IMAGECAST

[Raju420]

anybody has experience with this? would like some feed back.

 

[Raju420]

bump

 

[uncouth]

I also need some info on this subject 🙁
bump for a good topic

 

[JackBurton]

What do you need to know about it? I used it a loooong time ago so I'll see what I can do.

 

[Raju420]

well i have tried playing around with it, what would u ptefer, GHOST 2001 or Imagecast.

 

[Agamar]

I use it every day, what do you want to know?

 

[Raju420]

i wana know what would you prefer GHOST 2001 or Imagecast and why?

 

[overmars]

You should try ImageCast (IC3) before you make a decision between the two. The demo is here:
IC3

 

[Raju420]

i know i have tried it, but i would like some peoples feedback on it.

 

[JackBurton]

Well, the version of ImageCast that I used awhile back ago didn't have CD-RW support, Ghost 2001 does. This comes in handy when you do a install you OS, Office and all the up to date drivers and burn the image to CD. All you need to ONE CD with a compressed image on it. If you had the choice between ImageCast and Ghost 2001, I definitely go for 2001. It just has alot more options. 😉

 

[Raju420]

with imagecast cast i noticed one thing that you can actually make images of the apps you want to install, so it would make one image file just for the apps, does ghost 2001 also do that?

 

[Raju420]

bump

 

[overmars]

I read a similar post at tek-tips.com and it depends on what you'll use it for. The general consensus was that for mapping images across a network, Imagecast is supposedly faster. But for just personal use, Norton Ghost is more practical.

 

[Raju420]

thanx, it helped me alot, some how i ran into a program called desktop dna, which is compatiable with imagecast, i think i am gona go with that, thanx ya'll.