• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

If you won the lottery...

oiprocs

Diamond Member
Jun 20, 2001
3,780
2
0
...would you choose one lump sum or annual payments for 26 years?

If you choose lump sum, you get the cash value of the lottery, which is somewhere around 55%, I think. For example, a $46 million lottery would have a one lump sum value of $26 million. You pay a one time 25% tax on that lump sum value, i.e. you would get $19.5 million.

If you choose annual payments, your first payment is 2.6% of the total amount you won, and increases thereafter by .1% each year until the 26th year, at which point you get the final payment at 5.1% of the total amount. You pay tax annually on the payments you receive.

Edit:
Moved to Off Topic
AnandTech Moderator - RebateMonger
 

randay

Lifer
May 30, 2006
11,018
216
106
payments if you are young. lump sum if you are old. possibly also lump sum if you are young.
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
I can't pass up the lump sum. Who the hell knows what's going 10-15 years from now. I want to enjoy it all, now.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,785
6,345
126
Up here in Canada Lotto winnings are Tax Free, so there's no difference there. However, I'd probably still choose Payments just to protect myself and to keep my spending sane(ish).
 

Finns14

Golden Member
Oct 6, 2005
1,731
1
0
I think you get a lump sump and then just make the money work for you through sound investing.
 

Jeff7181

Lifer
Aug 21, 2002
18,368
11
81
I voted for payments because I wouldn't want all the money all at once. If I suddenly have $20 million I'd be more likely to piss it away.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,295
14,712
146
Once upon a time, I'd have taken the payments, because you do end up getting a larger amount that way, but nowadays, I'm too dammed old, and probably won't be around for 26 more years, so when I play the Lotto, it's for the lump-sum amount.
 
Oct 4, 2004
10,515
6
81
$1,196,000.00
$1,242,000.00
$1,288,000.00
$1,334,000.00
$1,380,000.00
$1,426,000.00
$1,472,000.00
$1,518,000.00
$1,564,000.00
$1,610,000.00
$1,656,000.00
$1,702,000.00
$1,748,000.00
$1,794,000.00
$1,840,000.00
$1,886,000.00
$1,932,000.00
$1,978,000.00
$2,024,000.00
$2,070,000.00
$2,116,000.00
$2,162,000.00
$2,208,000.00
$2,254,000.00
$2,300,000.00
$2,300,000.00

I'll take these payments up until 2033. (You get the whole $46 million if you choose payments, right?)
 

compuwiz1

Admin Emeritus Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
27,112
930
126
At almost 50, I'd take the lump. The chances of guys my age being around for 20 years greatly diminishes, with each passing year.

That said, I would invest, then buy as much property that my income from the investment would let me mortgage, never touching the principle. I would take what I could reasonably enjoy, but not to excess. That's how estates are built. :)
 

xeemzor

Platinum Member
Mar 27, 2005
2,599
1
71
If you are younger, wouldn't you make more in the end by just investing the lump sum than taking payments?
 

Bill Brasky

Diamond Member
May 18, 2006
4,324
1
0
Originally posted by: theprodigalrebel
$1,196,000.00
$1,242,000.00
$1,288,000.00
$1,334,000.00
$1,380,000.00
$1,426,000.00
$1,472,000.00
$1,518,000.00
$1,564,000.00
$1,610,000.00
$1,656,000.00
$1,702,000.00
$1,748,000.00
$1,794,000.00
$1,840,000.00
$1,886,000.00
$1,932,000.00
$1,978,000.00
$2,024,000.00
$2,070,000.00
$2,116,000.00
$2,162,000.00
$2,208,000.00
$2,254,000.00
$2,300,000.00
$2,300,000.00

I'll take these payments up until 2033. (You get the whole $46 million if you choose payments, right?)

Anybody know what kind of taxes you'd be paying on these amounts?

For the McDonalds monopoly game it was better to take the lump sum because the payments didn't change and more money could be made off the interest of the lump sum.

edit: I would take the payments here though. 20 Million for not being able to wait is ridiculous.
 

aplefka

Lifer
Feb 29, 2004
12,014
2
0
I voted payments for this specific example because it's a large enough amount that inflation wouldn't kill it over the years, plus I hope that I'll be around for another 26 years.

If it was a smaller amount, I would have to reconsider.
 

xeemzor

Platinum Member
Mar 27, 2005
2,599
1
71
Originally posted by: Zaitsev
Originally posted by: theprodigalrebel
$1,196,000.00
$1,242,000.00
$1,288,000.00
$1,334,000.00
$1,380,000.00
$1,426,000.00
$1,472,000.00
$1,518,000.00
$1,564,000.00
$1,610,000.00
$1,656,000.00
$1,702,000.00
$1,748,000.00
$1,794,000.00
$1,840,000.00
$1,886,000.00
$1,932,000.00
$1,978,000.00
$2,024,000.00
$2,070,000.00
$2,116,000.00
$2,162,000.00
$2,208,000.00
$2,254,000.00
$2,300,000.00
$2,300,000.00

I'll take these payments up until 2033. (You get the whole $46 million if you choose payments, right?)

Anybody know what kind of taxes you'd be paying on these amounts?

For the McDonalds monopoly game it was better to take the lump sum because the payments didn't change and more money could be made off the interest of the lump sum.

edit: I would take the payments here though. 20 Million for not being able to wait is ridiculous.

Over 20 years the money will loose a decent chuck of it's value due to inflation and you also loose out on the opportunity to make gains via investing.
 

Falloutboy

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2003
5,916
0
76
lump sum and chuck it into a safe investment. even 5-10% yearly (which should be fairly doable) would be more than the payout over that length of time even if you spent the 5-10% every year
 

randay

Lifer
May 30, 2006
11,018
216
106
Originally posted by: xeemzor
If you are younger, wouldn't you make more in the end by just investing the lump sum than taking payments?

you would probably make much much more by investing the payments instead of the lump sum, you lose 20 mil right off the bat with the lump sum.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
Originally posted by: WhoBeDaPlaya
...I would quit grad school :p

that's funny, I'd *start* grad school :p

I'd take the payments... not only would it be less money in the end, I'd have an excuse to tell all the distant family members looking for money to shove off.

I'd probably splurge a bit (buy a vacation house, get a new car do something nice for my parents, sister, and the two cousins I actually like, etc) but invest a good chunk of the rest for my long-term needs (ie: retirement... I don't think I'd retire straight away, but I'd probably get into a low-paying field to do something that I actually enjoyed).
 

oiprocs

Diamond Member
Jun 20, 2001
3,780
2
0
Originally posted by: Zaitsev
I'll take these payments up until 2033. (You get the whole $46 million if you choose payments, right?)

Anybody know what kind of taxes you'd be paying on these amounts?

No, you don't get the whole $46 million. Normally, tax on an annuity will be less than that on a lump sum, because of the lower rates on lower income brackets. However, you're also gambling on today's tax rates being as high or higher than future tax rates ? any future change in tax rates could screw up your calculations. If you're already in the top bracket (and if you are, why are you buying lottery tickets? :p), then the tax treatment for the lottery would be the same, whether lump sum or annuity.
 

SandEagle

Lifer
Aug 4, 2007
16,809
13
0
Originally posted by: WhoBeDaPlaya
...I would quit grad school :p

i would go to grad school.....all that extra time i'll have on my hands. i'd have the uni name a building after me