If Obama is involved with the Chicago mess....

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,627
54,579
136
Originally posted by: ScottMac
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: L00PY
*snip*

The problem is with the poster himself. He's not trying to figure out if Obama is corrupt/dirty/whatever. He already knows. Nothing you can say to him will change his mind, because Obama's already guilty.

Glad to see that you finally got the point. He's just another piece of crap Chicago Machine politician.

Tapping my meter here, you do realize I was pointing out your ridiculous and blind belief in Obama's guilt with absolutely no evidence, right? I was mocking you.

Why is it the people who accuse everyone else of being Kool Aid drinkers are the people who cling the most desperately to whatever conspiratorial fantasy suits them?
 

cliftonite

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2001
6,899
63
91
Originally posted by: ScottMac
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: L00PY
*snip*

The problem is with the poster himself. He's not trying to figure out if Obama is corrupt/dirty/whatever. He already knows. Nothing you can say to him will change his mind, because Obama's already guilty.

Glad to see that you finally got the point. He's just another piece of crap Chicago Machine politician.

Will still be better than the President we have had for the past 8 years.
 

cliftonite

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2001
6,899
63
91
Originally posted by: ScottMac
Originally posted by: L00PY
Originally posted by: ScottMac
Well, swell! His neighborhood is your neighborhood. Great, what's he done of merit? You're right there, you'd know. That was the root of the question, how did someone grow up politically in Chicago and not suck up and do the Machine's bidding?
He apparently did enough to win the presidential election. And by a large margin. How does someone grow up and not be sucked in? Apparently by doing what Obama did.

OK, so you also apparently cannot enumerate any significant actions of merit ... just "Well, he got elected" - he got elected by virtue of an extremely favorable press and a majority of Kool Aid drinkers, many of which, apparently including you, that cannot come up with anything significant that he's ever accomplished.


He's a gutless piece of Machine crap, and has never stood against Da Machine in any significant way. This is not consistent with his PR as The Great Reformer.

He endorsed Todd (Toad, Toddler, Erkel) Stroeger, absolutely nothing but a Machine puppet.
Neither of which are crimes or even unethical. Believe it or not, democrats tend to endorse democrats. Hardly indicative of corruption. It wouldn't surprise me if Bush endorsed a Chicago candidate at some point. Would that automatically make him a piece of the Machine too?

The alternate, Forrest Claypool is also a Democrat. Instead of picking a reformer (Democrat, Claypool), he endorsed an Idiot, Democrat, Stroeger ... it is not the choice of a "reformer" BHO is a Machine Guy all the way, not the "reformer" his fans try to make him out to be..

He's got Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod for bookends, both are long-time ramrods in the Daley machine. Not the choice of a Daley outsider. They may not be golfing buddies, but Daley / Obama are tied at the political hip. Recent history is scattered with people that don't necessarily like each other, but find a little beneficial mutual back-scratching in their interest.
Again, using staff that have been with you from the beginning is neither a crime nor unethical. You also fail to point out the connection between this Chicago corruption and Gates? Or the Daley machine and Shinseki or Jones? Aside for being democrats, how do those senators and governors tie in?

I see. So that fact that he selected a couple people that AREN'T machine candidates somehow proves he's not a part of The Machine? HE's added a couple more since ... glad to see he's got Arne now too, another piece of Daley fluff. Rahm and David are both well-connected guys, so are Arne and LaHood. Check out Jimmy Deleo and Bill Cellini[... Da Guys behind Da Guys/B]

I never claimed "insider" status, I claimed "constituent" status and as a direct observer have not seen any significant action other then the effort he makes to vote "present" on controversial issues (like the Born Alive Act). He is truly a gutless politician of the worst sort (in my opinion as a constituent).
Sorry to sound like a broken record, but your having an negative opinion as a constituent of Obama is neither a crime on his part nor indicative of corruption. You've failed to list any crimes nor any proof of corruption on Obama's part. Yet you want us to believe you based on your direct observations of nothing criminal nor unethical.

Why did nationwide vetting by the press, the Democratic party, the Republican party, and the internet masses fail to turn up evidence of Obama being a yet another corrupt criminal cog in the Chicago political machine? Had these general charges come up before he was a known national figure, they might be worthy of some scrutiny. As is, they're just laughable as the rants of the tinfoil hat brigade or sore losers.


Choosing to overlook what is apparent/obvious to a casual observer is one of the hallmarks of the BHO supporter.

I said early on that we'd just have to wait & see (not like we have a choice at this point), if he does well, good for him. My point is that he's not the squeaky clean Kennedy/Lincoln incarnate that his fans and the press are trying to make him out to be. He's pure Chicago Machine and right down there with Blago ... who is the rule, rather than the exception, for Chicago Politics.




Yet you cant offer any proof of wrongdoing by him. Just guilt by association.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: ScottMac
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: L00PY
*snip*

The problem is with the poster himself. He's not trying to figure out if Obama is corrupt/dirty/whatever. He already knows. Nothing you can say to him will change his mind, because Obama's already guilty.

Glad to see that you finally got the point. He's just another piece of crap Chicago Machine politician.

Tapping my meter here, you do realize I was pointing out your ridiculous and blind belief in Obama's guilt with absolutely no evidence, right? I was mocking you.

Why is it the people who accuse everyone else of being Kool Aid drinkers are the people who cling the most desperately to whatever conspiratorial fantasy suits them?

I think he even has Chicago machine macros. His arguments or lack thereof are laughable at best, especially when painting Obama with the same shit stained brush. IMO he should stick to networking.