Originally posted by: mobobuff
Nope, too many possibilities for technicalities. Bad idea.
Killing them individually, yes.
Originally posted by: loic2003
Lots of myopic knee-jerk reactions in here....
In other places around the world, the age of consent is as low as 9.
Perhaps it's just a case of our culture objecting to younger people having sex?
Also, bear in mind that in some areas on the planet, homosexuality is illegal and punishable by death. Less than 100 years ago, even in the UK homosexuality was seen as a sick disease and people were subjected to shock treatment in order to 'cure' them. These days, homosexuality is widely accepted by most western individuals. We know that it's their sexual preferance that they have little control over. How is this different to having a sexual preference for younger people, bearing in mind that in other parts of the world they could give consent at 12?
Don't get me wrong, I despise child abuse, but instead of everyone having a witch hunt for those evil peedos, lets take a step back and take a look at the bigger picture.
Originally posted by: loic2003
Lots of myopic knee-jerk reactions in here....
In other places around the world, the age of consent is as low as 9.
Perhaps it's just a case of our culture objecting to younger people having sex?
Also, bear in mind that in some areas on the planet, homosexuality is illegal and punishable by death. Less than 100 years ago, even in the UK homosexuality was seen as a sick disease and people were subjected to shock treatment in order to 'cure' them. These days, homosexuality is widely accepted by most western individuals. We know that it's their sexual preferance that they have little control over. How is this different to having a sexual preference for younger people, bearing in mind that in other parts of the world they could give consent at 12?
Don't get me wrong, I despise child abuse, but instead of everyone having a witch hunt for those evil peedos, lets take a step back and take a look at the bigger picture.
Originally posted by: BudAshes
How could that ever be justifiable? Explain this too me mister bigger picture.
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
Originally posted by: loic2003
Lots of myopic knee-jerk reactions in here....
In other places around the world, the age of consent is as low as 9.
Perhaps it's just a case of our culture objecting to younger people having sex?
Also, bear in mind that in some areas on the planet, homosexuality is illegal and punishable by death. Less than 100 years ago, even in the UK homosexuality was seen as a sick disease and people were subjected to shock treatment in order to 'cure' them. These days, homosexuality is widely accepted by most western individuals. We know that it's their sexual preferance that they have little control over. How is this different to having a sexual preference for younger people, bearing in mind that in other parts of the world they could give consent at 12?
Don't get me wrong, I despise child abuse, but instead of everyone having a witch hunt for those evil peedos, lets take a step back and take a look at the bigger picture.
It sounds much like you're simply saying "there are no blacks or whites, only grays," and blurring the lines between "moral" and "immoral." Well all know what Ayn Rand said about that.
When a man declares: "There are no blacks and whites" he is making a psychological confession, and what he means is: "I am unwilling to be wholly good?and please don't regard me as wholly evil!" --Ayn Rand
Because one country makes it legal, that doesn't make it right. In many countries it's illegal to be a certain religion or have a certain opinion. Does that make that viewpoint acceptable.
I think you could fully classify having sex with someone that young as wrong and immoral based on scientific and psychological evidence alone.
Your post was the biggest knee jerk post on this board. Another person with no morality trying to blur the lines of morality and negate all evil in the world as only relative.
Originally posted by: loic2003
but I wanted to put it out there that it isn't black and white, despite what some may think. It's tough,
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
Originally posted by: loic2003
but I wanted to put it out there that it isn't black and white, despite what some may think. It's tough,
Ok Michael Jackson.
To be honest, having an attraction is not wrong. But when that attraction exist, and the person has insufficient morals to keep their actions at bay, is when they go around molesting kids.
Given that most people in general do not have enough morals or enough will power to keep such an attraction at bay, I would say having that sort of attraction is a very serious danger.
But the question was for people who molested, not people who would "want" to molest. So unlike what you said, this is not a "tough" question to answer. Those are have molested need to fry.
Originally posted by: JLGatsby
Originally posted by: loic2003
Lots of myopic knee-jerk reactions in here....
In other places around the world, the age of consent is as low as 9.
Perhaps it's just a case of our culture objecting to younger people having sex?
Also, bear in mind that in some areas on the planet, homosexuality is illegal and punishable by death. Less than 100 years ago, even in the UK homosexuality was seen as a sick disease and people were subjected to shock treatment in order to 'cure' them. These days, homosexuality is widely accepted by most western individuals. We know that it's their sexual preferance that they have little control over. How is this different to having a sexual preference for younger people, bearing in mind that in other parts of the world they could give consent at 12?
Don't get me wrong, I despise child abuse, but instead of everyone having a witch hunt for those evil peedos, lets take a step back and take a look at the bigger picture.
It sounds much like you're simply saying "there are no blacks or whites, only grays," and blurring the lines between "moral" and "immoral." Well all know what Ayn Rand said about that.
When a man declares: "There are no blacks and whites" he is making a psychological confession, and what he means is: "I am unwilling to be wholly good?and please don't regard me as wholly evil!" --Ayn Rand
Because one country makes it legal, that doesn't make it right. In many countries it's illegal to be a certain religion or have a certain opinion. Does that make that viewpoint acceptable.
I think you could fully classify having sex with someone that young as wrong and immoral based on scientific and psychological evidence alone.
Your post was the biggest knee jerk post on this board. Another person with no morality trying to blur the lines of morality and negate all evil in the world as only relative.
Originally posted by: DAGTA
It is not my place to judge who should live and who should die.
Originally posted by: DAGTA
It is not my place to judge who should live and who should die.
Originally posted by: jdini76
I would wait for the magic button to cure these sick people.
Originally posted by: BudAshes
that would instantly incinerate any adult(17+) who has ever sexually molested a child(12 and under).
Originally posted by: jdini76
I would wait for the magic button to cure these sick people.
