If widespread violence breaks out in the Middle East how much blame falls on Trump?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

How much blame should be assigned to Trump if widespread violence breaks out

  • All of the blame

    Votes: 19 27.5%
  • Most of the blame

    Votes: 19 27.5%
  • Some of the blame

    Votes: 10 14.5%
  • None of the blame

    Votes: 21 30.4%

  • Total voters
    69

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
36,106
27,877
136
Clinton, Bush, Obama and Trump ( more than likely many others ) all accepted that Jerusalem was the capital of Israel.

The area has always been war torn. And probably always will be.

Anything and everything we have tried has at best been met with Very Limited or no success at all. Mostly the latter.

This Trump declaration makes no difference in the least. Other than all of the panty bunching.
You break it you bought it.

Its not uncommon for heads of State to say things for their own public consumption and do the opposite behind the scenes. Trump took the national stage and made a worldwide pronouncement for all. Not only that he's begun the process of relocating our embassy.

The reason diplomacy is so complicated its not always about how you perceive things. Almost every world leader told him not to do this and he did it anyway. Beat a hornets nest with a stick you are responsible for the swarm. He now owns the consequences.

What did the United States gain from this? Was it in our interests or just a bone for evangelicals?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie
Jan 25, 2011
16,607
8,735
146
How does any of what you just said deal with what pcgeek and I have said?

"Clinton, Bush, Obama and Trump ( more than likely many others ) all accepted that Jerusalem was the capital of Israel.

The area has always been war torn. And probably always will be.

Anything and everything we have tried has at best been met with Very Limited or no success at all. Mostly the latter.

This Trump declaration makes no difference in the least. Other than all of the panty bunching."

Is there something you disagree with there?
Yes. The characterization that Trump is only doing what should have been done long ago. They never intended it to be done. They knew presidents wouldn't do it due to the damaging nature of the act. Every president who has said anything about Jerusalem has always qualified it with the fact that it has to be part of a broader peace negotiation in the region. Read the waivers that have been signed in the past. Every president know how stupid this action was if it was just done unilaterally.

Saying "all presidents have said" while ignoring the fact they also qualified it with the peace process is only telling half the story.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
69,202
27,187
136
The Palestinians can have their own place just not in Israel.
Hence a two state solution, which Trump just made more difficult to achieve. Now if the Israeli army and settlers would pack up and move back to Israel, progress might be made in spite of Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
21,369
4,494
136
You break it you bought it.

Its not uncommon for heads of State to say things for their own public consumption and do the opposite behind the scenes. Trump took the national stage and made a worldwide pronouncement for all. Not only that he's begun the process of relocating our embassy.

The reason diplomacy is so complicated its not always about how you perceive things. Almost every world leader told him not to do this and he did it anyway. Beat a hornets nest with a stick you are responsible for the swarm. He now owns the consequences.

What did the United States gain from this? Was it in our interests or just a bone for evangelicals?


Opinion piece. Thanks.
 

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,033
4,798
136
Hence a two state solution, which Trump just made more difficult to achieve. Now if the Israeli army and settlers would pack up and move back to Israel, progress might be made in spite of Trump.
Gentlemen this blood feud will continue no matter what concessions you make for the Palestinians. They will never be happy unless they can wipe out the Jews which will never happen.
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
Yes. The characterization that Trump is only doing what should have been done long ago. They never intended it to be done. They knew presidents wouldn't do it due to the damaging nature of the act. Every president who has said anything about Jerusalem has always qualified it with the fact that it has to be part of a broader peace negotiation in the region. Read the waivers that have been signed in the past. Every president know how stupid this action was if it was just done unilaterally.

Saying "all presidents have said" while ignoring the fact they also qualified it with the peace process is only telling half the story.

Nobody characterized it as needing to be done. That was not said explicitly or implicitly.

To say it was never intended to be done would be false though, as clearly there was some intention to do it. It was desired, mainly by a set of core Republicans, but also by some Dems. Just because previous presidents have said that it should also be done with a peace negotiation has nothing to do with what was said by me and pcgeek. You are injecting a response to something that was not said.
 

