If there is really a God then why do people NEED a book to tell them what is right and wrong

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Ryan
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: SaltBoy
Originally posted by: Vic
Of course they do. It's just that the God they believe in has very little to do with their fighting. It just provides them with one more excuse among many to hate each other. All war is large scale armed robbery and nothing else.
Anyone who thinks that wars would disappear if religion disappeared is pretty much a clueless idiot and/or a bigot obsessed with controlling the beliefs of others (i.e., religion = crimethink).
Good point, but I don't see religion going away any time soon, and I *DO* see religion as arguably the biggest influence on war. If you want religion in general to go away because you're an agnostic/atheist, then your pushing your agnostic/atheist religion on others who have a more concrete faith.
Religion didn't cause any of the wars that America has fought. War is fought for power and resources.

I don't understand your comment about a "more concrete faith." An atheist can be just as zealous in their faith as a nun if they want to be.

Religion doesn't cause wars because religion isn't a singular object. Religion is a belief system, and that belief system dictates people's actions.

Okay. Name a war where religious belief systems were the primary cause of the war, and provide us with background on that cause.

LMFAO, are you insane?

How about the war in Afghanistan? To weed out terrorists who attack us because of their religious beliefs. Are you really that dense?
You think those terrorists attack us because of their/our religious beliefs? Or that we attack them in return for our/their religious beliefs? Are you really that naive?

They attacked us because we are in their "holy land" and because we support Israel who is in their "holy land." We didn't attack them because of religion, we attacked them because they flew planes into the fvcking World trade center and pentagon.
:laugh:

Repeat after me: the key word is LAND.
 

Fraggable

Platinum Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,799
0
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Ryan
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: SaltBoy
Originally posted by: Vic
Of course they do. It's just that the God they believe in has very little to do with their fighting. It just provides them with one more excuse among many to hate each other. All war is large scale armed robbery and nothing else.
Anyone who thinks that wars would disappear if religion disappeared is pretty much a clueless idiot and/or a bigot obsessed with controlling the beliefs of others (i.e., religion = crimethink).
Good point, but I don't see religion going away any time soon, and I *DO* see religion as arguably the biggest influence on war. If you want religion in general to go away because you're an agnostic/atheist, then your pushing your agnostic/atheist religion on others who have a more concrete faith.
Religion didn't cause any of the wars that America has fought. War is fought for power and resources.

I don't understand your comment about a "more concrete faith." An atheist can be just as zealous in their faith as a nun if they want to be.

Religion doesn't cause wars because religion isn't a singular object. Religion is a belief system, and that belief system dictates people's actions.

Okay. Name a war where religious belief systems were the primary cause of the war, and provide us with background on that cause.

LMFAO, are you insane?

How about the war in Afghanistan? To weed out terrorists who attack us because of their religious beliefs. Are you really that dense?
You think those terrorists attack us because of their/our religious beliefs? Or that we attack them in return for our/their religious beliefs? Are you really that naive?

Do you know what 'Jihad' means? Look it up. That's what they're calling this war. It is a religious factor in this war on terrorism. It's what they call it when they blow up car bombs on US troops.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Fraggable
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Ryan
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: SaltBoy
Originally posted by: Vic
Of course they do. It's just that the God they believe in has very little to do with their fighting. It just provides them with one more excuse among many to hate each other. All war is large scale armed robbery and nothing else.
Anyone who thinks that wars would disappear if religion disappeared is pretty much a clueless idiot and/or a bigot obsessed with controlling the beliefs of others (i.e., religion = crimethink).
Good point, but I don't see religion going away any time soon, and I *DO* see religion as arguably the biggest influence on war. If you want religion in general to go away because you're an agnostic/atheist, then your pushing your agnostic/atheist religion on others who have a more concrete faith.
Religion didn't cause any of the wars that America has fought. War is fought for power and resources.

I don't understand your comment about a "more concrete faith." An atheist can be just as zealous in their faith as a nun if they want to be.

Religion doesn't cause wars because religion isn't a singular object. Religion is a belief system, and that belief system dictates people's actions.

