So what do they define as the owner being present?
Live in the same building or same state or what?
Couldn't this be applied to hotels and such also in this case?
So what do they define as the owner being present?
Live in the same building or same state or what?
Couldn't this be applied to hotels and such also in this case?
It's not a statewide ban on short term rentals, it's a ban on rentals where the owner is not present. The reason for this is primarily NYC, where people are buying up large amounts of properties and converting them into what amount to full time Airbnb hotels. Considering how tight the property market is in NYC this is a big problem. I'm not sure if this is the right solution but something needs to be done.
By the way this law is less nutty than advertised. It only affects apartment buildings. Vacation homes are safe.
The margin on short term rentals is huge in a popular destination like Denver. Rents & property values are already sky-high & this just pushes them higher. It cuts into tax revenues that hotels pay to the state & the city. They're a pita for neighborhoods because people come to party hearty, & they do. The house next door was used as an airbnb for about a year prior to Denver banning the practice. Drunken stoned out idiots whooping it up on the deck was fairly common. Now it's for sale so I'm hoping for better neighbors.
It's a different story in small mountain towns & has been for a long time. They live on tourist dollars, one way or another, and on the imported cash of local retirees. Banning short term rentals wouldn't be good for them at all. It's a big part of where not a helluva lot of money comes from.
