If you refuse to sign a traffic ticket, what would happen?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
Down here in Louisiana, the cop will put you in jail if you refuse to sign a ticket. By sign the ticket, you just state that you receive the ticket and promise to appear later for court.

BTW, I agree with the poster about Traffic Court. It is a place that you assumed guilty and it is up to you to prove otherwise. One time I asked the cop to see his laser/radar gun because he said I was speeding and I know darn well that I wasn't. He told me that he would not let me and if I kept asking to see it, I would go to jail. Talk about a***hole cop.
 

Originally posted by: Svnla
Down here in Louisiana, the cop will put you in jail if you refuse to sign a ticket. By sign the ticket, you just state that you receive the ticket and promise to appear later for court.

BTW, I agree with the poster about Traffic Court. It is a place that you assumed guilty and it is up to you to prove otherwise. One time I asked the cop to see his laser/radar gun because he said I was speeding and I know darn well that I wasn't. He told me that he would not let me and if I kept asking to see it, I would go to jail. Talk about a***hole cop.

he wasnt being as asshole, as you have NO RIGHT to see his radar or laser. It endangers him, and to keep on asking him against his wishes could probably be considered harassment.
 

johnjosh

Banned
Dec 13, 2003
290
0
0
Originally posted by: Svnla
Down here in Louisiana, the cop will put you in jail if you refuse to sign a ticket. By sign the ticket, you just state that you receive the ticket and promise to appear later for court.

BTW, I agree with the poster about Traffic Court. It is a place that you assumed guilty and it is up to you to prove otherwise. One time I asked the cop to see his laser/radar gun because he said I was speeding and I know darn well that I wasn't. He told me that he would not let me and if I kept asking to see it, I would go to jail. Talk about a***hole cop.

you should have told him to call his field supervisor(aka watch commander)
 

Whisper

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2000
5,394
2
81
Originally posted by: FallenHero
Originally posted by: Svnla
Down here in Louisiana, the cop will put you in jail if you refuse to sign a ticket. By sign the ticket, you just state that you receive the ticket and promise to appear later for court.

BTW, I agree with the poster about Traffic Court. It is a place that you assumed guilty and it is up to you to prove otherwise. One time I asked the cop to see his laser/radar gun because he said I was speeding and I know darn well that I wasn't. He told me that he would not let me and if I kept asking to see it, I would go to jail. Talk about a***hole cop.

he wasnt being as asshole, as you have NO RIGHT to see his radar or laser. It endangers him, and to keep on asking him against his wishes could probably be considered harassment.

I thought you did have a right to at least see the officer calibrate his radar/laser, or something like that. I remember being told that a few times (or something like it) after receiving a speeding ticket here in GA. Maybe I misheard him, though.
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: johnjosh
Originally posted by: Svnla
Down here in Louisiana, the cop will put you in jail if you refuse to sign a ticket. By sign the ticket, you just state that you receive the ticket and promise to appear later for court.

BTW, I agree with the poster about Traffic Court. It is a place that you assumed guilty and it is up to you to prove otherwise. One time I asked the cop to see his laser/radar gun because he said I was speeding and I know darn well that I wasn't. He told me that he would not let me and if I kept asking to see it, I would go to jail. Talk about a***hole cop.

you should have told him to call his field supervisor(aka watch commander)

And they certainly don't have to do that either.
 

johnjosh

Banned
Dec 13, 2003
290
0
0
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: johnjosh
Originally posted by: Svnla
Down here in Louisiana, the cop will put you in jail if you refuse to sign a ticket. By sign the ticket, you just state that you receive the ticket and promise to appear later for court.

BTW, I agree with the poster about Traffic Court. It is a place that you assumed guilty and it is up to you to prove otherwise. One time I asked the cop to see his laser/radar gun because he said I was speeding and I know darn well that I wasn't. He told me that he would not let me and if I kept asking to see it, I would go to jail. Talk about a***hole cop.

you should have told him to call his field supervisor(aka watch commander)

And they certainly don't have to do that either.

you saying they can refuse to call there supervisor?
 