FerrelGeek

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2009
4,670
271
126
Yeah, the calls for three days of rage has nothing to do with Trump’s statement.

People in that area of the world will look for any reason to go off. The sad part of this is that the surrounding Arab countries don't give a rat's a** about the Palestinians. Calling them pawns would overvalue them in the eyes of those countries.
 

realibrad

Lifer
Oct 18, 2013
12,337
898
126
Gentlemen this blood feud will continue no matter what concessions you make for the Palestinians. They will never be happy unless they can wipe out the Jews which will never happen.

And the Jews will continue to take ownership of land where people are already living. Palestine is just as averse to peace as Israel. Kicking people out of their homes because you want to build something for your people is a great way to piss people off.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
69,202
27,187
136
Gentlemen this blood feud will continue no matter what concessions you make for the Palestinians. They will never be happy unless they can wipe out the Jews which will never happen.
Ridiculous. Jews and Arabs lived side by side for centuries in that land.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
If the Palestinians aren’t mature enough to accept an embassy in Jerusalem then they sure as hell aren’t ready to negotiate peace. Let them be angry, not like they need any excuses anyway.
 

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,033
4,798
136
Dehumanization is a great way to reach peace.
Would you want your neighbors defining how you can use the rooms in your home? I think not just as Israel has the right to name their own capitol. The Palestinians want something that doesn't belong to them and are now raising hell over it.
 

BurnItDwn

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
26,084
1,561
126
I don't like trump, but honestly, I would blame the violence on the people who activly engaged in the disenfranchisement and deprivation of others. I would blame whoever is in power in the middle east that riles up the people. Trump is a bully and likely a fool and probably senile too, but, he's more likely just to be a scapegoat here.
 

FerrelGeek

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2009
4,670
271
126
Ridiculous. Jews and Arabs lived side by side for centuries in that land.

They did, but sadly, those days are gone and will remain that way until the surrounding countries stop using the Palestinians as cannon fodder.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,914
2,359
126
One country in the ME attacks another country in the ME and its a US POTUS thats responsible? Well, no. Not at all.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Dehumanization is a great way to reach peace.

If you think relocating an embassy is creating "dehumanization" then you ought to relook at what that word means. If you think that excusing away bad behavior, violence, or willingness to engage in the peace process is OK because of an embassy relocation and want to call that "dehumanizing" then you're as much a part of the problem as anything.
 

SlowSpyder

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
17,305
1,001
126
If something happens on the other side of the world, how can we blame Trump?

More accurate thread title.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
69,202
27,187
136
If the Palestinians aren’t mature enough to accept an embassy in Jerusalem then they sure as hell aren’t ready to negotiate peace. Let them be angry, not like they need any excuses anyway.

If you think relocating an embassy is creating "dehumanization" then you ought to relook at what that word means. If you think that excusing away bad behavior, violence, or willingness to engage in the peace process is OK because of an embassy relocation and want to call that "dehumanizing" then you're as much a part of the problem as anything.

Your words are dehumanizing.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
Your words are dehumanizing.

I think the word you're looking for is "infantilizing" not dehumanizing. As in civilized people don't throw temper tantrums over embassies and Palestinians shouldn't be rewarded for misbehavior or the threat of it, being someone that excuses that behavior away is infantilizing them. Dehumanizing them would be saying something like what Arabs like to say about Israelis, stuff like "they're cockroaches." If you want to argue that fairness indicates we should move the U.S. Consulate for the Palestinian Authority from Ramallah or wherever it is to East Jerusalem I'd be fine with that also.
 

Capt Caveman

Lifer
Jan 30, 2005
34,547
651
126
If the Palestinians aren’t mature enough to accept an embassy in Jerusalem then they sure as hell aren’t ready to negotiate peace. Let them be angry, not like they need any excuses anyway.

No other country has an embassy in Jerusalem. No reason to stir things up and no reason to spend the money and resources to do it other than to deflect.