If Trump wins

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,695
31,043
146
zinfamous is more or less a doctor, so it will be a service to your mother to post them. He can even schedule an in person inspection if the need arises.

It's true, VRAMdemon. I suggest you listen to my assistant, Scary Overexposed Sunface Beardman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stormkroe

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,622
8,150
136
If Trump wins we all get to see the titties?

Not being facetious, personally discriminatory toward present company or anything like that, but I really don't care to see any lady's bazongas if all they have to do is lift up their skirt a couple of inches. ;)
 

rudder

Lifer
Nov 9, 2000
19,441
86
91
That is it, I've finally been convinced. I can see the light now. I'll change from Stein to Trump. We can't possibly have 8 more years of economic growth, lower unemployment, relative peace, and social progress. We need Trump to take us in a completely different direction.

I needed such great words to convince me. You truly have the best.

Fvck Trump! American needs more safes spaces! Plus we are only $20 trillion in the hole... The Fed is a long way from running out of cash. Plus the moron Qaddafi never donated to the Trump foundation.... Libya deserves all the chaos they have. And with the Middle East burning at least the Muslim population is dropping everyday. Eight more years! Go team Clinton. Just think of the job opportunities Clinton will bring to the defense industry.

Plus I went all in on the Clinton Foundation. Bought 12,000 shares after mortgaging the 15 houses I rent to illegals. Clinton Foundation stock went mad crazy when Hillary was Secretary of State. Hell I could have retired if I had those 12,000 shares when she did the Morocco deal. Think of the profits to be made when she is President. She won't have to worry about the FBI and she can use whatever damn server she wants!
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,334
32,876
136
Fvck Trump! American needs more safes spaces! Plus we are only $20 trillion in the hole... The Fed is a long way from running out of cash. Plus the moron Qaddafi never donated to the Trump foundation.... Libya deserves all the chaos they have. And with the Middle East burning at least the Muslim population is dropping everyday. Eight more years! Go team Clinton. Just think of the job opportunities Clinton will bring to the defense industry.

Plus I went all in on the Clinton Foundation. Bought 12,000 shares after mortgaging the 15 houses I rent to illegals. Clinton Foundation stock went mad crazy when Hillary was Secretary of State. Hell I could have retired if I had those 12,000 shares when she did the Morocco deal. Think of the profits to be made when she is President. She won't have to worry about the FBI and she can use whatever damn server she wants!
I think having bouncing ball would really help in reading your posts.

Begin at 4:00
 

DrDoug

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2014
3,580
1,629
136
Troll troll troll your post,
gently up the page.
Merrily merrily merrily merrily,
laughing while they rage.


:D
 

Sonikku

Lifer
Jun 23, 2005
15,882
4,882
136
What makes you think he will deliver meaningful change?

Clinton would prop up a failing system. Trump would accelerate its decent into the ground. What would rise from those ashes? Something better or worse? Probably the latter. Though it will indisputably be a meaningful change even if it is not necessarily a positive one.
 

HamburgerBoy

Lifer
Apr 12, 2004
27,111
318
126
That is it, I've finally been convinced. I can see the light now. I'll change from Stein to Trump. We can't possibly have 8 more years of economic growth, lower unemployment, relative peace, and social progress. We need Trump to take us in a completely different direction.

I needed such great words to convince me. You truly have the best.

A vote for Stein is a vote for Trump, so you aren't changing anything. You're either #WithHerOrAgainstHer.
 

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,187
4,871
136
If Trump wins I fully expect to hear yee haws and gunfire, otherwise we'll all get a good nights sleep.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,836
2,620
136
If Trump wins we will definitely see "meaningful" change-but certainly not positive change. The USA will be dumped from its position as default currency and world leader within a very short time (probably five years or under for the currency matter), we will be involved in numerous more wars as opponents seek to test this naive leader, many other countries will rush to secretly develop nuclear weapons as their perception will be mutual defense treaties with the USA are now worthless. In addition the deficit will skyrocket if his tax giveaway to the ultra-rich passes.

Yes, a whole lot of bad will happen, and happen pretty fast-if that is what OP means by meaningful change. On the positive side the NRA lobby will be thrilled and gun sales will continue to ramp up as US society falls apart.
 

Puffnstuff

Lifer
Mar 9, 2005
16,187
4,871
136
Not only will you all get rich, folks!
You will also get amazing accounts for the "Bigger Penis" pills from Infowars! Win-Win situation! Rich AND big penis!
The bigger penis comes with the penalty of a simultaneous brain shrinkage of equal size.:eek::p
 

DrDoug

Diamond Member
Jan 16, 2014
3,580
1,629
136
The bigger penis comes with the penalty of a simultaneous brain shrinkage of equal size.:eek::p

Don't forget the brain damage suffered from blood loss/oxygen deprivation every time they get an erection.
 

mikeymikec

Lifer
May 19, 2011
20,385
15,081
136
Its sad to know that the UK also has stupid people too.

We proved that conclusively with the referendum result.

sadly, they have their own
20160515Boris-Johnson.jpg

And this guy:
Ukip-leader-Nigel-Farage.jpg
 
Last edited:

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,913
4,506
126
A vote for Stein is a vote for Trump, so you aren't changing anything. You're either #WithHerOrAgainstHer.
That isn't true for me because of the electoral college. My vote makes zero difference at all because of where I live. It is so heavily for Trump, that I can not possibly get enough voters to switch the state.

If I were in a swing state, then your comment would be true. But I am not.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
A vote for Stein is a vote for Trump, so you aren't changing anything. You're either #WithHerOrAgainstHer.

That isn't true for me because of the electoral college. My vote makes zero difference at all because of where I live. It is so heavily for Trump, that I can not possibly get enough voters to switch the state.

If I were in a swing state, then your comment would be true. But I am not.

It's not true in a swing state either. A vote for Stein isn't a vote for Trump no matter where you are, it's a vote for Stein. Don't listen to the people supporting the major candidates who love claiming "false equivalency" at inappropriate times when they peddle an actual false equivalency like "a vote for (insert non-major party candidate here) is a vote for (insert unfavorably viewed major party candidate here). It's a bullsh!t argument and they know it.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,913
4,506
126
It's not true in a swing state either. A vote for Stein isn't a vote for Trump no matter where you are, it's a vote for Stein. Don't listen to the people supporting the major candidates who love claiming "false equivalency" at inappropriate times when they peddle an actual false equivalency like "a vote for (insert non-major party candidate here) is a vote for (insert unfavorably viewed major party candidate here). It's a bullsh!t argument and they know it.
I disagree. It was valid when Perot took enough votes to get Clinton elected over Bush Sr. It was valid when Nader took enough votes to get Bush Jr. elected over Gore.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,695
31,043
146
I disagree. It was valid when Perot took enough votes to get Clinton elected over Bush Sr. It was valid when Nader took enough votes to get Bush Jr. elected over Gore.

I don't think it's necessarily true for Perot, as a good portion of those votes would have likely been Clinton votes, anyway (during his first/only hiatus as a candidate, Perot strongly endorsed Clinton, for one thing), but I don't recall the specific state-by-state breakdown and how that might have turned some states.

For Nader, that's a pretty good argument. Besides the fact that Nader voters would have more likely voted for Gore--assuming they vote at all--the votes were so close in FL that without Nader, Gore would almost certainly have won FL and won the presidency.
 
Last edited:

RichUK

Lifer
Feb 14, 2005
10,341
678
126
Lol, Clinton's lead is steadily being eroded. Her lead is down to 2.2% now, based on Real Clear Politics data source. Much funtage.