AvesPKS

Diamond Member
Apr 21, 2000
4,729
0
0
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: alkemyst
In some areas you also give up your license by refusing to sign. You will also be arrested without a doubt. I believe may licenses have that verbiage on them.

Å

Care to link an example, because I've only heard of that in case of refusing a DUI/sobriety test. A less serious moving violation(minus DUI) should not have a requirement to surrender your license at all. Because DUI can be hard to prove, states made that a law to prevent everyone from refusing the tests.

Never heard of a single state that would require you to surrender your license if you didn't signature bond yourself. You would be arrested but then you can make monetary bond. Because most states require a judge to actually suspend/revoke a license, and the police are there to enforce the law and not interpret/rule on it. DUI is different because the there is an actual law that exists that says you will have your license suspended/revoked if you refuse a sobriety test.

If you're ever driving under the influence in DC, take the breathalyzer. A buddy of mine's a DC cop, and he said that they're not admissible as evidence (in DC).
 

Svnla

Lifer
Nov 10, 2003
17,986
1,388
126
Originally posted by: FallenHero
Originally posted by: Svnla
Down here in Louisiana, the cop will put you in jail if you refuse to sign a ticket. By sign the ticket, you just state that you receive the ticket and promise to appear later for court.

BTW, I agree with the poster about Traffic Court. It is a place that you assumed guilty and it is up to you to prove otherwise. One time I asked the cop to see his laser/radar gun because he said I was speeding and I know darn well that I wasn't. He told me that he would not let me and if I kept asking to see it, I would go to jail. Talk about a***hole cop.

he wasnt being as asshole, as you have NO RIGHT to see his radar or laser. It endangers him, and to keep on asking him against his wishes could probably be considered harassment.


Endangers him? How so? We both parked on a business parking lot, way off traffic. I was asking him nicely, didn't raise my voice or give him attitude. What I am trying to say is what happend to ***Innocent until proven guilty***??? Only in Traffic Court that **** Guilty until proven otherwise***. Of course the traffic judge will take a cop words.

PS. Don't give me start on the ***we only do this (hiding with laser/radar guns) because of public safety***. LOL.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: Mill
Never heard of a single state that would require you to surrender your license if you didn't signature bond yourself. You would be arrested but then you can make monetary bond. Because most states require a judge to actually suspend/revoke a license, and the police are there to enforce the law and not interpret/rule on it. DUI is different because the there is an actual law that exists that says you will have your license suspended/revoked if you refuse a sobriety test.

Like I said back it up. There are 50 states, so find a few and post it.

You know why Mill? because you are merely trying to contest me without any real knowledge of your own....someone intelligent would have at least done their own search first before throwing crap, State level is not the only place to look for these things, traffic fines/laws can be on a way lower level. However here is a link in Cinninnati that a police force was doing just this although it was against the rules: Cinninnati Enquirer, here is it in Illinois, they have a set bond of $105 for 30mph over or your license/bail bond cert: IL Law. Also some areas have ridiculously high bonds (close to $1000). Like I said though, in certain towns they will take your license for the bond....they could give a crap less that you are on vacation....sure you can 'contest' this and perhaps win....but what goes on in real life is a lot different than what you are saying....even if it is by whatever book you are reading.

Many or some? I'd say most keep a jail time requirement for speeding between 10-30 days. Florida counts a speeding ticket as a non-criminal infractions, but if you refuse to sign you will be charged with a criminal misdemeanor. Most states don't even treat tickets as a criminal infraction and most won't give jail time unless it meets the standards of reckless driving which is usually another statute to begin with.

