zinfamous
No Lifer
yes, supposedly we dont use a large percentage > 80%? of what we have
that's 95% BS, though.
as for OP:
it all depends on body size:brain mass and, well, more importantly, which part of our brain is most developed.
yes, supposedly we dont use a large percentage > 80%? of what we have
Human intelligence such as emotions, self-awareness, advanced math and science? Most likely yes. Basic reasoning, problem solving and survival? Not so much. Rats can accomplish this. Also, some creatures manage to exceed the sum of their parts via a hive mind mentality and display amazing resourcefulness (see bees and ants) and logic which you wouldn't think possible given their microscopic brains. That's just plain alien to me.
Based on this hypothesis, People under 4 ft tall are less intelligent than people over 6ft....
I think the fact that the OP put "Intelligent" in speech marks says everything about this thread.
No. Small things get eaten by big things and therefore don't live long; there are no smart short-lived things. I assure you, it's science.
Wrong sir, a parrot is 3x times more intelligent than an ostricht.
Wrong sir, a parrot is 3x times more intelligent than an ostricht.
Midgets have similar sized heads and about equal mass in brains than normal people.
After millennia of battle the surviving G'Gugvuntt and Vl'hurg realised what had actually happened, and joined forces to attack the Milky Way in retaliation. They crossed vast reaches of space in a journey lasting thousands of years before reaching their target where they attacked the first planet they encountered, Earth. Due to a terrible miscalculation of scale the entire battle fleet was swallowed by a small dog.