if Olds posted a thread to a link that he thought was funny....

[rudeguy]

would Olds' law apply?

 

[Locut0s]

Don't see why not. Nothing in Old's law makes any assumption about the poster 😛

 

[Nik]

I bet you the entire fucking forum would erupt in comments about how his funny wasn't funny at all.

 

[olds]

I bet you the entire fucking forum would erupt in comments about how his funny wasn't funny at all.

This

 

[rudeguy]

I bet you the entire fucking forum would erupt in comments about how his funny wasn't funny at all.

or it could possibly cause a rift in the space-nef continuum.....

 

[Jeeebus]

or it could possibly cause a rift in the space-nef continuum.....

it would spurn some kind of opposites world? Like, where Nik's panties aren't wound up tighter than a vice?

 

[JJChicken]

it would spurn some kind of opposites world? Like, where Nik's panties aren't wound up tighter than a vice?

And dNor and LoKe are forum admins?

 

[Nik]

it would spurn some kind of opposites world? Like, where Nik's panties aren't wound up tighter than a vice?

what if I'm not wearing any? 😱

I gave them back to your mother.

 

[MAKENITO]

^^Hahahahahahahaha

Sooo.. whats Olds' law again?

 

[Locut0s]

^^Hahahahahahahaha

Sooo.. whats Olds' law again?

If the poster mentions that his thread is going to be funny in the title then Old's law says it won't be.

 

[Nik]

^^Hahahahahahahaha

Sooo.. whats Olds' law again?

If a thread title (or original poster) says something's funny, it's not.

 

[MotF Bane]

And dNor and LoKe are forum admins?

I, for one, welcome our horse semen sipping and forum security exploiting admins.

 

[pontifex]

I bet you the entire fucking forum would erupt in comments about how his funny wasn't funny at all.

really? I'd guess the opposite. people seem to love to kiss his ass

 

[MAKENITO]

Thanks guys!

I, for one, welcome our horse semen sipping and forum security exploiting admins.

:thumbsup:😀

 

[Locut0s]

really? I'd guess the opposite. people seem to love to kiss his ass

You are mistaking "love" with "quiver in ones boots in fear". :awe:

 

[thejackal1]

understandable

 

[DrPizza]

You're forgetting the first axiom on which all of Oldsmoboat's laws are based: Oldsmoboat is never wrong. Now, if he were to post a thread with "funny" in it, that would lead to a contradiction. But, if he attempted to do so, it would take down the entire internet because Nature abhors contradictions.

 

[blurredvision]

Olds isn't a nice person, so I'm pretty sure his stupid "law" never applied in the first place.

 

[BoomerD]

You're forgetting the first axiom on which all of Oldsmoboat's laws are based: Oldsmoboat is never wrong. Now, if he were to post a thread with "funny" in it, that would lead to a contradiction. But, if he attempted to do so, it would take down the entire internet because Nature abhors contradictions.

This explains it all.

Should Oldsmoboat post a "funny" thread title...and someone didn't find the content to be funny...the fail would be on that poster, NOT on Oldsmoboat, because, as the good Doctor Pizza already pointed out, Oldsmoboat is NEVER wrong.
If Olds says it's funny...it's funny even if the funny is not found by others.

 

[olds]

Olds isn't a nice person, so I'm pretty sure his stupid "law" never applied in the first place.

I actually am a nice person. I am just not afraid to call a douche a douche.
I also don't like idiots. Or dweebs. Or metrosexuals. Or asswipes. Or people walking on my lawn.

 

[Pegun]

I would like to think Olds would have more common sense than to say something is funny. He's one of the few around here that knows "funny" is a matter of opinion and what is hilarious to some is the dumbest sh!t some of us have ever heard.

 

[BudAshes]

Someone should spoof his name/avatar and then try it.

 

[olds]

Someone should spoof his name/avatar and then try it.

MotionMan might try it.