Ill. lawyer objects to buxom woman at trial table

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
http://www.bnd.com/2011/05/25/17220...html#storylink=omni_popular?storylink=addthis


CHICAGO -- A Chicago lawyer says his opponent in a small claims case is using an unfair tactic by sitting a buxom woman next to him at counsel's table.

Attorney Thomas Gooch says the woman's sole purpose "is to draw the attention of the jury away from the relevant proceedings" - a dispute over a used car. He asks Cook County Circuit Judge Anita Rivkin-Carothers to order the woman to sit in the gallery with other spectators.

In responding to the pretrial motion, attorney Dmitry N. Feofanov said the woman is his paralegal assistant and contends Gooch cites no "good faith legal argument" why she can't sit at counsel's table. Feofanov, who in the past has described himself as a "consumer protection lawyer," asked Rivkin-Carothers to impose sanctions on Gooch for his motion.
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126

Some of us have minds that don`t need pictures to know what the topic is talking about....
 

RedCOMET

Platinum Member
Jul 8, 2002
2,836
0
0
I love that the comments for the article say the article is useless without out Pics.. For a moment, it reminded me of ATOT.
 
Oct 27, 2007
17,009
5
0
Some of us have minds that don`t need pictures to know what the topic is talking about....
You know how I know you're gay?


---------------
Critical PM sent.

Posting privileges are about to be revoked permanently due to failure to understand Mod PMs.

Common Courtesy
AT Admin
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Last edited:

Saint Nick

Lifer
Jan 21, 2005
17,722
6
81
Yay, I'm about to be perma-banned for posting a quote from 40 Year Old Virgin. That certainly seems fair.
Don't worry, I made a crack about allison handing out infractions and I got a warning :rolleyes:

She's a mod...thats why it was supposed to be funny. It was just a joke. They sure are sensitive, aren't they?
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Obviously fail as mentioned.

But I could see that. I'm no lawyer but I think you have to dress like going for chruch in court.
 

sjwaste

Diamond Member
Aug 2, 2000
8,757
12
81
Obviously fail as mentioned.

But I could see that. I'm no lawyer but I think you have to dress like going for chruch in court.

Zebo, the next time you appear in my courtroom, you will wear a suit. And it will be made of some kind of cloth.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Yay, I'm about to be perma-banned for posting a quote from 40 Year Old Virgin. That certainly seems fair.

I like the part where you get quoted by and responded to by a mod in the same jest and they're still ready to drop the banhammer.

  • GA was advised via PM prior to the post by Perknose. I was courteous enough to not issue an infraction or warning.
  • Within GA post; there was no indication of the source or that the post was in jest. Based on his posts; it could be an attack.
  • Given GA track record - he can not afford any mis-steps. Mosquitoes are safer on water than the ice underneath him.

Rather than appreciate the fact that someone trying to help/keep him out of a mess; he publicly complain about it. That is a excellent way to expedite his exit out of AT.



As for the GoodRevrnd; it is advisable to keep your nose out of matters where you do not have all the information to avoid a Mod callout infraction.



Common Courtesy
AT Admin
 
Last edited by a moderator:

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,326
68
91
I better leave this thread before someone embeds a huge buxom woman pic.
 

Jeeebus

Diamond Member
Aug 29, 2006
9,181
901
126
I'm not one to question mod actions (ok, maybe I have been known to do so in the past), but there has to be at least 100 different examples of someone writing "do you know how i know you're gay?" in Off Topic alone.

I'd run the search, but apparently putting " " around a search string doesn't actually search the exact phrase.

Godless certainly has a long track record, but it's not like he's posting something that hasn't been posted at least a hundred times before, presumably without infraction.

You were just given the courtesy of a mere warning for improperly "discussing" mod actions here and not in the only appropriate venue, Moderator Discussions.

Now take some time off.

Furthermore, for all you wannabe mods here, lets review the fact:

1. GA posted "do you know how i know you're gay?" NOTHING happened to him for this, NOT ONE THING, NOT EVEN A WARNING. Got that?

2. GA then posted "Yay, I'm about to be perma-banned for posting a quote from 40 Year Old Virgin. That certainly seems fair." For this he received ONLY A WARNING, no points, nothing more!

3. The GoodRev improperly stuck his nose in this. And he only got a warning. Next time, he gets a vacation.

4. Now Jeeebus, who got only a warning for doing the exact same thing yesterday in another thread, again sticks HIS nose in this business.

5. Folks, if you have a question or a reaction to any mod action -- REAL OR IMAGINED -- the only appropriate place for discussing it is in Mod Discussions.

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jeeebus

Diamond Member
Aug 29, 2006
9,181
901
126


dt.common.streams.StreamServer.cls


http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/...er-objects-to-buxom-woman-at-trial-table.html

Gonna go on the record here with "DO NOT WANT"