If you had the chance to push a button...

[iamtrout]

Would you push the button?

 

[MikeMike]

hey, i want your collection of CFF dude.

 

[iamtrout]

Haha WTF?

Uhh... how?

 

[MikeMike]

thread hijack complete

im thinking a slowwwwwww transfer somehow. very slow, slow enough to make it less than 3gb/day

 

[funkymatt]

how is this 90/10 ratio? are there 10 buttons? i dont understand!

 

[Wallydraigle]

When everyone else is dead, then there will be world peace.

 

[Xionide]

I don't care what it is in that 10%. 90% chance of death would be the deal breaker.

 

[Kalbi]

world peace would mean no freedom

 

[hevnsnt]

I voted NO

 

[sniperruff]

replace "world peace" with "a night with jalba" and im sure many would go for it.

 

[ajpa123]

If you got lucky.. what in the world would beauty pageant contestants ever wish for ?

 

[iamtrout]

Originally posted by: nourdmrolNMT1
thread hijack complete

im thinking a slowwwwwww transfer somehow. very slow, slow enough to make it less than 3gb/day

My upload's like 20K/s.

 

[Mojoed]

Hell yes I would take that chance, and I'm not the least bit suicidal. World peace means much more than one life ever will.

 

[DaveSimmons]

:surprise; I wasn't expecting to be the first "Yes," but I should have realized "Get someone else to do it" would appeal to all of the smarta$$es here

Edit: nice to see someone else stepping up to the (electrified?) plate.

 

[dolph]

hey, i want a collection of cff!

 

[walla]

Originally posted by: ajpa123
If you got lucky.. what in the world would beauty pageant contestants ever wish for ?

In a world of peace, there are no contests. Everyone would be equally as beautiful in everyone elses eyes, anyway.

 

[PingSpike]

What good is world peace if I'm to dead to enjoy it?

 

[Ronstang]

I wouldn't push the button because world peace is a farce. It is simply unatainable when one considers human nature. The only way there could ever be peace would be if certain populations were completely eradicated. Which populations would depend upon your perstpective. Genghis Kahn had the right idea of completely destroying and killing his enemy but there are too many socially liberal people in the world for that to ever be an option in modern times so a certain level of world chaos is assured into perpetuity.

 

[Ronstang]

I wouldn't push the button because world peace is a farce. It is simply unatainable when one considers human nature. The only way there could ever be peace would be if certain populations were completely eradicated. Which populations would depend upon your perstpective. Genghis Kahn had the right idea of completely destroying and killing his enemy but there are too many socially liberal people in the world for that to ever be an option in modern times so a certain level of world chaos is assured into perpetuity.

 

[BW86]

I would make someone else push it

 

[Wallydraigle]

Just because there's peace, doesn't mean there's plenty or prosperity, or happiness. When the grass has dried up and blown away, and bleached bones litter the landscape, and you just served your weaker children who didn't make it, to the stronger ones who might last a little longer, without telling them what it was, and that little Johny went to live on the farm, because in desperate times you have to make desperate choices, and the sentence goes on and on and on, then everyone will be too tired and hungry to fight. Then there will be peace.

 

No, thoes are not bettable odds.

 

[TheNinja]

No - I would be out of a profession.

 

[FoBoT]

no way, are you crazy?

if it was

10% chance i would live and 90% to launch nuclear weapons at all of our enemies, then yes, i would push it

 

[HonkeyDonk]

Originally posted by: PingSpike
What good is world peace if I'm to dead to enjoy it?

Umm...if you are the lucky 10% to get world peace, you'd still be alive....

It's if you dont get world peace, you will die AND there still won't be world peace.