AndyHui,
I'm slowly building a SCSI box that just might become a poor man's Web Server. While the CUSL-2 and CUSL-2C allow you to OC the FSB to the moon and back, I've been overclocking ever since the C300A @450 popularized the "sport." Frankly, I'm sick and tired of doing it. Watching my temps like a worried maiden aunt is tiresome. Now that AMD's competition has driven Intel's CPU prices down, the price spread is no longer a zillion bucks between a P3E 700 and a P3EB 933. Overclocking is no longer necessary. It is a means to an end for me, not a fetish. I just want to run a P3EB 800 at "stock." Period.
The 440BX chipset is overclocked at 133 Mhz FSB. Nonetheless, my P3B-F accomplishes this with aplomb. At this point, the P3B-F is looking like the best mainboard for my SCSI box. Most folks are happy with their CUBX's and CUBX-E's---yet I just don't think it's a rock solid board. The hassle is that P3B-F's aren't listed on Pricewatch any more. The CUBX-E incorporates a Promise ATA-100 controller. This would let me run ATA-100 HDD's AND U2W SCSI HDD's. The Promise ATA-100 Controller on a PCI card is detected as a SCSI controller in my P3B-F's Bios. Adding a PCI SCSI host adapter to my P3B-F doesn't seem possible, AFAIK.
The long-winded Klosters strikes again. Here's my beef with i815e/ep's: their Sandra 2K/2001 Memory Benchmarks are flat out embarassing. That Chipzilla took a step backwards from the 440BX's performance when they made the i815e's isses me offpay. Why reward a company for making a new product worse than the older one? 160 Mhz FSB capability means nothing to me. As I wrote, I'm SICK of OCing.