If you could press a button and all the guns in the world...

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Would you press the button?

  • Yes, I would press it

  • No, I wouldn't press it.


Results are only viewable after voting.

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
because we'd go back to killing ourselves with swords, hammers and battle axes, all the while idiots like yourself would declare this new world order as "less savage."

So you'd not press it because you don't want idiots calling that kind of world less savage...?
 

lord_emperor

Golden Member
Nov 4, 2009
1,380
1
0
Wouldn't make a whit of difference, take away whatever you want and humans will still kill each other with rocks if they have to.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,784
6,343
126
Without hesitation, Yes.

If someone possessed such a button and refused to push it, I'd shoot them, then press the button.
 

mattpegher

Platinum Member
Jun 18, 2006
2,203
0
71
No
I am not sure the relationship is causal or incidental, but the human history of early technology suggests that these devices established an equality of power no longer based on might. In large organized groups, strategy and manpower is more important than technology but in smaller groups techonology can be a great equalizer. Therefore the only difference between hitting each other with rocks or bombs is that we switch from might of muscle to might of mind.
 

corwin

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2006
8,644
9
81
Nope...blunt and edged weapons are way messier and and prolong suffering, we're gonna be killing each other one way or another at least make it as quick and efficient as possible.
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
No
I am not sure the relationship is causal or incidental, but the human history of early technology suggests that these devices established an equality of power no longer based on might. In large organized groups, strategy and manpower is more important than technology but in smaller groups techonology can be a great equalizer. Therefore the only difference between hitting each other with rocks or bombs is that we switch from might of muscle to might of mind.

All true, but my point is that a society with rocks kills fewer than a society with bombs (quickly)
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
Nope...blunt and edged weapons are way messier and and prolong suffering, we're gonna be killing each other one way or another at least make it as quick and efficient as possible.

True, but a lot less people would die surely...
 

corwin

Diamond Member
Jan 13, 2006
8,644
9
81
True, but a lot less people would die surely...
Not necessarily...could be the same amount only more "violently"...or maybe less would "die" and more would just be horribly maimed for the rest of their lives...
 

schneiderguy

Lifer
Jun 26, 2006
10,801
91
91
All true, but my point is that a society with rocks kills fewer than a society with bombs (quickly)

In a society without guns the strong can prey on the weak.

In a society with guns the weak can defend themselves.

In your gun free utopia, there'd be gangs of strong men running around killing and raping women and children.