In most states the max penality for speeding is 3 months in jail. Like all max penalities it is rarely given. A speeding ticket for 'unlawful speed' there is no jail time in Florida, however, if the officier deems your speed not only unlawful but totally excessive then you fall under 'reckless driving' (which you mentioned but reckless driving can be based on speeding) the Statute in Florida is 316.192(3), any person convicted of reckless driving shall be punished: (a) Upon a first conviction, by imprisonment for a period of not more than 90 days or by fine of not less than $25 nor more than $500, or by both such fine and imprisonment. (b) On a second or subsequent conviction, by imprisonment for not more than 6 months or by a fine of not less than $50 nor more than $1,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

The bad part on that is there is really no 'limit' that you get before you may be considered for 'reckless driving' I think you are just trying to argue with me though....regardless you get stopped for speeding your can get a reckless driving ticket. Chances are you meet the right officer and refuse to cooperate that's what he will hand you.

Seriously, how did me asking you to back up what you said involve into a case study of what you think you know about the law? In your own state speeding is a non-criminal act and in some it is a criminal act. It does have to follow due process and other constitutional clauses, because it IS the government. You may mean they are less stringent, and that they are quite as serious, but that doesn't mean the constitution doesn't apply. You don't have to be given your Miranda rights ever unless they are interviewing them. Mirandizing someone has little to do with "what" their crime/infraction is. It has to do with making sure they realize their rights before they start to talk and incriminate themselves. You can't go back in regular court either and say you missed a step if you are representing yourself, but a judge would probably force a lawyer to advise you and push you into asking for discovery. In case of a traffic infraction most judges will get ticked if you ask for discovery, but you have every right to.

Not many have that lawyer in 'traffic' court....that was my point. Many falsely think the most traffic court can result in is a slap on the wrist and a fine. Not so...but again your method is not so much to show what's right, it's merely to split hairs and attempt to discredit me.

Surrendering your license for bond is usually done if someone doesn't want to give their written word as bond. I never said you couldn't use your license for bond. I said you didn't have to give up your license if you refuse to sign. Stop twisting things.

No in some areas, you have to post bond by the books....your signature does nothing. You are the one twisting things and as above I have provided REAL WORLD proof this does happen.

Nope. Citations will never have a signature as proof of guilt. A signature is just you saying you will appear in court and is your "bond." Writing under protest is just going to make the police officer remember more about your case and likely to be better prepared. If you want to contest a ticket then you do NOT want to write under protest next to it. It also sounds like you had the ticket snatched from you, or your license chunked down because you were acting like a prick to the cop.

Please go check this link out: Penalty Assessment: I acknowledge my guilt of the offense charged and my options as explained to me by the officer. I agree to remit by mail the penalty assessment shown above. , again that is just the first one I stumbled across searching quickly.

What you have "heard" and what is reality is different my friend. If you want to post some information to the contrary then feel free to do so.
ironic isn't it.

Å
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: AvesPKS

If you're ever driving under the influence in DC, take the breathalyzer. A buddy of mine's a DC cop, and he said that they're not admissible as evidence (in DC).

This is only true of the roadside breathalyzer (which is usually not called a breathalyzer in the courtroom).

If you are taken in and told to blow into the full sized unit that is definitely admissable, you blow high enough and only luck can save you even if you have 10 witnesses saying you never drank a drop. Pretty much anything roadside you are better not to do and the field side tests only help to hurt your case. Very few can do the FST's properly even sober and usually get defensive during them. What you get is a tape showing a stumbling "but I wasn't drinking officer" person....Your best response is to say (if true) you were not drinking or you are not intoxicated and you do not have a problem submitting to a proper breathalyzer test given under supervision (you will be arrested for this request as you will have to ride with the officer, getting arrested is not anything 'bad' on your record...however they do not have to take you back to your car if you pass ;))

If you know you are guilty it's tricky what to do or say, your best bet would have been not to drive at this point :)

Å
 

MacBaine

Banned
Aug 23, 2001
9,999
0
0
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: AvesPKS

If you're ever driving under the influence in DC, take the breathalyzer. A buddy of mine's a DC cop, and he said that they're not admissible as evidence (in DC).

