• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

If you died today, would you be let into Heaven?

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Gawd, this is a disgusting read. You'd think FelixDeKat would have earned a ban long before now for some of the crap that's been spewed...
 
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
That might be funny if it weren't blasphemy.

Firstly, blasphemy is funny.

Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
try to use facts to back up your statement, rather than hypothesis which cannot be proven at the present time.

Got Hypocrisy?

- M4H

M4H, just what are you blathering about now? Because I confused Schrodinger and Heisenberg I'm a hypocrite?

Maybe you should learn to read text other than that which is contained in a book starting with "B" and ending in "ible". Read what you said about using facts to back up a statement instead of unproven and currently unprovable hypothesis. Now, make that massive leap in competency to the fact that I just posted that quote of yours in a thread where you're going off on yet another one of your damned religious zealotfests.

Get it yet?

Originally posted by: alkemyst
I think it has perhaps something to do with Aki Kawamura in your sig.

No, I have nothing wrong with Flyermax's link to a hardcore porn site in his sig - he can go right ahead.

- M4H
 
wasn't the uncertainty principle the heisenberg uncertainty principle? (relationship of ability to know velocity and location based on quantum theory)

the main thing schrodenger was know for, in terms of uncertainty, was the schrodinger's cat paradox... simply stating that in a system based upon probablities, until you stop that system the "state of the system" in indeterminate

in terms of the philosophy of science, there is lots of arguing, there are no absolutes... only hypotheses, theories, and laws

yes we have data, but what does it show/prove?!

we're trying to understand the nature of the universe, by examining bits and peices, and piece together the puzzle with the data we record...

nothing is completely absolute, a law (the most certain thing we have), is simply something that, without known exception, behaves as we expect and can predict

example:
experiment trying to prove G-d
1. Go to Egypt
2. hit a rock with a stick
-does water come out?
repeat step 2 (many, many times)

does this prove (or disprove) G-d? no, we don't have anything exactly right (we're not in ~1000BC, we're not moses, etc)
but it helps to prove that, as we can explain the universe, water cannot come from a rock upon being hit w/ a stick

as for me, i'm goin' to hell (7th circle, round 3, stretched out on burning sand)

(me = chemistry major, working in a lab right now)
 
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
That might be funny if it weren't blasphemy.

Firstly, blasphemy is funny.

Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
try to use facts to back up your statement, rather than hypothesis which cannot be proven at the present time.

Got Hypocrisy?

- M4H

M4H, just what are you blathering about now? Because I confused Schrodinger and Heisenberg I'm a hypocrite?

Maybe you should learn to read text other than that which is contained in a book starting with "B" and ending in "ible". Read what you said about using facts to back up a statement instead of unproven and currently unprovable hypothesis. Now, make that massive leap in competency to the fact that I just posted that quote of yours in a thread where you're going off on yet another one of your damned religious zealotfests.

Get it yet?

Originally posted by: alkemyst
I think it has perhaps something to do with Aki Kawamura in your sig.

No, I have nothing wrong with Flyermax's link to a hardcore porn site in his sig - he can go right ahead.

- M4H

blah blah blah M4H hates Christians blah blah blah Christians are idiots blah blah blah

BTW, I had *no* idea there was any porn at the site in my sig link, sorry about that 🙁 It's been removed though.
 
If you are speaking of the Heaven of the Bible then here would be the only ticket:

John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. "

By the way, yep!
 
Considering what God would prefer you NOT to do while here, I have to imagine there are at least the same restrictions up there. I think I will opt for reincarnation......
 
Get used to it...yer food fer the worms and that's it..the mystery of life is...there is no mystery..
 
Originally posted by: oniq
If there was a "God" he'd let everyone into heaven. We are all his children!1one

No, that would make G-d a hypocrite. You pagans don't seem to understand that for this universe to even exist G-d's word has to be true. If G-d were to go back on His word, that would make Him a hypocrite, and this universe would cease to exist.
 
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: oniq
If there was a "God" he'd let everyone into heaven. We are all his children!1one

No, that would make G-d a hypocrite. You pagans don't seem to understand that for this universe to even exist G-d's word has to be true. If G-d were to go back on His word, that would make Him a hypocrite, and this universe would cease to exist.

Who the fvck is G hyphen d?
 
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: oniq
If there was a "God" he'd let everyone into heaven. We are all his children!1one

No, that would make G-d a hypocrite. You pagans don't seem to understand that for this universe to even exist G-d's word has to be true. If G-d were to go back on His word, that would make Him a hypocrite, and this universe would cease to exist.

Yah, infallaibility but you only "believe" he is infalliable.
 
If I died today I would not be let into heaven. I would have to wait until Judgment Day. Then I will go, although I don't deserve too.
 