Okay. Name a war where religious belief systems were the primary cause of the war, and provide us with background on that cause.

LMFAO, are you insane?

How about the war in Afghanistan? To weed out terrorists who attack us because of their religious beliefs. Are you really that dense?
You think those terrorists attack us because of their/our religious beliefs? Or that we attack them in return for our/their religious beliefs? Are you really that naive?

Do you know what 'Jihad' means? Look it up. That's what they're calling this war. It is a religious factor in this war on terrorism. It's what they call it when they blow up car bombs on US troops.

Jihad is just the rallying cry for the sheep. The same way cries of "freedom" rally our own troops. Jihad, however, is not why they're fighting anymore than "freedom" is why we're fighting.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: Vic

:laugh:

Repeat after me: the key word is LAND.

And why exactly aren't they willing to share the LAND?

Because the laws of physics dictate that 2 bodies of matter can't occupy the same space at the same time?
 

Kev

Lifer
Dec 17, 2001
16,367
4
81
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: Vic

:laugh:

Repeat after me: the key word is LAND.

And why exactly aren't they willing to share the LAND?

Because the laws of physics dictate that 2 bodies of matter can't occupy the same space at the same time?

:roll:

Fine, be a condescending fvck.
 

Cerpin Taxt

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
11,940
542
126
Originally posted by: jagec

The very fundamentals of science depend on universal truth.
This is not actually the case. Science deals with approximations, models of reality. Solipsistic problems prohibit any and every scientific fact from becoming "universal" truth.

If you mean to say that the underpinnings of science are its definitions, then I suppose your statement would hold, but definitions aren't exactly "true" or "false," or at the very most they are trivially true.

The history of western society and the world as a whole has been shaped by those who were able to discover the truths of the world that surrounded them.

It's true that I'm talking physical laws and the underpinnings of technology, things that are provable, and you're talking religion. But the inability to discover or prove a truth in no way implies its nonexistence. Unless you believe that (for example) the laws of relativity came into being only after Einstein started publishing?
Proof, as it is often said, is for mathematics and alcohol. Science does not work with proof in any rigorous sense of the word.

{snip}

Originally posted by: Ryan
And that's where we differ. Truth is not absolute.

Can you say that absolutely?:D
There is a distinction that is ambiguous in his statement: that between a priori and a posteriori truth. The latter suffers from the solipsistic problems I mentioned above, and therefore cannot be consdered "absolute." That fact is something that is knowable a priori, and therefore can be regarded as absolute.

Our knowledge of the truth will never be complete or absolute. But until you can give me an example of any basic principle of life showing irreproducibilities (ie, one day gravity does not pull downwards), an absolute truth is a more logically tenable position than otherwise. I'm always amazed that relativists feel comfortable getting on airplanes...just because we may not know all aspects of truth, doesn't mean it's not there.
Please keep in mind that "truth" is just a word in human language. Like all other words, humans decide what it means, and therefore in all cases truth is necessarily subjective.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Kev
Originally posted by: Vic

:laugh:

Repeat after me: the key word is LAND.

And why exactly aren't they willing to share the LAND?

Because the laws of physics dictate that 2 bodies of matter can't occupy the same space at the same time?

:roll:

Fine, be a condescending fvck.

Be naive.
 

kinev

Golden Member
Mar 28, 2005
1,647
30
91
Originally posted by: Ryan
What evidence have you provided for your position that a singular truth does exist, besides your own unfounded conclusions? Faith isn't evidence, using faith is a way of ending an argument because you've run out of any rational way of explaining that your core belief is founded on NOTHING, but your own selfish desire to give your life meaning.
Originally posted by: Ryan
there is no singular, universal "TRUTH".
Originally posted by: Ryan
I have come to understant that there is indeed ONE concrete thing is the world - that everything is always changing, and that there is no "real" truth.
Originally posted by: Ryan
if there was one singular truth, no being on this earth will ever know it
Originally posted by: Ryan
that is the only constant and true thing
Originally posted by: Ryan
Truth is not absolute


I'm not picking on you, but I find your statements contradictory.
 

gsellis

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,061
0
0
Don't know why I would consider wasting my time considering the OP... Maybe a little joke with a moral will give an example.

