I am on vacation this week and I finally got a PCI-e Mobo to use with my S754 3000+ (@ 2.4 Ghz) and 2X 1GB OCZ 2,3,2,5. The motherboard is currently running in my sons rig with a 16MB PCI card. I am slightly concerned since I can't run my sons Sempron 3100+ @ 2250 mhz like it was before (before it was at Vcore + %3.1, now Vcore is at + %5) so I can't say that I will actually be running at 2.4Ghz. I am using a 20.1" Samsung LCD (204B) so 1600 X 1200 is a possibility (I am gaming at 1024x768 for the meanwhile).
Whew... I have been trying to catch up on the latest video cards, but one can only do so much. From what I have read, the X1950 XTX core is the same as the X1900 XTX core. It is supposed to be a 90nm core and NOT the 80nm most people seem to have expected. I have noted where the inquirer states the performance difference as %7 (how they would know that I don't know, no details were given). I don't plan on waiting for a DX10 card since my games and video card upgrades are few and far between. Typically I use a video card for about 2 years. I plan on keeping my CPU and mobo until a 64bit Windows OS is readily available (2nd Q '07?).
Got all of that? So, should I try and wait a few more weeks for the 1950? Or just get the 1900 and be happy now (it is truly an 'instant gratification' world we live in
). I should mention that the fan noise from my 6800GT is the loudest part of my system. Within two months the A/C's of the house will be turned off, and I will start hearing it again. How noisy is a X 1900XTX compared to a 6800 GT? I have seen the new cooler design on the 1950 and it is supposed to be improved, but no word on noise yet.
-Thanks in advance for any help and insight you guys can give, Ken.
1) I know my system is 'lacking' but, X1900 XTX now or X1950 XTX in the future?
2) How noisy are either of those? (I am using a 6800GT as a reference and it is loud to me).
3) Any suggestions on a quality aftermarket cooler? I have used plenty of Arctic Silencers in the past, but is the Zalman line better?
If the 1950 was available today, I wouldn't ask these questions. But, since I have the time to 'tinker' with my systems this week (I'm on vacation), I'd like to get going soon. I also assume that a X 1900XTX is leaps and bounds above my 6800GT (which never seemed to run BF2 that well).
Whew... I have been trying to catch up on the latest video cards, but one can only do so much. From what I have read, the X1950 XTX core is the same as the X1900 XTX core. It is supposed to be a 90nm core and NOT the 80nm most people seem to have expected. I have noted where the inquirer states the performance difference as %7 (how they would know that I don't know, no details were given). I don't plan on waiting for a DX10 card since my games and video card upgrades are few and far between. Typically I use a video card for about 2 years. I plan on keeping my CPU and mobo until a 64bit Windows OS is readily available (2nd Q '07?).
Got all of that? So, should I try and wait a few more weeks for the 1950? Or just get the 1900 and be happy now (it is truly an 'instant gratification' world we live in
-Thanks in advance for any help and insight you guys can give, Ken.
1) I know my system is 'lacking' but, X1900 XTX now or X1950 XTX in the future?
2) How noisy are either of those? (I am using a 6800GT as a reference and it is loud to me).
3) Any suggestions on a quality aftermarket cooler? I have used plenty of Arctic Silencers in the past, but is the Zalman line better?
If the 1950 was available today, I wouldn't ask these questions. But, since I have the time to 'tinker' with my systems this week (I'm on vacation), I'd like to get going soon. I also assume that a X 1900XTX is leaps and bounds above my 6800GT (which never seemed to run BF2 that well).