If there was a magic button you could hit...

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
BudAshes

BudAshes

Lifer
Jul 20, 2003
13,991
3,348
146
that would instantly incinerate any adult(17+) who has ever sexually molested a child(12 and under).


 
Chaotic42

Chaotic42

Lifer
Jun 15, 2001
34,876
2,037
126
Define child molestation.

Are we talking an 18 year old having sex with a 17 year old? I have no problem with that.
 
K

kindest

Platinum Member
Dec 15, 2001
2,697
0
0
repeating molestors who know exactly what they are doing.
id tape the button down.
 
mobobuff

mobobuff

Lifer
Apr 5, 2004
11,099
1
81
Nope, too many possibilities for technicalities. Bad idea.

Killing them individually, yes.
 
Captante

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,353
10,877
136
To me it would also depend on wether the child in question was injured/killed or wether the act had been repeated.

If the answer to any of those is yes, I'd be sorely tempted to push it.
 
H

Howard

Lifer
Oct 14, 1999
47,982
11
81
I don't know, but I would do it for anybody who WILL molest (with intent) a child in the future.
 
H

HombrePequeno

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2001
4,657
0
0
That would free up a few houses around where I live.

Who are the three fvcks that either molested a kid or know someone who did?
 
C

Chiropteran

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2003
9,811
110
106
Originally posted by: BudAshes
ok tried to define it more clearly.
Click to expand...

It's the "molest" part that needs to be defined.


For example is it molesting a kid if a medical Doctor performs a physical?

Probably not, but what if the doctor is sexually attracted to kids? Now is it considered molestation, if he gets off on it? If so, why the distinction? If not, why is it okay for him to do it but not someone who isn't a doctor?

Say it's some pervert daycare worker changing baby diapers. What if the worker is some kind of pervert that gets off on that, does he die? What if he doesn't actually touch the kid any different than other workers when they change the diapers?

What about "indirect" molestation, like a guy watching kiddy porn, the guy isn't molesting the kids directly but he creates the market that caused the kids to be molested.


Is it just intent? How can you ever really know the intent in every case? What if the pervert in question gets off through purely verbal molestation, would he still be killed just because he talked dirty to some kids? What if he thought about it but never acted on it? What if he thought he was talking dirty to a kid, but it was really someone acting as a kid for a sting operation?

What if you were the owener/editor of a legit porno magazine, and somehow someone put in some pictures of an 11 year old without your knowledge?

What if the button had a bug, like measuring a person age by the number of birthdays they had, then a 40 year old woman born on leap-year would still be treated as a 10 year old kid and anyone who ever had sex with her would be killed.

To many variables really, I wouldn't push the button.
 
BudAshes

BudAshes

Lifer
Jul 20, 2003
13,991
3,348
146
Originally posted by: Chiropteran
Originally posted by: BudAshes
ok tried to define it more clearly.
Click to expand...

It's the "molest" part that needs to be defined.


For example is it molesting a kid if a medical Doctor performs a physical?

Probably not, but what if the doctor is sexually attracted to kids? Now is it considered molestation, if he gets off on it? If so, why the distinction? If not, why is it okay for him to do it but not someone who isn't a doctor?

Say it's some pervert daycare worker changing baby diapers. What if the worker is some kind of pervert that gets off on that, does he die? What if he doesn't actually touch the kid any different than other workers when they change the diapers?

What about "indirect" molestation, like a guy watching kiddy porn, the guy isn't molesting the kids directly but he creates the market that caused the kids to be molested.


Is it just intent? How can you ever really know the intent in every case? What if the pervert in question gets off through purely verbal molestation, would he still be killed just because he talked dirty to some kids? What if he thought about it but never acted on it? What if he thought he was talking dirty to a kid, but it was really someone acting as a kid for a sting operation?

What if you were the owener/editor of a legit porno magazine, and somehow someone put in some pictures of an 11 year old without your knowledge?

What if the button had a bug, like measuring a person age by the number of birthdays they had, then a 40 year old woman born on leap-year would still be treated as a 10 year old kid and anyone who ever had sex with her would be killed.

To many variables really, I wouldn't push the button.
Click to expand...

You have to have physically touched someone to sexually molest them. Age is defined in standard earth years. Some of those people you described might deserve to be grouped in with these people but this button is for molestors only.
 
L

loic2003

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2003
3,844
0
0
Lots of myopic knee-jerk reactions in here....


In other places around the world, the age of consent is as low as 9.

Perhaps it's just a case of our culture objecting to younger people having sex?

Also, bear in mind that in some areas on the planet, homosexuality is illegal and punishable by death. Less than 100 years ago, even in the UK homosexuality was seen as a sick disease and people were subjected to shock treatment in order to 'cure' them. These days, homosexuality is widely accepted by most western individuals. We know that it's their sexual preferance that they have little control over. How is this different to having a sexual preference for younger people, bearing in mind that in other parts of the world they could give consent at 12?

Don't get me wrong, I despise child abuse, but instead of everyone having a witch hunt for those evil peedos, lets take a step back and take a look at the bigger picture.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom