illegal immigrants

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,873
4,985
136
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: pinion9
How many of you live in America and think it is wrong that we "took it" from the Natives? If so, why don't you move to a different country?

"I think it is deplorable what we did to those poor natives, taking their land, raping their children...but hey! What's done is done. What time do we eat?"

Just because they were "here first" doesn't give them any explicit rights to the land. Who gives a $hit? They should have been stronger and defended their country. We took it, fair and square, get over it and go back to your casino.




Jacka$$ and proud of it. Great way to go through life.


Yep, and you are really helping the cause with your lil immature whinny comments, like i said, get over it, minorities should stop asking for handouts and for people to recognize there "in there own mind" plight, and suck it up and get to work, you want something, go out and work for it, stop being a lazy jackass who expects to get by on his race.


What "cause" am I failing to help with my whinny (sic) comments?

Who is asking for handouts?

I have said nothing of the sort.


If you have a problem with minorities, it is YOU thay needs to "get over it".


Read the title of the thread again, and stop putting words in my mouth.

YOU are the one who keeps WHINING.




 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: pinion9
How many of you live in America and think it is wrong that we "took it" from the Natives? If so, why don't you move to a different country?

"I think it is deplorable what we did to those poor natives, taking their land, raping their children...but hey! What's done is done. What time do we eat?"

Just because they were "here first" doesn't give them any explicit rights to the land. Who gives a $hit? They should have been stronger and defended their country. We took it, fair and square, get over it and go back to your casino.




Jacka$$ and proud of it. Great way to go through life.


Yep, and you are really helping the cause with your lil immature whinny comments, like i said, get over it, minorities should stop asking for handouts and for people to recognize there "in there own mind" plight, and suck it up and get to work, you want something, go out and work for it, stop being a lazy jackass who expects to get by on his race.


What "cause" am I failing to help with my whinny (sic) comments?

Who is asking for handouts?

I have said nothing of the sort.


If you have a problem with minorities, it is YOU thay needs to "get over it".


Read the title of the thread again, and stop putting words in my mouth.

YOU are the one who keeps WHINING.

LOL Im not whinning, or replying to every post with some lil shot like you are, grow the hell up, i made my position clear, as have other people, and all you can do is reply and pick what you want out of the post and oversensationalize it.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,873
4,985
136
Originally posted by: RichardE

LOL Im not whinning, or replying to every post with some lil shot like you are, grow the hell up, i made my position clear, as have other people, and all you can do is reply and pick what you want out of the post and oversensationalize it.[/quote]








You're not whining?

Sorry, I mistook phrases such as "Grow the hell up". "Get over it, "Why don't you move to another country" "who gives a $******" "go back to your casino"
"we won it fair and square" as whining.

Obviously they are sagacious gems from a profound and mature mind.


My deepest apologies.

:laugh:



 

RichardE

Banned
Dec 31, 2005
10,246
2
0
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: RichardE

LOL Im not whinning, or replying to every post with some lil shot like you are, grow the hell up, i made my position clear, as have other people, and all you can do is reply and pick what you want out of the post and oversensationalize it.








You're not whining?

Sorry, I mistook phrases such as "Grow the hell up". "Get over it, "Why don't you move to another country" "who gives a $******" "go back to your casino"
"we won it fair and square" as whining.

Obviously they are sagacious gems from a profound and mature mind.


My deepest apologies.

:laugh:



[/quote]

Apology accepted, as my comment were not whinning, but if you need to see them as such all the more power to you. You can go back to your "fighting for the little guy" again.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
I guess the PBS guys never read the Book of Mormon!

In the Book of Mormon there was a group of people called the Jeradites that came to the American Continent after the fall of the Tower of Babel. Jared and his brother were suppose to have been at the Tower of Babel when God Confused the people by giving them different languages. These people were suppose to have killed each other completely.

Then Later a break-off of the Jews came to the Americas around 600 BC when Jerusalem Fell.

So this could mean all of the Indians are just tranplanted Jews and the settlers from Europe were all anti-semetic.

I know I am just being rediculous and this is totally absurd. I dont mean to offend anyone inparticular. However, people in politics tend to do this same exact thing and they think it is perfectly justifiable.

This all leads back to the argument of where did the American Natives come from?

Maybe the people in Alaska were just Russians or some chinese that walked accross the ice. Maybe the people in China who were reported to have built ships over 400 feet long were the people that transplanted Chinese and others around the world. Where did these American Indians (Native Americans) come from in the first place. The Origin of the Races on the earth is such an interesting topic.
 

ViperXX

Platinum Member
Nov 2, 2001
2,058
10
81
Conquered - To defeat or subdue by force, especially by force of arms.

The Native Americans were conquered plain and simple. People have been conquered for ages. It's just the way it works.



 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
The Native Americans were conquered plain and simple. People have been conquered for ages. It's just the way it works.
Exactly...how many cultures, societies and nations have been trampled under foot over the centuries? When the first tribe of primitive man encountered another tribe competing for the same resources, the dynamic was set in motion.

The only thing that makes America unique is that such behavior seems contrary to our values as a nation...slavery, Manifest Destiny and imperialism were not shining moments in American history...then again, America certainly did invent the concept of persecution and elimination of indigenous people...the Europeans were far more ruthless and aggressive in such behavior, as were the Romans, Persians, ancient Greeks and barbarian hordes of Eurasia.

Even the native tribes we conquered in turn exhibited similar behavior against rival tribes.
 

dexvx

Diamond Member
Feb 2, 2000
3,899
0
0
I like how you randomly take a quote and don't even know the context of it.

Then again, that's whats wrong with American politics these days. Take random quotes and put them out of context.
 

judasmachine

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2002
8,515
3
81
Originally posted by: piasabird
I guess the PBS guys never read the Book of Mormon!

In the Book of Mormon there was a group of people called the Jeradites that came to the American Continent after the fall of the Tower of Babel. Jared and his brother were suppose to have been at the Tower of Babel when God Confused the people by giving them different languages. These people were suppose to have killed each other completely.

Then Later a break-off of the Jews came to the Americas around 600 BC when Jerusalem Fell.

So this could mean all of the Indians are just tranplanted Jews and the settlers from Europe were all anti-semetic.

I know I am just being rediculous and this is totally absurd. I dont mean to offend anyone inparticular. However, people in politics tend to do this same exact thing and they think it is perfectly justifiable.

This all leads back to the argument of where did the American Natives come from?

Maybe the people in Alaska were just Russians or some chinese that walked accross the ice. Maybe the people in China who were reported to have built ships over 400 feet long were the people that transplanted Chinese and others around the world. Where did these American Indians (Native Americans) come from in the first place. The Origin of the Races on the earth is such an interesting topic.

I've actually read much of that. It would seem that the Native Americans anthropologically are related to both the modern and historical peoples found in Japan. The natives of the Japanese Islands look caucasion.

 

PatboyX

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2001
7,024
0
0
PBS is a group, not an individual. I seriously doubt they released the quoted statement as part of a PR blitz.
 

Uhtrinity

Platinum Member
Dec 21, 2003
2,263
202
106
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Tell PBS that the Pilgrims didn't invade a sovereign nation.


Tell that to the Native Americans. I have several Native American friends / clients and they would disagree with you wholeheartedly.
 

Uhtrinity

Platinum Member
Dec 21, 2003
2,263
202
106
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Originally posted by: feralkid
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Tell PBS that the Pilgrims didn't invade a sovereign nation.

Tell all of the Native Americans that that makes genocide O.K.

Genocide? I don't think colonizing = genocide. I'd like to see your sources that say that American settlers set out to exterminate the Native American population of America.

And if you're talking about wars, don't bother. The Native American groups fought amongst each other all of the time. It wasn't exactly peaceful on the plains.


But genocide was still the end result. I could say the Europeans were just as brtual with their wars.

Edit: I hate when I post a reply, not realizing the thread is already 2 pages long :)
 

Shuxclams

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
9,286
15
81
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Tell PBS that the Pilgrims didn't invade a sovereign nation.



Actually the Iroquois Confederacy was and still is considered a sovereign nation. The Iroquois Confederacy was actually planning on taking the midwest with an army over 100K strong. Also you would have a hard time convincing the Patuxet and Wampanoag of the age that they werent a sovereign nation. I suppose 3 epidemics, the King James War and the 7 Year war didn't help them much.


Your an a$$











SHUX
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
Originally posted by: TheSlamma
Give them all cards, they are not taking any of the jobs I want and it makes it so companies don't have to go across the border as much.


But they do NEED to be given citizenship, so the repubs don't treat them like slave labor since they can't call the cops.


It's great for you I guess. As a member of the upper middle class you get to enjoy lower-priced goods and services at the expense of Americans who are in the lower classes. If you don't want to pay Americans for their labor (paying them third world wages), yet want the benefits of their labor, why not just be more honest and enslave them?

Of course, if you're not wealthy, you might find yourself on the short end of the stick too when your knowledge-based job is sent off to India or given to an H-1B or L-1. Perhaps you'll even be blackmailed into training your replacement.
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
Originally posted by: ViperXX
Conquered - To defeat or subdue by force, especially by force of arms.

The Native Americans were conquered plain and simple. People have been conquered for ages. It's just the way it works.

They were able to be conquered because their societies were objectively inferior by the standard that reason (as opposed to mysticism), science, and technology are the good.

