civilization destroyed. We must destroy them like we did the Japs in WWII. If not, the War on Terror will go on for many years, possibly decades.
Originally posted by: Astaroth33
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: judasmachine
Why didn't we nuke their massed army on the southern islands? We were about to fight the bloodiest battle ever, we had to do something or risk 10s or 100s of thousands of casualities on both sides. I repeat my question though, why did we NOT nuke the massed japanese army on the southern islands?
[tinfoilhot]because hiroshima and nagasaki were mostly untouched by bombing campaigns and made good test sites so the real effects could be seen and analyzed[/tinfoilhat]
More like because both cities were industrial centers, and their destruction would impact the japanese war effort far more than using against the japanese troops?