There once was this fundamentalist farmer living near the levy on the Mississippi. A big storm was coming and news started warning all folks in the low areas to consider leaving. Well, it starts raining and raining. The sheriff comes to the farmer's house and tells the farmer that he should evacuate because the levy will break. But the farmer refuses to go. "The Lord will protect me!"

The floodwaters rise and the farmer moves his family to the second floor. A boat comes and the folks tell the farmer they can take them to safety. The farmer refuses and tells them, "The Lord will protect me."

The waters keep rising and now the whole family is on the roof. A helicopter comes and tells the farmer that they will evacuate them, but the farmer refuses. "The Lord will protect me!"

They drown.

The farmer is at the Pearly Gates and there is St. Peter.

"Saint Peter! You and the Lord have forsaken me! I put my faith in you to protect me and now I am dead! How can you do this to one of your faithful?"

"We sent a car, boat, and helicopter. What more did you want?"

Moral - It matters not the messenger (aka a book or otherwise), but the willingness to listen. Men are not born moral, but must learn to be moral. That is part of why babies are baptized and their sins forgiven (babies are selfish by nature). But do not confuse the message in the book with those who use it for their own selfish ways. Don't confuse the message that those who misuse the Bible send with what it is trying to say.

Jesus is quoted as summarizing the whole thing when asked which was the most important Commandment. Matthew 22:36-40 - "Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments." That passage is what the Bible is about and sums it all up. You get the Golden Rule out of it, forgiveness, etc.

And if fundies are bugging you, lookup Poppy Dixon for some fun. Gets you links to Landover Baptist Church, MissPoppy, Jesus21 - all reformed fundies. Me, never was a Fundie. I am a PK (Priest, not Preacher - and not Catholic).
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,669
6,728
126
Originally posted by: jagec

Drawing lines and putting things in boxes is the only way that we are able to make sense of the world. Don't think that you are somehow more "free" than anyone else, just because you can see other peoples' boxes and not your own.

Even when we mature and are able to open our minds to ideas and concepts that previously existed outside our boxes, we're only able to do this after having built up a pillar of absolutes that must remain inviolate. To shake this pillar leads to mental anguish, soul-searching, and restructuring of one's entire life, to shatter it leads to madness.

We all have our limits. But they are very hard to see from within oneself; it's much easier to spot limitations in others which we do not possess.

Hehe, you have such uncommon honesty to express these things but let us please go deeper:

1. When you honestly see that other people live in a box, a mental prison, you must infer that it's also true of you.
2. Therefore any pillar of absolutes you construct for yourself is just another illusion.

3. No pain no gain. The entire story of religion and myth tells us that the hero must face tremendous challenges and go through horrible pain. 'In the sea are riches beyond compare, but if you seek safety it is on the shore." Only the insane are sane. The insanity you speak of is both temporary, a paradox, and an illusion, the collapse of which leads to a different but fundamental absolute, a deeper truth for which all our illusions are a substitute.

Let us examine your story from a different point of view:

We were put down as children and made to hate ourselves. We because various egos and not who we really are. What is this ego? It is a substitute for self respect, the attachment of the self to things in the world called good. We were conditioned to be good little boys and girls and to join all the finest teams. My race, my religion, my party, my family, my team, my country, and all the other things I own are the greatest of the great because I was made to feel like a worthless nothing.

So any fool who goes looking for truth and is honest is doomed. He will see first that all the people around him are living in a dream, that all their absolutes are a joke. And that will lead him to the conclusion that the same is true for him.

Naturally this will lead to a frantic search for truth, just as you say, but in the end, it seems to me, one will find either grace, or the realization that everything is a lie. The overwhelming depression and even madness that results is nothing but the surfacing of ones deepest feeling that one is actually worthless just as we were made to feel. In other words we come to the truth of what we really feel in a backward and round about way. We are stripped of the illusion that we are OK because we have destroyed the props our Ego used to keep truth at bey. It is here at last we arrive bereft of all illusions and hope, aware that life has no meaning at all. All of our dreams and ideals and hopes were only illusions and lies and it is here that the ego dies when you fact that truth and all of your pain head on and realize there is no exit from any of it.

