• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

I'm reading Grisham's Pelican Brief....

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm about three quarters in where they reveal who the killer is.

Let me get this straight. Some regional rich dude gets denied to drill oil due to environmentalists and he decides to murder two liberal US Supreme Justices in case the trial gets repealed to supreme court?

WTF??? What kind of stupid ass premise is that? If you're that powerful, why don't you just murder the two environmentalists instead?

Plausibility fail. Oh and don't spoil the ending yet, I haven't finished the book yet.
 
Originally posted by: Clair de Lune
I'm about three quarters in where they reveal who the killer is.

Let me get this straight. Some regional rich dude gets denied to drill oil due to environmentalists and he decides to murder two liberal US Supreme Justices in case the trial gets repealed to supreme court?

WTF??? What kind of stupid ass premise is that? If you're that powerful, why don't you just murder the two environmentalists instead?

Plausibility fail. Oh and don't spoil the ending yet, I haven't finished the book yet.

How can there be any spoilers? Welcome to 1992!

The story begins with the assassination of two philosophically divergent Supreme Court Justices. Liberal Justice Rosenberg is killed at his home, while the conservative Justice Jenson is killed inside a porn theatre. The circumstances surrounding their deaths, as well as the deaths themselves, shock and confuse a politically divided nation.

While the public speculates about who may have killed them and why, the main character, Darby Shaw, a Tulane University Law School student, decides to research the two justices' records and cases pending before the Court, suspecting the real motive might be simple greed, not politics. She writes a legal brief speculating that the assassinations were committed on behalf of Victor Mattiece, an oil tycoon wanting to drill for oil on Louisiana swamp land which is a major habitat of an endangered breed of pelicans. A court case on appeal, filed on his behalf to gain access to the land, is expected to make its way to the Supreme Court.

The two slain justices had a history of environmentalism ? their only common view ? and thus Darby surmises that Mattiece, who has a pre-existing business relationship with the President, hoped to turn the case in his favor by eliminating two justices, thus leaving his friend the President in a position to appoint new justices more likely to rule in his favor.

Darby shows the brief, which becomes known as the 'Pelican Brief' to her law professor/mentor/lover, Thomas Callahan, who shows it to his Washington-based friend, Gavin Verheek, a lawyer working for the FBI. Both men are killed soon after.

Afraid that she will become the next target, Darby goes on the run. Eventually, she contacts the Washington Post reporter Gray Grantham, and the two set out to prove her brief correct.

The various parties quickly take sides. The President and his Chief of Staff try to cover up his connection to Mattiece, which would be politically damaging. The FBI wants to bring in Darby to protect her and to verify her story. Allies of Mattiece try to kill her to make sure the cover-up holds.

Eventually, every piece of the story is in place. Grantham obtains videotaped testimony from a pseudonymous lawyer named "Garcia", as well as a document that points to involvement by Garcia's law firm which worked for Mattiece. With this evidence, Grantham and Darby approach the Post chief editor. The story appears in the next edition with front page photographs of Fletcher Coal (the aforementioned Chief of Staff), Mattiece, etc. FBI chief Denton Voyles is ecstatic and shows up at Coal's residence early in the morning to confront him.

Darby crisscrosses the country, then reaches an island in the Caribbean Sea, where Grantham eventually joins her.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Pelican_Brief
 
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Clair de Lune


Plausibility fail. Oh and don't spoil the ending yet, I haven't finished the book yet.

Julia Roberts dies.

....I think. or maybe not
After many meaningful looks, I think she and denzel ride (fly?) off into the sunset and have babies.

This is one the rare cases where the movie is almost as good as the book.
 
Originally posted by: seemingly random
This is one the rare cases where the movie is almost as good as the book.

Uhhh you sure about that? I just finished the book and I'm 15 mins into the movie. It looks terrible so far.

*Khamel is supposed to be an utterly feared mysterious middle-eastern assassin. In the movie, they used some sissy ass white guy with really soft features. WTF?

*I was looking forward seeing the calculating, insidious and experienced Chief of Staff Fletcher Coals, who puppeteers the president. In the movie Coals is a 20 years younger twit who takes the backseat of the president.

*The acting is terrible, at some scenes you can feel the awkwardness.

--will keep on watching however. One thing though, Denzel is one bad ass motherfucker as always. Damn I got a man crush on him. He kicks ass now and did 16 years ago in the movie.
 
Originally posted by: Clair de Lune
Originally posted by: seemingly random
This is one the rare cases where the movie is almost as good as the book.

Uhhh you sure about that? I just finished the book and I'm 15 mins into the movie. It looks terrible so far.

*Khamel is supposed to be an utterly feared mysterious middle-eastern assassin. In the movie, they used some sissy ass white guy with really soft features. WTF?

*I was looking forward seeing the calculating, insidious and experienced Chief of Staff Fletcher Coals, who puppeteers the president. In the movie Coals is a 20 years younger twit who takes the backseat of the president.

*The acting is terrible, at some scenes you can feel the awkwardness.

--will keep on watching however. One thing though, Denzel is one bad ass motherfucker as always. Damn I got a man crush on him. He kicks ass now and did 16 years ago in the movie.
No, but if you didn't like the premise of the book, you probably won't like the movie. If I remember correctly, this one was the weakest grisham movie. The romance didn't work, imo. I was probably thinking of "a time to kill" and "the firm". imo, there were weak moments in both but not many.

trivia: I talked to a guy on a plane who said that he sat next to grisham on a flight once - said he's a pretty down-to-earth guy.

Denzel is the closest thing to a god I can think of. Check out "man on fire" among his many.
 
No I enjoyed the book overall, despite the glaring implausibility I mentioned in OP.

The movie is just bad. I'm about to stop watching it. Denzel is the only thing keeps me at it (seriously).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top