This is only true of the roadside breathalyzer (which is usually not called a breathalyzer in the courtroom).

If you are taken in and told to blow into the full sized unit that is definitely admissable, you blow high enough and only luck can save you even if you have 10 witnesses saying you never drank a drop. Pretty much anything roadside you are better not to do and the field side tests only help to hurt your case. Very few can do the FST's properly even sober and usually get defensive during them. What you get is a tape showing a stumbling "but I wasn't drinking officer" person....Your best response is to say (if true) you were not drinking or you are not intoxicated and you do not have a problem submitting to a proper breathalyzer test given under supervision (you will be arrested for this request as you will have to ride with the officer, getting arrested is not anything 'bad' on your record...however they do not have to take you back to your car if you pass ;))

If you know you are guilty it's tricky what to do or say, your best bet would have been not to drive at this point :)

Å

A PBT failure is admissable as evidendce, the exact BAC which it displayed is not.
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: Mill
Never heard of a single state that would require you to surrender your license if you didn't signature bond yourself. You would be arrested but then you can make monetary bond. Because most states require a judge to actually suspend/revoke a license, and the police are there to enforce the law and not interpret/rule on it. DUI is different because the there is an actual law that exists that says you will have your license suspended/revoked if you refuse a sobriety test.

Like I said back it up. There are 50 states, so find a few and post it.

You know why Mill? because you are merely trying to contest me without any real knowledge of your own....someone intelligent would have at least done their own search first before throwing crap, State level is not the only place to look for these things, traffic fines/laws can be on a way lower level. However here is a link in Cinninnati that a police force was doing just this although it was against the rules: Cinninnati Enquirer, here is it in Illinois, they have a set bond of $105 for 30mph over or your license/bail bond cert: IL Law. Also some areas have ridiculously high bonds (close to $1000). Like I said though, in certain towns they will take your license for the bond....they could give a crap less that you are on vacation....sure you can 'contest' this and perhaps win....but what goes on in real life is a lot different than what you are saying....even if it is by whatever book you are reading.

Many or some? I'd say most keep a jail time requirement for speeding between 10-30 days. Florida counts a speeding ticket as a non-criminal infractions, but if you refuse to sign you will be charged with a criminal misdemeanor. Most states don't even treat tickets as a criminal infraction and most won't give jail time unless it meets the standards of reckless driving which is usually another statute to begin with.

In most states the max penality for speeding is 3 months in jail. Like all max penalities it is rarely given. A speeding ticket for 'unlawful speed' there is no jail time in Florida, however, if the officier deems your speed not only unlawful but totally excessive then you fall under 'reckless driving' (which you mentioned but reckless driving can be based on speeding) the Statute in Florida is 316.192(3), any person convicted of reckless driving shall be punished: (a) Upon a first conviction, by imprisonment for a period of not more than 90 days or by fine of not less than $25 nor more than $500, or by both such fine and imprisonment. (b) On a second or subsequent conviction, by imprisonment for not more than 6 months or by a fine of not less than $50 nor more than $1,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment.

The bad part on that is there is really no 'limit' that you get before you may be considered for 'reckless driving' I think you are just trying to argue with me though....regardless you get stopped for speeding your can get a reckless driving ticket. Chances are you meet the right officer and refuse to cooperate that's what he will hand you.

Seriously, how did me asking you to back up what you said involve into a case study of what you think you know about the law? In your own state speeding is a non-criminal act and in some it is a criminal act. It does have to follow due process and other constitutional clauses, because it IS the government. You may mean they are less stringent, and that they are quite as serious, but that doesn't mean the constitution doesn't apply. You don't have to be given your Miranda rights ever unless they are interviewing them. Mirandizing someone has little to do with "what" their crime/infraction is. It has to do with making sure they realize their rights before they start to talk and incriminate themselves. You can't go back in regular court either and say you missed a step if you are representing yourself, but a judge would probably force a lawyer to advise you and push you into asking for discovery. In case of a traffic infraction most judges will get ticked if you ask for discovery, but you have every right to.