There is no hope and no escape and all you can do is collapse and surrender. And suddenly then you can see that meaning and its need are meaningless too. Stripped of all that can be taken you are left only with what you have, the infinite potential for love that is the birthright of every being. Suddenly all the love you ever wanted and sought for yourself and others 'out there' comes pouring our of you. A switch is flipped and the universe turns on. You and the Beloved are one.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,669
6,728
126
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: Vic
What is it about Moonie's posts that always remind me of Fixx lyrics?

"Maybe... someday... "

I have no idea, Vic, as I have never heard of them. but maybe they read my threads or, hold your breath, there is one truth and they use similar words about it too.

I doubt that. The Fixx was an 80's British New Wave group. Their singer and primary lyricist, Cy Curnin, is a Buddhist. The 2 words quoted above are from "Saved by Zero," a song about questing for Nirvana.

That makes sense. I was saved by a zero too, the very moment I became one. :D
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Hehe, you have such uncommon honesty to express these things but let us please go deeper:

1. When you honestly see that other people live in a box, a mental prison, you must infer that it's also true of you.
2. Therefore any pillar of absolutes you construct for yourself is just another illusion.

1: Of course, that was the point of my post. Ryan seemed to think he had superseded the box. I was stating that it's easier to see the limitations of others than yourself.

2: My pillar of truth may be relative, but that does not mean that Truth as a whole is relative. It just means that we as humans can never be certain that we've attained it, since all we have to compare by is our own personal preconceptions, and whatever we are able to infer about others from their words. Since most people are able to agree about certain basic things (gravity, etc), we can be reasonably sure that it's an absolute, independent of the observer. Further observation of those who disagree can solidify this...can those who don't believe in gravity, fly? If so, I may be seriously wrong about the objectivity of that so-called "law".

I suppose the existance of an unprovable absolute Truth is a rather futile argument, but it's a very human train of thought.:)

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
We were put down as children and made to hate ourselves. We because various egos and not who we really are. What is this ego? It is a substitute for self respect, the attachment of the self to things in the world called good. We were conditioned to be good little boys and girls and to join all the finest teams. My race, my religion, my party, my family, my team, my country, and all the other things I own are the greatest of the great because I was made to feel like a worthless nothing.

My childhood was never like that. I guess there are upsides to being raised by hippies.:)
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,669
6,728
126
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Hehe, you have such uncommon honesty to express these things but let us please go deeper:

1. When you honestly see that other people live in a box, a mental prison, you must infer that it's also true of you.
2. Therefore any pillar of absolutes you construct for yourself is just another illusion.

1: Of course, that was the point of my post. Ryan seemed to think he had superseded the box. I was stating that it's easier to see the limitations of others than yourself.

2: My pillar of truth may be relative, but that does not mean that Truth as a whole is relative. It just means that we as humans can never be certain that we've attained it, since all we have to compare by is our own personal preconceptions, and whatever we are able to infer about others from their words. Since most people are able to agree about certain basic things (gravity, etc), we can be reasonably sure that it's an absolute, independent of the observer. Further observation of those who disagree can solidify this...can those who don't believe in gravity, fly? If so, I may be seriously wrong about the objectivity of that so-called "law".

I suppose the existance of an unprovable absolute Truth is a rather futile argument, but it's a very human train of thought.:)

Originally posted by: Moonbeam
We were put down as children and made to hate ourselves. We because various egos and not who we really are. What is this ego? It is a substitute for self respect, the attachment of the self to things in the world called good. We were conditioned to be good little boys and girls and to join all the finest teams. My race, my religion, my party, my family, my team, my country, and all the other things I own are the greatest of the great because I was made to feel like a worthless nothing.

