In Eyes Wide Shut...

[olds]

"It puts the lotion on it's skin"

 

[DainBramaged]

Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
"It puts the lotion on it's skin"

Or else it gets the hose again...

:laugh:

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: DainBramaged

Originally posted by: oldsmoboat
"It puts the lotion on it's skin"

Or else it gets the hose again...

:laugh:

Ah that character was so awesome :laugh:

 

[Orsorum]

Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
...Annnnyway...

There was a discussion on iMDb about this and I think the consensus was she said something like "I'll see you at the party" or something pertaining to the orgy party he goes too. Doesn't make much sense since she was "entertaining" the 2 Asian guys before being caught, and it would be kind of late for her to get there on time for the ceremony Cruise walked in on, but that's Kubrick for ya.

That's something, at least. Thank you!!!

 

[shortylickens]

BUMP! Please check dates before posting.

I wanted to discuss this without making a new thread. Couldnt find a recent one and since we apparently have the ability to bump really old threads, I went ahead and did it.

For the first time I finally watched the edited and unedited versions side by side, using Netflix for the R-rated, and Media Player for the original. (The orgy scene is obviously what I'm talking about.)
Have to say I am amazed at the digital film editing they had back in 1999. They must have used the same team that did The Matrix. The inserted people look totally natural and you have to watch the two versions together to know who's who.

Of course, when you consider that someone used digital ink and paint to remove wires in Howard the Duck (1986) I guess its not that impressive.
http://www.filmsite.org/visualeffects1.html
Eyes Wide Shut doesnt even get a mention, indicating digital correction of many items was already a common thing.
I also heard the reason Hudson Hawk was so ridiculously expensive was Bruce Willis didnt like his hairline in the movie and every single frame of him had to have hair digitally added. That came out years earlier.

That is all. Enjoy.

 

[Turin39789]

Originally posted by: shortylickens
BUMP! Please check dates before posting.

I wanted to discuss this without making a new thread. Couldnt find a recent one and since we apparently have the ability to bump really old threads, I went ahead and did it.

For the first time I finally watched the edited and unedited versions side by side, using Netflix for the R-rated, and Media Player for the original. (The orgy scene is obviously what I'm talking about.)
Have to say I am amazed at the digital film editing they had back in 1999. They must have used the same team that did The Matrix. The inserted people look totally natural and you have to watch the two versions together to know who's who.

Of course, when you consider that someone used digital ink and paint to remove wires in Howard the Duck (1986) I guess its not that impressive.
http://www.filmsite.org/visualeffects1.html
Eyes Wide Shut doesnt even get a mention, indicating digital correction of many items was already a common thing.
I also heard the reason Hudson Hawk was so ridiculously expensive was Bruce Willis didnt like his hairline in the movie and every single frame of him had to have hair digitally added. That came out years earlier.

That is all. Enjoy.

NSFW

 

[0roo0roo]

kubrik..total perv

 

[CallMeJoe]

Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
kubrik..total perv

If you think Kubrick is a perv, then Brian dePalma must really peg your meter...

 

[Barfo]

Hmmm orgy scene

 

[The Boston Dangler]

once you get past all of the sex and style and mystery, this movie is a flaming pile of crap.

 

[biggestmuff]

Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
once you get past all of the sex and style and mystery, this movie is a flaming pile of crap.

It's a pile with all of that.

I'm a film buff. I really enjoy 2001 and the first act of Full Metal Jacket, but Kubrick's remaining catalog is garbage.

 

[Baked]

Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
once you get past all of the sex and style and mystery, kubrik movies are a flaming pile of crap.

Flame on!

 

[deftron]

Originally posted by: biggestmuff

Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
once you get past all of the sex and style and mystery, this movie is a flaming pile of crap.

It's a pile with all of that.

I'm a film buff. I really enjoy 2001 and the first act of Full Metal Jacket, but Kubrick's remaining catalog is garbage.

You can't a film buff with that statement because Paths of Glory is like the best psychological war film ever (if you liked FMJ first act)

 

[zerocool84]

Originally posted by: deftron

Originally posted by: biggestmuff

Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
once you get past all of the sex and style and mystery, this movie is a flaming pile of crap.

It's a pile with all of that.

I'm a film buff. I really enjoy 2001 and the first act of Full Metal Jacket, but Kubrick's remaining catalog is garbage.

You can't a film buff with that statement because Paths of Glory is like the best psychological war film ever (if you liked FMJ first act)

2001 sucked as well

 

[The Boston Dangler]

Originally posted by: zerocool84

Originally posted by: deftron

Originally posted by: biggestmuff

Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
once you get past all of the sex and style and mystery, this movie is a flaming pile of crap.

It's a pile with all of that.

I'm a film buff. I really enjoy 2001 and the first act of Full Metal Jacket, but Kubrick's remaining catalog is garbage.

You can't a film buff with that statement because Paths of Glory is like the best psychological war film ever (if you liked FMJ first act)

2001 sucked as well

it gets worse every time i see it. no way could i sit thru most of it, now. i could watch fmj every day - that and goodfellas

 

[imported_Imp]

Originally posted by: Gothgar

Originally posted by: Throckmorton
Leelee who? How do people know the names of all these thousands of actors?

I swear one of my friends know literally every actor ever. It is creepy we'll all be hanging around drinking beers, some random movie will come up, and all we have to do is look at him and he'll tell you they actor's name and other info.... it's so weird, but funny at the same time.

I know too many for my own good, but so do most people who regularly watch TV and movies. They're practically "royalty" in the West, and they have separate shows just to update you on what they're doing.

Anyways, I've seen a large portion of 'A Clockwork Orange', but still can't force myself to see 'Eyes Wide Shut'. Hell, I've even seen 'Vanilla Sky'.

 

[CallMeJoe]

Originally posted by: biggestmuff
I'm a film buff. I really enjoy 2001 and the first act of Full Metal Jacket, but Kubrick's remaining catalog is garbage.

Paths of Glory?

Lolita?

Dr. Strangelove?

A Clockwork Orange?

Have you no taste at all?

 

[zerocool84]

Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler

Originally posted by: zerocool84

Originally posted by: deftron

Originally posted by: biggestmuff

Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
once you get past all of the sex and style and mystery, this movie is a flaming pile of crap.

It's a pile with all of that.

I'm a film buff. I really enjoy 2001 and the first act of Full Metal Jacket, but Kubrick's remaining catalog is garbage.

You can't a film buff with that statement because Paths of Glory is like the best psychological war film ever (if you liked FMJ first act)

2001 sucked as well

it gets worse every time i see it. no way could i sit thru most of it, now. i could watch fmj every day - that and goodfellas

FMJ is just an awesome movie