Not many have that lawyer in 'traffic' court....that was my point. Many falsely think the most traffic court can result in is a slap on the wrist and a fine. Not so...but again your method is not so much to show what's right, it's merely to split hairs and attempt to discredit me.

Surrendering your license for bond is usually done if someone doesn't want to give their written word as bond. I never said you couldn't use your license for bond. I said you didn't have to give up your license if you refuse to sign. Stop twisting things.

No in some areas, you have to post bond by the books....your signature does nothing. You are the one twisting things and as above I have provided REAL WORLD proof this does happen.

Nope. Citations will never have a signature as proof of guilt. A signature is just you saying you will appear in court and is your "bond." Writing under protest is just going to make the police officer remember more about your case and likely to be better prepared. If you want to contest a ticket then you do NOT want to write under protest next to it. It also sounds like you had the ticket snatched from you, or your license chunked down because you were acting like a prick to the cop.

Please go check this link out: Penalty Assessment: I acknowledge my guilt of the offense charged and my options as explained to me by the officer. I agree to remit by mail the penalty assessment shown above. , again that is just the first one I stumbled across searching quickly.

What you have "heard" and what is reality is different my friend. If you want to post some information to the contrary then feel free to do so.
ironic isn't it.

Å

You're really a huge fvcking moron aren't you? You didn't say you could give your license up as bond. You said: In some areas you also give up your license by refusing to sign. That doesn't mean you are posting bond. That meant you were confusing the DUI law with law regarding a bond.

On to your next point. You said: Many states have a three month jail term as a possible penalty for speeding Not: Reckless driving.

And no Florida doesn't have MPH over limit, but reckless driving tickets are given out about a 1/10 as much as a speeding ticket. Your analogy/logic or pure stupidity was once again wrong.

Last and final point: Copy of a NM UTC. See that little Red Box? See the Black box underneath?

You have to CHECK the first box listed in red AND have the officer explain to you the difference. Otherwise:

As will be discussed in greater detail in Section 4.4.2, Acceptance of Guilty Plea, a judge may not accept a guilty plea unless it is demonstrated in open court that the plea is being made knowingly and voluntarily. To ascertain this, the judge must ensure that the defendant understands the rights being given up by pleading guilty. Additionally, a judge must elicit a factual basis for the plea; in other words, the judge must be persuaded that the defendant is able to explain what the basis of the charge is. In a nutshell, a plea is knowing and voluntary if the judge is satisfied that the defendant knowingly waives the right against self- incrimination, the right to a trial, the right to confront accusers and question witnesses and the right to counsel (although this will not be applicable in a penalty assessment case since there is no jail time involved), and that there has been no coercion to plead guilty. Because it is certain that the law enforcement officer would not have explained all of this to the traffic offender at the time of the stop, it is certainly arguable that the plea on the penalty assessment was not determined to be knowing and voluntary, and if the offender alleges confusion of some kind, the offender should be allowed to change his/her plea and proceed to trial.


So like I said... signing a citation does not mean you admit guilt. You'd have to check the huge I ACKNOWLEDGE MY GUILT Block for you to admit guilt, but as referenced earlier, judges don't really care for that type of UTC.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
You're really a huge fvcking moron aren't you? You didn't say you could give your license up as bond. You said: In some areas you also give up your license by refusing to sign. That doesn't mean you are posting bond. That meant you were confusing the DUI law with law regarding a bond.

Let me do this step by step, not that it will matter as you will blindly cry 'no no no moron moron' like a flailing toddler in a tantrum:

By refusing to sign you could be arrested, by being arrested you will be taken into custody, to get out of custody you'd need to post a 'bond'. In some places this will be insisted to be your license. Regardless of what is on the law books...this happens in REAL LIFE End of story....True in some, possibly many areas this would not happen, and also in many cases if not close to ALL the stopped motorist will sign the ticket and not protest that....however that is not the same as ALWAYS. You clearly can't be this dense...your act is not proving anything, but who is really the adult here.