My childhood was never like that. I guess there are upsides to being raised by hippies.:)

My dear Sir, the meaning of life and other existential questions have nothing to do with laws like the law of gravity. Are you saying that because there may be laws that seem absolute that your answers to the meaning of life may be valid when all around you you can see that the answers other people have are not? Hehe, the logic of that escapes me.

As to the feelings of worthlessness you got as a child, I can only say that you have no idea because it's the last thing anybody wants to know and that truth is buried very very very deeply. But you yourself know better than others that it is there because you already have admitted you can sense the 'Madness' that would overcome you if you abandoned your defenses. :)
 

gsellis

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,061
0
0
Originally posted by: her209
How many people of faith have we seen get into an lion's enclosure only to be attacked and killed or nearly killed? Same goes for the people who try to walk on water.
Points to my post. God gave us free will and the ability to choose. It is not his fault that we ignore the messages. I believe in God, but I have also been told that lions and rattlesnakes are dangerous. It is not my job to test God and ignore what I have been told is going to be a Darwin moment (yep, believe in evolution too). Nowhere in the Bible do I remember it saying we must be sheep. And using the Bible and God's name to relieve yourself from using what God gave you, free will and the ability to choose, is a slap in the face to God as I see it.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,669
6,728
126
Originally posted by: gsellis
Originally posted by: her209
How many people of faith have we seen get into an lion's enclosure only to be attacked and killed or nearly killed? Same goes for the people who try to walk on water.
Points to my post. God gave us free will and the ability to choose. It is not his fault that we ignore the messages. I believe in God, but I have also been told that lions and rattlesnakes are dangerous. It is not my job to test God and ignore what I have been told is going to be a Darwin moment (yep, believe in evolution too). Nowhere in the Bible do I remember it saying we must be sheep. And using the Bible and God's name to relieve yourself from using what God gave you, free will and the ability to choose, is a slap in the face to God as I see it.

Hehe, exactly. :D You hold a theory of free will because somehwere it says you have it, but you act at all times in any other sphere except the book acquired one as if you don't. When the lion appears it is you who wills yourself to sh!t in your pants, no?
---------

Everywhere I look all I see are machines. If you want to have free will I would suggest you make your will the will of God. All you need do is surrender your will to what really is. In that way you, your questions, your answers, and all your theories will all disappear. You and your entirety will be the cause of all that is and there will be no you but that cause.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Free will is like driving your car down the highway. You might be at the wheel, but you still have to stay on the road.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,669
6,728
126
Originally posted by: Vic
Free will is like driving your car down the highway. You might be at the wheel, but you still have to stay on the road.

You must drive differently than I do. I just get in and tell the auto-pilot within me where I want to go and he does the rest. If I had to drive I would have a wreck. He drives and I enjoy some radio and loot at the trees. Occasionally I'll scream as he jerks me across three lanes to avoid a crash.
 

meltdown75

Lifer
Nov 17, 2004
37,548
7
81
Not going to read this thread but I guarantee doing so would only cause me to tell most people to STFU and quit debating the most obviously debatable things in the fricking world because it's just old and lame.

religion, god, hey look at me i can start a thread.

STFU
 

gsellis

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 2003
6,061
0
0
Originally posted by: Vic
Free will is like driving your car down the highway. You might be at the wheel, but you still have to stay on the road.
You choose to stay on the highway because that is what you were told you must do and you do not wish to damage yourself or your car. There are consequences for not staying on the road and you have learned to recognize them. Someone and something told you why to stay on the road. Makes the point of why folks wrote the Bible.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,669
6,728
126
Originally posted by: gsellis
Originally posted by: Vic
Free will is like driving your car down the highway. You might be at the wheel, but you still have to stay on the road.
You choose to stay on the highway because that is what you were told you must do and you do not wish to damage yourself or your car. There are consequences for not staying on the road and you have learned to recognize them. Someone and something told you why to stay on the road. Makes the point of why folks wrote the Bible.

Yup, before the Bible millions of donkeys were walking off cliffs because the jokers on um would fall asleep at the reins. Do unto others was rule number one of the first DMV.