I understand its nice to provide some very concrete lessons on the outcomes of unrestricted capitalism, but lets make those that are responsible pay the price for those lessons, not the innocent bystanders.thats capitalism.
I understand its nice to provide some very concrete lessons on the outcomes of unrestricted capitalism, but lets make those that are responsible pay the price for those lessons, not the innocent bystanders.thats capitalism.
If you call overcooked with ketchup perfection.
Yes & no, it would drive up rent prices and landlords would just cherry pick high credit score low debt renters.
Back of the napkin math looks like seventy trillion dollars minimum per generation. That's a lot of trillions.Basic Income allows a "nest egg" to build up each month from the day of birth. By the time a person is 18, they can single handedly pay cash for a home. Double it with a partner involved and they are set for starting a good life. Rent and Mortgage free. Add on top of that a federal housing program... where in exchange for a portion of the Basic Income, that guaranteed revenue is used to guarantee a "loan" on the home. Rent becomes universally eliminated for the poorer half of the nation. Ownership, guaranteed, becomes a universal standard.
Basic Income allows a "nest egg" to build up each month from the day of birth. By the time a person is 18, they can single handedly pay cash for a home. Double it with a partner involved and they are set for starting a good life. Rent and Mortgage free. Add on top of that a federal housing program... where in exchange for a portion of the Basic Income, that guaranteed revenue is used to guarantee a "loan" on the home. Rent becomes universally eliminated for the poorer half of the nation. Ownership, guaranteed, becomes a universal standard.
I understand its nice to provide some very concrete lessons on the outcomes of unrestricted capitalism, but lets make those that are responsible pay the price for those lessons, not the innocent bystanders.
I was under the impression children couldn't vote.They voted for starvation.
I was under the impression children couldn't vote.
And you're a sick bastard if you really believe that.The parents voted to have the children starve. So we let them starve. They will be malnourished and dumb and vote more against their interests and it will become a infinite loop of deevolution.
And you're a sick bastard if you really believe that.
All the wrongs.So should we mobilize to fix all the wrongs or only the wrongs white kids face?
I'm unclear as to the point you're trying to make here."Why are they voting against their own interests? They should vote for Democrats"
![]()
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I'm unclear as to the point you're trying to make here.
How do you suggest we fix it? Should we take away their freedom to vote stupidly?All the wrongs.
I don't think saying fuck white kids helps that situation.
This is the perfect opportunity for the Democrats to attempt to educate: Trump brought you hunger, higher taxes and seems willing to start a war your sons will have to fight. Maybe you should vote for the party that wants to help your family survive.
But gloating, regardless of how justified Dems may feel in doing so, won't help those republican voters who are suffering see the light. I hope Dems want votes and the White House more than they want to say "I told you so." It would be a fucking shame to see Trumps base solidified more than it already is.
No, we don't take away their right to vote. We provide for the basic needs of their children, including strong education that is funded at either the state or national level so that kids growing up in these districts have similar resources for education as kids growing up in wealthy school districts. We provide access for opportunity in these areas (and all areas in our country), either through a government job guarantee or universal basic income (or possibly some combination of the two). We invest in the infrastructure of our country so that kids aren't getting lead poisoning whenever they drink from their cities water supply. We provide universal healthcare for these people. Basically, we continue to strive for the betterment of society, even if it includes the stupid people. All of these are popular ideas. We just need to get people out to vote and get the money out of politics so that we don't have people buying off our politicians and injecting huge amounts of money into political debates in order to sway public opinion away from peoples own best interests.How do you suggest we fix it? Should we take away their freedom to vote stupidly?
Those are all great ideas, but all have been or will be blocked by Repubs, and people in these areas keep voting for them.No, we don't take away their right to vote. We provide for the basic needs of their children, including strong education that is funded at either the state or national level so that kids growing up in these districts have similar resources for education as kids growing up in wealthy school districts. We provide access for opportunity in these areas (and all areas in our country), either through a government job guarantee or universal basic income (or possibly some combination of the two). We invest in the infrastructure of our country so that kids aren't getting lead poisoning whenever they drink from their cities water supply. We provide universal healthcare for these people. Basically, we continue to strive for the betterment of society, even if it includes the stupid people. All of these are popular ideas. We just need to get people out to vote and get the money out of politics so that we don't have people buying off our politicians and injecting huge amounts of money into political debates in order to sway public opinion away from peoples own best interests.
No, we don't take away their right to vote. We provide for the basic needs of their children, including strong education that is funded at either the state or national level so that kids growing up in these districts have similar resources for education as kids growing up in wealthy school districts. We provide access for opportunity in these areas (and all areas in our country), either through a government job guarantee or universal basic income (or possibly some combination of the two). We invest in the infrastructure of our country so that kids aren't getting lead poisoning whenever they drink from their cities water supply. We provide universal healthcare for these people. Basically, we continue to strive for the betterment of society, even if it includes the stupid people. All of these are popular ideas. We just need to get people out to vote and get the money out of politics so that we don't have people buying off our politicians and injecting huge amounts of money into political debates in order to sway public opinion away from peoples own best interests.
So you want to indoctrinate their poor kids with liberal elitist educations and pay for other people's food stamps with taxes on my food stamps? You should probably just move to Venezuela now since you like socialism so much. The rest of those poor people can just win the lottery like I plan to do next week.No, we don't take away their right to vote. We provide for the basic needs of their children, including strong education that is funded at either the state or national level so that kids growing up in these districts have similar resources for education as kids growing up in wealthy school districts. We provide access for opportunity in these areas (and all areas in our country), either through a government job guarantee or universal basic income (or possibly some combination of the two). We invest in the infrastructure of our country so that kids aren't getting lead poisoning whenever they drink from their cities water supply. We provide universal healthcare for these people. Basically, we continue to strive for the betterment of society, even if it includes the stupid people. All of these are popular ideas. We just need to get people out to vote and get the money out of politics so that we don't have people buying off our politicians and injecting huge amounts of money into political debates in order to sway public opinion away from peoples own best interests.
Most will die first before reassessing their choices. I've spent the last year reading stores about farmers who Trump has ruined, some of whom are actively debating literal suicide, but in the next breath defend him. The tribal nature of his appeal is too great.
Stocks are up!

Their parents politely voted to clean the gene pool after themselves. We need to respect that.I was under the impression children couldn't vote.
Those are all great ideas, but all have been or will be blocked by Repubs, and people in these areas keep voting for them.
The question is, why do these people keep voting for the party that will not give them any of what you listed? And how can the Dems convince these people to vote for them?