• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

If morality can be ensured by a neural implant, would you consider it?

If a neural implant can make us moral....

  • Yes, I'm in favor of it being applied across a society including myself

  • Yes, I would choose to be implanted with this device

  • Yes, but only for convicted criminals

  • Yes, but only for criminals and people in positions of power and trust

  • No, such a device will make us less than human

  • No, this device in itself is immoral

  • No, this device shall cause its users to suffer from an unfair disadvantage

  • It should be mandatory for everyone, but me.

Results are only viewable after voting.
Braznor

Braznor

Diamond Member
Say in the future, a neural implant can make people moral. This miraculous device can ensure anyone implanted with one will never even consider the thought, much less deeds involving selfishness, wicked or even insane. Then should such a device be made mandatory for all people in a society or even a limited subset? Do you consider the use of this device itself to be moral? Or is freewill or even the illusion of it is essential for us to remain human i.e. with this device, we might very well become machines?

Vote and give your reasons.

Edit: From the few posts below, assume a consensus on morality can be achieved as per the individual society in the form of a constitution, a religious book etc.
 
Last edited:
I would vote no...
I would hesitate to let anything make decisions for me. But how could we possibly program a machine to make moral decisions when we as humans are still defining morality?
 
People are already moral in the sense that they are moral agents with moral beliefs. Everyone just has their own morality.
 
Your position - "This miraculous device can ensure anyone implanted with one will never even consider the thought, much less deeds involving selfishness," is... I don't even know how to put it in words, except to say that such a device would backfire and destroy society.
 
The people who "need" something like this the most typically aren't acting based on moral factors or selfishness. A schizophrenic or psychopathic person who would commit atrocities often think what they're doing IS moral or even commendable (e.g. God told me to kill the martian on the corner) and would pass the police at elbow test.
 
Braznor said:
Say in the future, a neural implant can make people moral. This miraculous device can ensure anyone implanted with one will never even consider the thought, much less deeds involving selfishness, wicked or even insane. Then should such a device be made mandatory for all people in a society or even a limited subset? Do you consider the use of this device itself to be moral? Or is freewill or even the illusion of it is essential for us to remain human i.e. with this device, we might very well become machines?

Vote and give your reasons.

Edit: From the few posts below, assume a consensus on morality can be achieved as per the individual society in the form of a constitution, a religious book etc.
Click to expand...

fuck. that.
 
Bad idea.

tumblr_mbyr1epCuv1qj0bt2o2_250.gif
 
A device like that should only be mandatory for people who are in a position of power over others. For example, politicians, managers, supervisors, investors, etc. So, it will never happen.
 
No, because morality isn't universal. Plus you can't define what is selfish. If I want more money to provide a better life for my family, am I selfish because that means a better life for me as well, or is it noble because I'm trying to do right by my family?

The question falls apart because nothing you describe is black or white, it's all interpretation.
 
If you could remove a person's humanity to instill "morality".
Don't we call that a lobotomy? Already available as an "option".
 
DrPizza said:
Your position - "This miraculous device can ensure anyone implanted with one will never even consider the thought, much less deeds involving selfishness," is... I don't even know how to put it in words, except to say that such a device would backfire and destroy society.
Click to expand...
It might at least result in a new one afterward. It's effectively new brain firmware. Format & reinstall.

Not that the current society would relish such a thought...



We generally value individual freedom of choice. Animals typically don't like to feel trapped, and we're no different.
Trying to take away that ability via a neural implant would likely cause some ancient instinct to freak out.
 
Last edited:
Have you seen Clockwork Orange? The main character is brainwashed to acheive an effect much like you describe and he suffers at the hands of everyone around him as they take advantage of him.
 
Here's another vote for that being a terrible idea. On the other hand I'd sign up for a hivemind, as long as a majority of the people I'm joining aren't idiots.
 
gorcorps said:
No, because morality isn't universal. Plus you can't define what is selfish. If I want more money to provide a better life for my family, am I selfish because that means a better life for me as well, or is it noble because I'm trying to do right by my family?

The question falls apart because nothing you describe is black or white, it's all interpretation.
Click to expand...
Don't worry - as soon as a legitimate charity comes to your door and points out that some poor children in some other country don't have as much money or food as your family, you'll give the excess money away. To not even the playing field and have a financial advantage over those poor people would be being selfish.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top