<< "I am the Way and the Truth and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." >>
the problem with that is that the interpretation is equally valid from many opposing viewpoints.
"Through Me" can mean through my teachings and more importantly through living my life. Or it can mean following the life exactly, or following some points only. Or it can mean the traditionally accepted meaning of accepting Jesus as the son of God and thus seeing Him as an intermediary.
Or, to an academic, it can mean dropping all false pretense and cultural biases in favor of pursuing a pure form of living bases on psychological influences between oneself and the world. To some, Jesus is in nature since He rose to the heavens so he must be up above and below, since he overcame traditional bounds of death and gravity; those worship through nature.
You see the problem created by cultural influences? We all see the world through a lens. That lens is composed of our ideas, experienses, and mostimportantly those cultural norms we acquired from birth to adulthood. Those norms serve as a part of conscience and perception.
Now consider whether that passage implies that organized Christianity, as defined by westerners is the true meaning. If it is through Him, then can not a personal relationship be equally as rewarding if full doctrine is followed?
The argument of course if that Jesus set an example by gathering people and that community is important. I never devalued community. I devalued a particular time and place for gathering with other people.
That was established to create order, which is not a spiritual occurence but a social and cultural one.
The problem is that spirituality, meaning, culture, human nature, and perception are all so intertwined, deciphering the true intent without using our "lens" is nearly impossible and thus all action by humans is subject to skepticism and question.
And to answer the question of the topic, define "practicing. What exactly does "practicing" consist of? Ritual and worship? Experiences of altered perception? Agreement with all the rules of a particular ideology? Or agreement with "the spirit of the law" of a particular value system? See, even though your statement can be interpreted as any of those, are they all right? If they are, then we are all right. If just one is right, what makes the others wrong since they can lead to the same outcome?
The price of admission is hardly worth the quibble.
The value is all in the journey.
[edit] wow I like that. It's going in my sig.[/edit]