- May 16, 2005
- 272
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: russell2002
Well I dont get everything then. The speed my comps runs at seems no faster than my old p3 450. And both ran 2000.
I'm not sure I ever knew the size cache in that particular AMD cpu. I have still a K6-2/500 here, though. It's not running just now, however. Be that as it may, I believe the XP's have a lot more, and much faster, cache in them, with lots better internal algorithms built-in for using that extra cache. I think you would be able to sense the improvement just via that one difference.Originally posted by: russell2002
If I could run my AMD XP2400 at 233MHZ
Would it run faster or slower than a K6 233.
Originally posted by: russell2002
If I could run my AMD XP2400 at 233MHZ
Would it run faster or slower than a K6 233.
