Sheik Yerbouti
Lifer
- Feb 16, 2005
- 14,080
- 5,452
- 136
If the winds are right we should launch small balloons with bags or rice and vegetable seeds, protein powder, medicine, and so on, that will fall all over the country. Folk will find and start to look for them. Some will have more to eat and be able to treat simple ailments.
Sadly if I remember correctly, individuals in North Korea found possessing items from outside countries like you mention would be imprisoned or worse.
And probably add its own poisoned packets to make sure they get the point.And I'm sure that the NK government would also make sure to alert the citizens to the "poison" dropped by the Americans and that eating any of it will result in a very unpleasant death.
Sadly if I remember correctly, individuals in North Korea found possessing items from outside countries like you mention would be imprisoned or worse.
Next time N. Korea fire artillery shells into S. Korea, the U.S should let S. Korea retaliate.
The US should let?
Sadly if I remember correctly, individuals in North Korea found possessing items from outside countries like you mention would be imprisoned or worse.
Including some AKs and loaded magazines might help that situation...
No, it doesn't. Beyond the fact that China is absolutely insurmountable as a reasonable task, its human rights record in recent years is on a completely different playing field than NK's. Absolutely, massively, completely different. Dito for Iran, Saudia Arabia, and country you can think of that sucks in some significant way for human rights NK outdoes them all handily. Also, China at the least is making continual and meaningful strides to eb a less crappy country to live in. Why upset the apple cart?What is north korea doing that dozens of other nations are not?
If you support striking NK, what about china? China has a much worse human rights record than NK. China is increasing its military budget.
What about Iran? Last week Russia announced it might build a nuclear reactor in Iran in exchange for oil.
Even Saudi Arabia has a terrible human rights record.
NK represents NO threat to the US worth mentioning. It is indeed a pissant sabre rattler as far as the US is concerned, but it is destroying the lives of millions of people. They may not be US citizens, but they are human beings, all part of the same species.the longer this goes on, the funnier it gets. NK keeps saber rattling while their saber is really a butter knife.
I know the UN can't tell its members what to do nor does it have a standing army. The security council should be taking care of this. The UN was setup to ensure this kind of nonsense doesn't happen and we all as a human race have let it go on.Unfortunately, many in the US failed to dissociate from the misinformation against the United Nations. It is not some independent world entity with its own power to enforce.
I wonder what would happen if a large bombing campaign just took out their leadership and as much of their war machine as possible, then let everybody there pick up the pieces. Who knows...I would only support the use of US air and naval forces, not the use of American troops. Let other countries risk their soldiers for a change. And keep in mind, I've said before that I believe the US would take NK out in a matter of days or weeks, not months, and yet I still don't want to risk our men or pay for an occupation.
Some in SK are already doing thisIf the winds are right we should launch small balloons with bags or rice and vegetable seeds, protein powder, medicine, and so on, that will fall all over the country. Folk will find and start to look for them. Some will have more to eat and be able to treat simple ailments.
^^^THIS!^^^Spreading freedom and democracy does not work. The people have to want it enough to claim it for themselves.
What would happen if NK was invaded? Would the populace welcome the invaders bringing them freedom? Or would they think the invaders were the enemy, bringing destruction and spreading lies about Dear Leader? And what would they do with democracy? Install another dictator?
Including some AKs and loaded magazines might help that situation...
Maybe. Certainly that would be a lot better for the South Koreans, but we'd still kill an awful lot of North Koreans to save them. War is and always will be an ugly, nasty business, and not to be taken lightly even with an overwhelming technological advantage.
I don't think we'll ever see that day in general, for defensive weapons always lend offensive advantage and thus must be countered. If one's likely opponent has the defensive ability to stop everything you can throw at him, that means he has a safe first strike capacity, so you must find a counter or be at his mercy. However, G-d willing we'll be at that point with regards to North Korea within a couple decades. Assuming we can afford to keep financing our military anyway.I know it's not a clear choice. Yet it remains something I could approve of given the right circumstances. When weighing the untold death and suffering the dictator will unleash upon future generations. It's a measurement of how much pain they suffer in an instant VS prolonged, if not eternally. Who knows what century will see the end of NK.
Right now our, my, chief concern is protecting South Korea and others from retaliation. I can see a day where we are capable of guaranteeing that protection. Where we will rule the sky and prevent all ordnance or missiles which make attempt upon the innocent.
Not saying we'll use that power wisely.
Apparently China won't even sign off on this matter going to the security council.
Yep. Nothing will be resolved without China on this matter.Hence the identity of the biggest problem. China. Chinese protection is the only reason why the North Korean regime has not yet been taken out. For some reason China has a use for North Korea and its current regime.
