If you won the lottery...

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,935
3,914
136
I'd take the lump sum and buy Anandtech. Then I'd lock any thread that didn't discuss how awesome I was or otherwise disagreed with my personal opinions. Then I'd get two chicks at the same time. Pretty sure I could hook that up.
 

microAmp

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2000
5,988
110
106
Originally posted by: dainthomas
I'd take the lump sum and buy Anandtech. Then I'd lock any thread that didn't discuss how awesome I was or otherwise disagreed with my personal opinions. Then I'd get two chicks at the same time. Pretty sure I could hook that up.

The estimate value of this site back in 2000 I believe was close to 100 million. ;)
 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,935
3,914
136
Originally posted by: microAmp
Originally posted by: dainthomas
I'd take the lump sum and buy Anandtech. Then I'd lock any thread that didn't discuss how awesome I was or otherwise disagreed with my personal opinions. Then I'd get two chicks at the same time. Pretty sure I could hook that up.

The estimate value of this site back in 2000 I believe was close to 100 million. ;)

Oops. Oh well, I guess one HardOCP is enough.
 

Anubis

No Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
78,712
427
126
tbqhwy.com
Originally posted by: markgm
This has been discussed a few times, the best thing to do is payments. http://forums.anandtech.com/me...key=y&keyword1=lottery

i thought it was agreed apon that Payments were better if the total ammnt of the lottery was less then like 50mil or so, but anything over that you would be better off taking the lump and investing. like winning a 400 mill multy state one taking the 140 or so mill is better then payments
 

markgm

Diamond Member
Aug 23, 2001
3,291
2
81
I forgot I made a spreadsheet dealing with this. The only thing it's missing is how it would be taxed.
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,066
883
126
Lump sum. Pay off everyone I care about debt, buy a kickass home in New Zealand and start a business there.
 

Beattie

Golden Member
Sep 6, 2001
1,774
0
0
Get the lump sum and invest it properly. You will make far more money that way.

You can do the math for your specific case and figure out which is the best, but I'd bet that it's almost always the lump sum.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
I would need to know the payout.

People going on payments are basically having faith in the system plus nothing affects them to garnish future earnings.

The more the payout is the more likely I would just cash out. For example if I could have 1 billion dollars today or 2 billion paid out over 30 years...I'd sure as hell take the guaranteed money TODAY and think no further.
 
Feb 6, 2007
16,432
1
81
I'm 25 in a couple months, so I figure I'll definitely be around for another 26 years... and I'd still take the lump sum. I used to think that the payments were a better option, but I've since concluded that starting even a modest investment portfolio with the (smaller) lump sum amount will be worth more at the end of 26 years than most anything you can do with the payments. With that sort of scratch, you could live off interest and still be comfortably well off.
 

Pathogen03

Golden Member
May 16, 2004
1,056
0
0
Originally posted by: xeemzor
If you are younger, wouldn't you make more in the end by just investing the lump sum than taking payments?



Significantly.

Assuming a 7% rate of return over 26 years


purely from investing you would be sitting at just shy of 150 million.

more realistically you will invest 20 million of it, buy some property / have fun with the rest.

that 20 million will be at 110m by itself at the end of 26 years.

OR you could take 2 million a year. Up to you. :)