In case some of you dont know, the Supreme Court has already ruled on abortion. Also, Republicans are slimy bastards.

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,080
136

They break the law repeatedly hoping a new mix of justices MIGHT back them up whenever the case makes it to the supreme court.
I'm of the opinion bills like that should be automatically voided until after they get it thru the supreme court.


Its a federal RIGHT. You can't take it away on a state by state basis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captante

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,115
29,271
136

They break the law repeatedly hoping a new mix of justices MIGHT back them up whenever the case makes it to the supreme court.
I'm of the opinion bills like that should be automatically voided until after they get it thru the supreme court.


Its a federal RIGHT. You can't take it away on a state by state basis.
You can if you pack enough federalist society kooks into the court.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
8,027
8,794
136
If a pregnant woman attempts suicide, with her and the fetus surviving, should the pregnant woman be charged with and convicted of attempted murder?

If a pregnant woman attempts suicide, with the woman surviving and the fetus dying, should the pregnant woman be charged with and convicted of murder?

If the answer to those questions is no, then like it looks like on the "surface" and internally, it's the woman's fucking body and it's her choice of what she wants inside her body.

To meet the forced-birth people half-way, once the fetus is viable, then the state MUST pay for any and all costs of the pregnant woman, including all medical care, shelter, costs, food, etc., since at that point the state is treating the mother like an incubator.

If you're going to force a woman to do something with her body, then I believe that would fall under the 5th Amendment takings clause, “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

I think a woman's uterus should qualify as private property, and the state is unequivocally commandeering that thing for public use if they're limiting what the woman can do with it.

That's about as far as you need to go to "negotiate" on this shit. If the state is going to take a woman's uterus and do with it what it wants, then it better be paying up for it.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,234
16,543
136
If a pregnant woman attempts suicide, with her and the fetus surviving, should the pregnant woman be charged with and convicted of attempted murder?

If a pregnant woman attempts suicide, with the woman surviving and the fetus dying, should the pregnant woman be charged with and convicted of murder?

If the answer to those questions is no, then like it looks like on the "surface" and internally, it's the woman's fucking body and it's her choice of what she wants inside her body.

To meet the forced-birth people half-way, once the fetus is viable, then the state MUST pay for any and all costs of the pregnant woman, including all medical care, shelter, costs, food, etc., since at that point the state is treating the mother like an incubator.

If you're going to force a woman to do something with her body, then I believe that would fall under the 5th Amendment takings clause, “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

I think a woman's uterus should qualify as private property, and the state is unequivocally commandeering that thing for public use if they're limiting what the woman can do with it.

That's about as far as you need to go to "negotiate" on this shit. If the state is going to take a woman's uterus and do with it what it wants, then it better be paying up for it.

And you know damn well no anti choice supporter supports helping the woman or the baby in any such way.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
8,027
8,794
136
And you know damn well no anti choice supporter supports helping the woman or the baby in any such way.
Bingo. There is no negotiating with the forced-birth people. That's the point of my writing exercise.

I can come up with, what I believe is, a fair negotiation on abortion. Once a fetus becomes viable outside the womb, then no abortion, but since you're going to be taking that woman's fetus against her will, you're going to pay for it.

(Most) Forced-birth people aren't in this for saving babies. They're in it to punish women. Otherwise, they'd be doing a lot more than holding up signs when it's nice outside to harass women. They'd be throwing their bodies in the gears of "baby murder". And...they don't do that. Because ultimately they know it's a clump of cells that they'd wipe on a tissue if it fell out of their nose.
 

weblooker2021

Senior member
Jan 18, 2021
749
254
96
Yes they have and with 6-3 conservative court, they might decide to overturn their previous ruling.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
14,669
9,559
136

They break the law repeatedly hoping a new mix of justices MIGHT back them up whenever the case makes it to the supreme court.

Well, that's pretty clearly the game-plan.

I'm of the opinion bills like that should be automatically voided until after they get it thru the supreme court.


