is that the rule of thumb? Income x 2 = house value?
I seem to remember hearing about income x3 plus 20% down for the mortgage. Of course interest rates were much higher then.
is that the rule of thumb? Income x 2 = house value?
LOL everyone look at the cute child trying to play finance. It's sweet that he thinks he knows what he's talking about.
Care to share how he is wrong? As far as i know he is correct. You stop making mortgage payments and the bank will take the home from you. So how is it the person owns the home and not the bank?
It is the same thing with cars. Stop making payments and the bank comes to take it. You can fight all you want to say you own it, but you dont until its paid off.
Care to share how he is wrong? As far as i know he is correct. You stop making mortgage payments and the bank will take the home from you. So how is it the person owns the home and not the bank?
It is the same thing with cars. Stop making payments and the bank comes to take it. You can fight all you want to say you own it, but you dont until its paid off.
Technically you own the house, and the bank uses your agreement to take it from you.
Care to share how he is wrong? As far as i know he is correct. You stop making mortgage payments and the bank will take the home from you. So how is it the person owns the home and not the bank?
It is the same thing with cars. Stop making payments and the bank comes to take it. You can fight all you want to say you own it, but you dont until its paid off.
I'm in a similar position, only I'm trying to buy a house cash. I hear it gives me a lot of "power" as far as bargaining, but damn is it hard enough just to find something you want even near the figure you had in mind.
It really doesn't. Put yourself in the vendors shoes - they don't give a shit how you're paying for it, as long as they get their money on settlement day. It makes literally zero difference if you're a cash buyer, other than you're less likely to enter into a conditional agreement on finance.
Is this the same house that you took a dump in?Just put an offer in on one myself. Can't wait to hear back and get things going.
Is this the same house that you took a dump in?
Actually, you're technically not an "owner" until you pay off the Mortgage. The bank owns your home. They're just letting you live there as long as you keep making the payments.
You are wrong. They own the mortgage, not the house.
Technically you own the house, and the bank uses your agreement to take it from you.
A mortgage loan is a loan secured by real property through the use of a mortgage note which evidences the existence of the loan and the encumbrance of that realty through the granting of a mortgage which secures the loan. However, the word mortgage alone, in everyday usage, is most often used to mean mortgage loan.
The word mortgage is a Law French term meaning "death contract," meaning that the pledge ends (dies) when either the obligation is fulfilled or the property is taken through foreclosure.[1]
A home buyer or builder can obtain financing (a loan) either to purchase or secure against the property from a financial institution, such as a bank, either directly or indirectly through intermediaries. Features of mortgage loans such as the size of the loan, maturity of the loan, interest rate, method of paying off the loan, and other characteristics can vary considerably.
In many jurisdictions, though not all (Bali, Indonesia being one exception[2]), it is normal for home purchases to be funded by a mortgage loan. Few individuals have enough savings or liquid funds to enable them to purchase property outright. In countries where the demand for home ownership is highest, strong domestic markets have developed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortgage_loans
Bank owns the mortgage loan to the house, if said "owner" fails their obligation in paying this loan it ends up as a foreclosure.
So how come a lot of these houses end up loosing their original value after a few years and "owner" decides to bail/default on their mortgage loan, does that mean they don't "own" the house anymore?![]()
15 year is a bad choice, esp if you 'plan to pay off in 10'...sadly most go into a mortgage thinking this. You can always pay more on a 30 year loan, but never less on a 15 year each month.
15 year is a bad choice, esp if you 'plan to pay off in 10'...sadly most go into a mortgage thinking this. You can always pay more on a 30 year loan, but never less on a 15 year each month.
15 year is a bad choice, esp if you 'plan to pay off in 10'...sadly most go into a mortgage thinking this. You can always pay more on a 30 year loan, but never less on a 15 year each month.
I would imagine payments to be quite high on a 15 year. I have a 25 year and the minimum is 400 bi-weekly. I recently raised it to 450. I have 16 years left according to the status in my online banking. The biweekly alone knocks off quite a few years, and now I'm paying more. Better to go with something affordable, and just put more on if you can, but at least if you can't, you keep the house.
Difference between 15yr and 30yr payment isn't that much.
...
If something comes up and you cant afford 15, then 30 wouldve been the same. .
Difference between 15yr and 30yr payment isn't that much. My sister did 30yr initially with plans to pay extra but never did. She's the type who won't save unless you force her. After couple of years, I had her refi to 15yr since the new rates were so low. Her new payment was only slightly higher than her old. She's already couple years into her 15yr and her house will be paid off when she's in her 40s. If you don't overextend yourself and buy more house than you can afford, 15 yr should be no problem. If something comes up and you cant afford 15, then 30 wouldve been the same. Instead of using 30yr as base for how much house you can afford, just use 15.
You have no idea what you're talking about. They payment differences are huge. For example on a $250k loan at 4% the payments over 30 years are $550 per fortnight, where over 15 years it's $850 per fortnight. That's a fucking huge difference to most people.
noHow does that work? If it's 1/2 the amount of time wouldn't the payment have to be double?
