- Oct 9, 1999
- 46,873
- 10,668
- 147
And yet you bill yourself here as Fanatical Meat!My wife likes the women to be manhandled or yelled at quite aggressively. Not really my thing.
And yet you bill yourself here as Fanatical Meat!My wife likes the women to be manhandled or yelled at quite aggressively. Not really my thing.
And yet you bill yourself here as Fanatical Meat!![]()
You know how I know I'm not addicted? I have never even once contemplated something like this:
So you have to seduce yourself before you jerk off?, that's different..That's some crafty wordplay just to distinguish between obsession and addiction and using a speciific qualifier
Switch the noun with video games and the professor would be justifiably torn apart. A video addict in Korea who just gamed without end for 3 days or 7 days would never report it as an addiction but if he drops dead....it's kind of obvious the level of self-harm is far greater than his own perception of his addiction.
Me, I'll probably never really bother with hardcore porn.
Yeah, I've watched some video from pornos...but strictly in the "seduction phase". I don't have interest in the jerky phase and probably never will. So, I consider myself clean of addiction from porn or alcohol or the usual vices.
There are people with a shoe fetish, literally addicted to smelling and licking shoes. That doesn't mean we should ban shoes, or that shoes are the problem.I don't really get these people who think porn is harmless. If you can't stop watching porn, for say six months, then you're addicted.
"And just because watching porn releases pleasure-inducing neurotransmitters or changes the structure of our brain, that also doesn’t mean it’s addictive." Haha, right. I'd be willing to bet my former therapist, an addiction specialist, would think otherwise. "Oh people just do it because it makes them feel good," he says. Lmao yeah and that's why people do drugs too.
I don't really get these people who think porn is harmless. If you can't stop watching porn, for say six months, then you're addicted.
I knew a guy who was, (back a ways when Ebay let you sell anything) selling his wife's used panties, (she was pretty hot) and making good dime doing it. I guess the thing was to sniff them during masturbation to "enhance" the experience.There are people with a shoe fetish, literally addicted to smelling and licking shoes. That doesn't mean we should ban shoes, or that shoes are the problem.
Seriously, if you don't quickly get bored of watching a ton of porn, the problem isn't porn per se, it's you. You may just need to get out more, you know?
Some folks smoke way too much pot than is good for them. Other folks are serious alcoholics. That doesn't mean we should criminalize the use of either.
None of this is to say that the entire porn "industry" is a lovely enterprise full of high minded people, or that some, if not many of the women who turn to porn don't have serious emotional problems.
It just means that, historically, trying to legislate morality has never really worked well.
Criminalization merely means the government's policing arm can get involved. De-stigmatization or removing the taboo on something is entirely another matter and not necessarily tied with decriminalization. Something like cigarettes should be taboo because they provide no benefit but a reliable income stream to the manufacturers and the medical system.There are people with a shoe fetish, literally addicted to smelling and licking shoes. That doesn't mean we should ban shoes, or that shoes are the problem.
Seriously, if you don't quickly get bored of watching a ton of porn, the problem isn't porn per se, it's you. You may just need to get out more, you know?
Some folks smoke way too much pot than is good for them. Other folks are serious alcoholics. That doesn't mean we should criminalize the use of either.
None of this is to say that the entire porn "industry" is a lovely enterprise full of high minded people, or that some, if not many of the women who turn to porn don't have serious emotional problems.
It just means that, historically, trying to legislate morality has never really worked well.
Yeah that is a good point. But I wasn't saying we should ban pornography. My post was more a reaction to people (like the guy in that article from the OP) denying that porn addiction is a thing, or that there's nothing wrong with a porn addiction.There are people with a shoe fetish, literally addicted to smelling and licking shoes. That doesn't mean we should ban shoes, or that shoes are the problem.
Seriously, if you don't quickly get bored of watching a ton of porn, the problem isn't porn per se, it's you. You may just need to get out more, you know?
Some folks smoke way too much pot than is good for them. Other folks are serious alcoholics. That doesn't mean we should criminalize the use of either.
None of this is to say that the entire porn "industry" is a lovely enterprise full of high minded people, or that some, if not many of the women who turn to porn don't have serious emotional problems.
It just means that, historically, trying to legislate morality has never really worked well.
Based on your logic, everyone who's in a sexual relationship, and has sex on a regular basis is by your definition, a sex addict.I don't really get these people who think porn is harmless. If you can't stop watching porn, for say six months, then you're addicted.