Its a federal RIGHT. You can't take it away on a state by state basis.

But that's just like, your opinion, man. And your opinion only means anything if you happen to be a Supreme Court Justice. Seems daft to me that a supposed democracy gives so much power to the opinions of a tiny group of individiuals, but that's the system you have.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,067
19,775
146
You seriously dont know?

edit: I wasn't really sure how to respond to you. Here it is tho, yes....in my adult life I took some time to review what happened, and agree overall with the SCOTUS ruling. In my upbringing, roe vs wade was only discussed in the context of judicial activism (if discussed at all) and how women's rights was a nasty thing. I was more curious what that particular poster I quoted had to say.
 
Last edited:

Viper1j

Diamond Member
Jul 31, 2018
4,416
4,091
136

They break the law repeatedly hoping a new mix of justices MIGHT back them up whenever the case makes it to the supreme court.
I'm of the opinion bills like that should be automatically voided until after they get it thru the supreme court.


Its a federal RIGHT. You can't take it away on a state by state basis.

Considering the states that border Arkansas, road trips will be a problem.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,254
136

They break the law repeatedly hoping a new mix of justices MIGHT back them up whenever the case makes it to the supreme court.
I'm of the opinion bills like that should be automatically voided until after they get it thru the supreme court.


Its a federal RIGHT. You can't take it away on a state by state basis.
There should be real consequences for knowingly passing illegal legislation.

Also more proof Republicans love activist judges, but only when they rule on their side.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
25,301
14,792
136

They break the law repeatedly hoping a new mix of justices MIGHT back them up whenever the case makes it to the supreme court.
I'm of the opinion bills like that should be automatically voided until after they get it thru the supreme court.


Its a federal RIGHT. You can't take it away on a state by state basis.
I mean ... If I were women there, Id just stop fucking. Full stop. Or demand that their men be fixed - AND have a 'fixed' certificate ready for inspection.
I mean, for the most part the snip can be reversed right? For the most part?
 

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,527
9,498
136

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,111
136
And you know damn well no anti choice supporter supports helping the woman or the baby in any such way.
Bullshit. My wife and I are pro-life and have put our money to help women in bad situations so they can keep their babies.
I also think we should have a gov't program to help in the same situation. Who cares what duplicitous conservatives do anyways.


If a pregnant woman spontaneously aborts will God be sued?
Someday, in my dreams, people will stop asking this idiotic question.
 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
Texas legislator introduces bill to charge women with death penalty if they have an abortion. The law also calls on the state Attorney General to enforce the law no matter what federal laws or court rulings say.


Pro life, my ass
How vicious are these individuals? Good lord.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
36,949
32,164
136
Bullshit. My wife and I are pro-life and have put our money to help women in bad situations so they can keep their babies.
I also think we should have a gov't program to help in the same situation. Who cares what duplicitous conservatives do anyways.



Someday, in my dreams, people will stop asking this idiotic question.
Someday, in my dreams, people will stop pretending to believe an embryo is as sacred as a person.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,234
16,543
136
Bullshit. My wife and I are pro-life and have put our money to help women in bad situations so they can keep their babies.
I also think we should have a gov't program to help in the same situation. Who cares what duplicitous conservatives do anyways.



Someday, in my dreams, people will stop asking this idiotic question.

Well shit! I suggest you stop wasting time on a political forum and get out there to help the millions of women in need. Or do you think your token measures address the overall point being made? Here’s a hint: it doesn’t and there isn’t enough people like you to fully address the problem. So what politicians have you supported that have tried to address the issue legislatively speaking?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,122
9,246
136
I'm confused, if you don't want an abortion, don't get one. Why are so many people hell bent on being idiots?

Because it is a question of murder. It's not what you do to or for yourself. It is for the child involved in that decision.
 

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,111
136
Someday, in my dreams, people will stop pretending to believe an embryo is as sacred as a person.
There's a difference between wanting people to stop asking questions with no answer vs asking someone to change their belief system.