Originally posted by: bleeb
1. If you don't agree with yourself initially, you are f*cked.
8. If you want to tick them off, you need to elevate their emotions. (ie call them ignorant, racist, you don't debate with people who are intellectually challenged.)
Originally posted by: TommyVercetti
Originally posted by: bleeb
1. If you don't agree with yourself initially, you are f*cked.
8. If you want to tick them off, you need to elevate their emotions. (ie call them ignorant, racist, you don't debate with people who are intellectually challenged.)
That's not good advice, that is name calling.
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Please someone help!
Originally posted by: hypersonic5
What's next, people asking for guides on how to speak?
Originally posted by: CadetLee
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Please someone help!
If you fit into the following categories, you'll probably win:
Pro-choice
Anti-gun
Anti-bush
Anti-SUV
Anti-rice
😛
Originally posted by: lirion
Originally posted by: CadetLee
Originally posted by: Riprorin
Please someone help!
If you fit into the following categories, you'll probably win:
Pro-choice
Anti-gun
Anti-bush
Anti-SUV
Anti-rice
😛
You forgot Anti-God😉
I am tooooooooootally guilty of doing this. I've done it only in situations where the poster portrayed himself as a moral-high-ground-taker, but I found it necessary to let him know that if he was criticizing me for my actions, his slate had better be clean of similar actions on his part.Originally posted by: TommyVercetti
Worst yet, some people find previous threads, just to embarass that person.
Nonsense.Originally posted by: Trinitron
Post fact. After reading OT for over three years now I can tell you 95% of the responses to the facts that you post will be flames, unrelated to the topic, or just false information. Post what you know to be true, the other guy can accept ir or reject it. Good luck on changing anyones mind on this forum though, and 95% of the time if a person is wrong they will not admit it, even if they know they are wrong.
There are no debates here just arguments.
Originally posted by: jumpr
I am tooooooooootally guilty of doing this. I've done it only in situations where the poster portrayed himself as a moral-high-ground-taker, but I found it necessary to let him know that if he was criticizing me for my actions, his slate had better be clean of similar actions on his part.Originally posted by: TommyVercetti
Worst yet, some people find previous threads, just to embarass that person.
more smarter, eh?Originally posted by: TommyVercetti
Anti-God people will always win, because they are so much more smarter and intellectual.