The American Indian who enjoys today's modern medicines and higher quality of life can thank the Europeans. I can't imagine how hypocritical it must be to type up a post on a computer that explains why the Indians would have been better off without the Europeans. First, just by being alive the person benefits from lower infant mortality rates, and secondly and most obviously, without the Europeans the Indians would never have had computers--not unless they ended up with their very own Indian Aristotle and a Rennaissance.
 

pinion9

Banned
May 5, 2005
1,201
0
0
My only regret is that we didn't kill them all and completely take over the land. We conqueured a "nation" (or several nations, as it were) and let a lot of them live. In retrospect, if we would have simply taken everything and left no one living, then we wouldn't be having this argument and no one would be around to b!tch that we took their land. Now my tax dollars go to support them, give them free medical care, etc. It is BS.

We have a native owned corporation in my town and at the top of their job applications it states in bold "We prefer to hire Native Americans when possible." How can they get away with that? They seem to be above the law with many respects and still want handouts. Just be happy your little tribe is still around. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,873
4,985
136
Originally posted by: pinion9
My only regret is that we didn't kill them all and completely take over the land. We conqueured a "nation" (or several nations, as it were) and let a lot of them live. In retrospect, if we would have simply taken everything and left no one living, then we wouldn't be having this argument and no one would be around to b!tch that we took their land. Now my tax dollars go to support them, give them free medical care, etc. It is BS.

We have a native owned corporation in my town and at the top of their job applications it states in bold "We prefer to hire Native Americans when possible." How can they get away with that? They seem to be above the law with many respects and still want handouts. Just be happy your little tribe is still around. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.




Good one, Mr. Schicklgruber!


Who else should be exterminated, oh wise genocist?
 

lyssword

Diamond Member
Dec 15, 2005
5,630
25
91
Originally posted by: WhipperSnapper
Originally posted by: ViperXX
Conquered - To defeat or subdue by force, especially by force of arms.

The Native Americans were conquered plain and simple. People have been conquered for ages. It's just the way it works.

They were able to be conquered because their societies were objectively inferior by the standard that reason (as opposed to mysticism), science, and technology are the good.

The American Indian who enjoys today's modern medicines and higher quality of life can thank the Europeans. I can't imagine how hypocritical it must be to type up a post on a computer that explains why the Indians would have been better off without the Europeans. First, just by being alive the person benefits from lower infant mortality rates, and secondly and most obviously, without the Europeans the Indians would never have had computers--not unless they ended up with their very own Indian Aristotle and a Rennaissance.

You think that only the europeans contributed to science, math and society? Where is your motherboard/video card made? hmm let me guess, taiwan/china? what bout powersupply? china. Who makes P4 chips? israel. Who is the leader in LCD monitor technology? Korea. What about pc memory? korea. Who are the programmers that make vid games? a lot of them are japanese/asian. Would Bill Gates be able to become rich if he didn't have Indians (the asian india) to invent advanced math formulas/equations? Maybe europe is good at conquering territories, but so probably are many asian countries, like japan/china. Heck, mongols almost conquered the whole eurasian continent.
And advances in medicines came from all over the world. I wouldnt want to be treated by the "advanced" medicine of 1600-1800 of europe in US, where to release the "bad disease" they let out the blood out of people with simple cold. Is USA a great country? no doubt. But you are ignoring all the contributions that so many people from around the world made to US. (Including sizeable exports to other countries). You only seem to think that america became great because of white people.
.
By the way if maybe people would be less ignorant/morons/just-plain-racist folks like some posted in this topic maybe Natives wouldn't complain of racism. Why did they turn this topic into Native-american bashing? Original post by me wasn't to argue who is superior/inferior. Maybe you should read OP again.
Btw, I'm 100% of european descent (and also believe in Christianity)

 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,873
4,985
136
Originally posted by: WhipperSnapper


I can't imagine how hypocritical it must be to type up a post on a computer that explains why the Indians would have been better off without the Europeans.







Uh...who typed such a post?

I can't find the one you are referring to.
 

TheSlamma

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2005
7,625
5
81
Originally posted by: WhipperSnapper
Originally posted by: TheSlamma
Give them all cards, they are not taking any of the jobs I want and it makes it so companies don't have to go across the border as much.


But they do NEED to be given citizenship, so the repubs don't treat them like slave labor since they can't call the cops.


It's great for you I guess. As a member of the upper middle class you get to enjoy lower-priced goods and services at the expense of Americans who are in the lower classes. If you don't want to pay Americans for their labor (paying them third world wages), yet want the benefits of their labor, why not just be more honest and enslave them?

Of course, if you're not wealthy, you might find yourself on the short end of the stick too when your knowledge-based job is sent off to India or given to an H-1B or L-1. Perhaps you'll even be blackmailed into training your replacement.

LOL, you need to read my post and think about it more clearly.
 
Oct 30, 2004
11,442
32
91
Originally posted by: TheSlamma

LOL, you need to read my post and think about it more clearly.

From what I can tell--you're in favor of global labor wage arbitrage. Why else would you want to increase the population of impoverished people by allowing mass immigration of Mexicans?