• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

If Trump wins

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
RichUK said:
If Trump wins we all get to see the titties?
Click to expand...

Not being facetious, personally discriminatory toward present company or anything like that, but I really don't care to see any lady's bazongas if all they have to do is lift up their skirt a couple of inches. 😉
 
dullard said:
That is it, I've finally been convinced. I can see the light now. I'll change from Stein to Trump. We can't possibly have 8 more years of economic growth, lower unemployment, relative peace, and social progress. We need Trump to take us in a completely different direction.

I needed such great words to convince me. You truly have the best.
Click to expand...

Fvck Trump! American needs more safes spaces! Plus we are only $20 trillion in the hole... The Fed is a long way from running out of cash. Plus the moron Qaddafi never donated to the Trump foundation.... Libya deserves all the chaos they have. And with the Middle East burning at least the Muslim population is dropping everyday. Eight more years! Go team Clinton. Just think of the job opportunities Clinton will bring to the defense industry.

Plus I went all in on the Clinton Foundation. Bought 12,000 shares after mortgaging the 15 houses I rent to illegals. Clinton Foundation stock went mad crazy when Hillary was Secretary of State. Hell I could have retired if I had those 12,000 shares when she did the Morocco deal. Think of the profits to be made when she is President. She won't have to worry about the FBI and she can use whatever damn server she wants!
 
rudder said:
Fvck Trump! American needs more safes spaces! Plus we are only $20 trillion in the hole... The Fed is a long way from running out of cash. Plus the moron Qaddafi never donated to the Trump foundation.... Libya deserves all the chaos they have. And with the Middle East burning at least the Muslim population is dropping everyday. Eight more years! Go team Clinton. Just think of the job opportunities Clinton will bring to the defense industry.

Plus I went all in on the Clinton Foundation. Bought 12,000 shares after mortgaging the 15 houses I rent to illegals. Clinton Foundation stock went mad crazy when Hillary was Secretary of State. Hell I could have retired if I had those 12,000 shares when she did the Morocco deal. Think of the profits to be made when she is President. She won't have to worry about the FBI and she can use whatever damn server she wants!
Click to expand...
I think having bouncing ball would really help in reading your posts.

Begin at 4:00
 
Troll troll troll your post,
gently up the page.
Merrily merrily merrily merrily,
laughing while they rage.

😀
 
fskimospy said:
What makes you think he will deliver meaningful change?
Click to expand...

Clinton would prop up a failing system. Trump would accelerate its decent into the ground. What would rise from those ashes? Something better or worse? Probably the latter. Though it will indisputably be a meaningful change even if it is not necessarily a positive one.
 
dullard said:
That is it, I've finally been convinced. I can see the light now. I'll change from Stein to Trump. We can't possibly have 8 more years of economic growth, lower unemployment, relative peace, and social progress. We need Trump to take us in a completely different direction.

I needed such great words to convince me. You truly have the best.
Click to expand...

A vote for Stein is a vote for Trump, so you aren't changing anything. You're either #WithHerOrAgainstHer.
 
If Trump wins we will definitely see "meaningful" change-but certainly not positive change. The USA will be dumped from its position as default currency and world leader within a very short time (probably five years or under for the currency matter), we will be involved in numerous more wars as opponents seek to test this naive leader, many other countries will rush to secretly develop nuclear weapons as their perception will be mutual defense treaties with the USA are now worthless. In addition the deficit will skyrocket if his tax giveaway to the ultra-rich passes.

Yes, a whole lot of bad will happen, and happen pretty fast-if that is what OP means by meaningful change. On the positive side the NRA lobby will be thrilled and gun sales will continue to ramp up as US society falls apart.
 
flexy said:
Not only will you all get rich, folks!
You will also get amazing accounts for the "Bigger Penis" pills from Infowars! Win-Win situation! Rich AND big penis!
Click to expand...
The bigger penis comes with the penalty of a simultaneous brain shrinkage of equal size.😱😛
 
ivwshane said:
Its sad to know that the UK also has stupid people too.
Click to expand...

We proved that conclusively with the referendum result.

Sheik Yerbouti said:
sadly, they have their own
20160515Boris-Johnson.jpg
Click to expand...

And this guy:
Ukip-leader-Nigel-Farage.jpg
 
Last edited:
HamburgerBoy said:
A vote for Stein is a vote for Trump, so you aren't changing anything. You're either #WithHerOrAgainstHer.
Click to expand...
That isn't true for me because of the electoral college. My vote makes zero difference at all because of where I live. It is so heavily for Trump, that I can not possibly get enough voters to switch the state.

If I were in a swing state, then your comment would be true. But I am not.
 
HamburgerBoy said:
A vote for Stein is a vote for Trump, so you aren't changing anything. You're either #WithHerOrAgainstHer.
Click to expand...

dullard said:
That isn't true for me because of the electoral college. My vote makes zero difference at all because of where I live. It is so heavily for Trump, that I can not possibly get enough voters to switch the state.

If I were in a swing state, then your comment would be true. But I am not.
Click to expand...

It's not true in a swing state either. A vote for Stein isn't a vote for Trump no matter where you are, it's a vote for Stein. Don't listen to the people supporting the major candidates who love claiming "false equivalency" at inappropriate times when they peddle an actual false equivalency like "a vote for (insert non-major party candidate here) is a vote for (insert unfavorably viewed major party candidate here). It's a bullsh!t argument and they know it.
 
glenn1 said:
It's not true in a swing state either. A vote for Stein isn't a vote for Trump no matter where you are, it's a vote for Stein. Don't listen to the people supporting the major candidates who love claiming "false equivalency" at inappropriate times when they peddle an actual false equivalency like "a vote for (insert non-major party candidate here) is a vote for (insert unfavorably viewed major party candidate here). It's a bullsh!t argument and they know it.
Click to expand...
I disagree. It was valid when Perot took enough votes to get Clinton elected over Bush Sr. It was valid when Nader took enough votes to get Bush Jr. elected over Gore.
 
dullard said:
I disagree. It was valid when Perot took enough votes to get Clinton elected over Bush Sr. It was valid when Nader took enough votes to get Bush Jr. elected over Gore.
Click to expand...

I don't think it's necessarily true for Perot, as a good portion of those votes would have likely been Clinton votes, anyway (during his first/only hiatus as a candidate, Perot strongly endorsed Clinton, for one thing), but I don't recall the specific state-by-state breakdown and how that might have turned some states.

For Nader, that's a pretty good argument. Besides the fact that Nader voters would have more likely voted for Gore--assuming they vote at all--the votes were so close in FL that without Nader, Gore would almost certainly have won FL and won the presidency.
 
Last edited:
Lol, Clinton's lead is steadily being eroded. Her lead is down to 2.2% now, based on Real Clear Politics data source. Much funtage.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top