Originally posted by: oniq
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: oniq
If there was a "God" he'd let everyone into heaven. We are all his children!1one

No, that would make G-d a hypocrite. You pagans don't seem to understand that for this universe to even exist G-d's word has to be true. If G-d were to go back on His word, that would make Him a hypocrite, and this universe would cease to exist.

Who the fvck is G hyphen d?

G-D
 
Originally posted by: Flyermax2k3
Originally posted by: oniq
If there was a "God" he'd let everyone into heaven. We are all his children!1one

No, that would make G-d a hypocrite. You pagans don't seem to understand that for this universe to even exist G-d's word has to be true. If G-d were to go back on His word, that would make Him a hypocrite, and this universe would cease to exist.

I don't know who G-d is. But what the hell are you talking about? For the universe to exist, "G-d's" word has to be true? That's pretty circular. That's like if I say that I am God, and for the universe to exist, I must be God.
 
Religion in all of it's forms is a fear based way for humans to try and understand what is actually going on here on planet earth. It's the non active form of science, I suppose. Xtianity and it's stupid big black book are probably the biggest reasons why humanity has failed to gain any sort of momentum towards further evolution. Religion is for sheep who do and act like others in order to feel that they belong or believe in something. It's been the cause of a spiralling down of humanity for the longest time.

If you understood or have done any research whatsoever on subatomic particles you will come to an understanding that the life force that is "God" is in everything. And that you don't need to believe in anything other than that to be "saved". And with this connection to your own subatomic particles and the subatomic particles of everything else you can create what you want in your lives.

One of the coolest damn things I've seen recently was the movie Bruce Almighty. Towards the end the god figure tells bruce that instead of looking outside of themselves humanity should just start creating the outcomes that they desired. "Be The Miracle" was the phrase.

That's what it's all about. If we all stopped being "Crying out for Jesus" gimps then we could all start to take back the power and create a future which would "empower" everyone. No bible or sunday black suit necessary. Just molding the future from the core of our hearts.

That's my .02 cents. Peace! And as the others said before me, Heaven is a state of mind. I suggest you all find it now and not wait for it.
 
Originally posted by: Gravity
Yes, I will be getting and spending eternity there. which is a very long time

There are many misconceptions about hell. Don't be fooled, there will be no party.

For those of you that are a bit dismayed at answering this poll with "no", you may want to reconsider your choice.

1. God's plan is for us to be with him (not seperated from him in hell)
2. Sin seperates us from God.
3. Sin cannot be overcome by good works or good deeds or a good life.
4. Jesus Christ already paid the price for your sin so you can re-unite with god
5. It's free but not automatic, you have to put your faith in Christ to be "saved.

It's up to YOU, not up to God.

Gravity
1. Maybe, assuming you a) believe in God, and b) believe in people spending eternity in Hell. That and there being one being called Satan are both mistranslations (it's the eternity bit for Hell...God's chosen get in first, the rest roast until they're purged and all). Given the time frame, they could very well have both been intentional mistranslations.
2. OK, but you really need to define sin in this context.
3. Then its no wonder there will only 144,000 people.
4. Tables chairs and oaken chests would have suited Jesus best. he;d have caused nobody harm--no one alarm. 😀
Anyway...if that's the case, why should we be worried? If he died for them it's already taken care of, right?
5. Putting your faith in any thing or being is not free. It takes great force of will, because it involves giving up control of your own decisions to some one or thing else. In addition, you're to have faith in something that does not show itself to you, whose main organization over the last fifteen hundred years has not been the nicest, and you're supposed to believe all of this stuff just because someone else says so? Sorry, but that's not too convincing. Your list portrays a God who is anything but just--denying paradise to people simply because of the way he created them and the way they grew up.

If it is up to me, then #3 and #5 may be eliminated. If they remain, then it is not up to me. I never made a choice not to have faith...I just realized one day that I had never had it and had simply been going through the motions. In additon, each sect of Christianity defines sins differently...so that can get very wierd.
 
Well, since I'm one helluva guy, of course I would be let in to heaven. Since I don't believe in the afterlife and I wouldn't want to spend eternity with a bunch of whiny @ss christians, I think I should have at least a choice of where to spend eternity. :beer:
 
If you died today, would you be let into Heaven?

Of course, not. I'm a sinner and as such I must burn in Hell. But I'm sure at times Hell seems like more fun to me than what that boring paradise of yours can offer.
 
A pointless question.

If I could think like god and possibly know the answer as the OP request's then of COURSE i would be "let into" heaven, but I'm mortal so I have no way of knowing.

A better question would be, "do you believe you lead a moral life" which is not fraught with the inflammatory religious context.
 
Back
Top