On to your next point. You said: Many states have a three month jail term as a possible penalty for speeding Not: Reckless driving.

And no Florida doesn't have MPH over limit, but reckless driving tickets are given out about a 1/10 as much as a speeding ticket. Your analogy/logic or pure stupidity was once again wrong.

Now where was I wrong? so 1/10 of the time (I should be like you now and cry for quantitive proof that it's exactly 1/10 of the time, right? ;) ) you may get a reckless driving ticket where your only crime (which is never criminal according to you) was speeding, but reckless driving is considered criminal right and you can get up to 6 months in jail for a second offense on this? so my logic that you can get jail time for speeding is wrong except for a fraction of the 1/10 of the time I am right? No wonder you are confused, I'd be too. I don't think you understand there is a lot of gray areas between the two extremes.

The bottom line is for doing nothing but speeding (and this can be even as low at 5MPH over the limit) you can get jail time even in Florida which considers speeding (actually a ticket of 'unlawful speed' which is different than speeding by itself) should the officer cite you for reckless driving (which is his perogative) and the judge deem you guilty and sentences you to a term of no less than the maximum time allowed. So how am I wrong to say that speeding can get you into jail? Doesn't matter if it's a rare circumstance, it can happen and that was my point. Your point is only to attempt to discredit me and that's fine, however, no one has won any debate simply attacking the debater.....the issue at hand is what could happen by refusing to sign a traffic ticket. Not what happens in Mill's little world only.

Last and final point: Copy of a NM UTC. See that little Red Box? See the Black box underneath?

You have to CHECK the first box listed in red AND have the officer explain to you the difference.

So like I said... signing a citation does not mean you admit guilt. You'd have to check the huge I ACKNOWLEDGE MY GUILT Block for you to admit guilt, but as referenced earlier, judges don't really care for that type of UTC.

The argument was that signing is ALWAYS only an order to appear in court/admit you are merely receiving a citation......that is FALSE you could also be signing that you ADMIT GUILT, and that was my point. There are also tickets without that checkbox with the same verbiage I am not going to spend my morning hunting down lawbooks and diagrams....but you'd have something to say to that effect too even if I did, and then quote a million previous lines to do it.

A judge is not going to save your tail should you be arrested until after the fact. That check box I will guarantee will be checked ahead of time by the OFFICER, it's not as if you can choose one....it's simply stating what you are signing which if that top box was checked by the OFFICER when you sign, you are admitting guilt. Regardless, what happens if you still refuse to sign it?

I am done here as this will just go on and on and you have only provided alternatives that I would be wrong on...which I never said didn't exist. I am stating things are not ALWAYS what you are saying which still makes me correct.

Å
 

slick230

Banned
Jan 31, 2003
2,776
0
0
Originally posted by: Mill
My God.... you're a total fvcking tool.

Why don't you two just get married or something. It seems like you both go out of your way looking for posts from the other one in order to start arguments. Just shut the fvck up already.
 

jimmygates

Platinum Member
Sep 4, 2000
2,134
2
81
In California we verbally tell the violator that signing the ticket does not admit guilt, just a promise to appear. If you fail to sign the ticket, a supervisor ( field seargent ) is notified. The supervisor will also ask the violator to sign the ticket. If violator refuses, supervisor gives the approval for arrest.




-Jimbo
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: slick230
Originally posted by: Mill
My God.... you're a total fvcking tool.

Why don't you two just get married or something. It seems like you both go out of your way looking for posts from the other one in order to start arguments. Just shut the fvck up already.

I don't look for any of his threads...sorry. There is no sense debating anything with someone without reason nor someone that uses special cases to prove ALWAYS and NEVER.

He is just p!ssed that I realize if he put on some wrestling headgear he'd look just like Warren from There's Somethere about Mary...:)

FrAnK N BeAnS! FrAnK N BeAnS!

Å