• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

If everyone obeyed "don't drink before you drive" how would it affect alcohol sales?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
The law at this point sees context. .08 or under is not legally intoxicated, if you are a CDL holder, I believe it's .04....which takes context to the next level
 
The law at this point sees context. .08 or under is not legally intoxicated

Most states have at least two levels. Where I am, the 0.08% level is called DUI ("under the influence"), and 0.05% is called DWAI ("while ability impaired"). Terminology varies quite a bit, but 0.05% for a typical 180 pound person is achieved by walking past a bar with patrons drinking on the patio.
 
The law at this point sees context. .08 or under is not legally intoxicated, if you are a CDL holder, I believe it's .04....which takes context to the next level


I maintained a Class A CDL for over 30 years. The .04 restriction was only applicable when driving a vehicle that required a CDL... .08 applied in my personal vehicle.
 
And then there's something like 0.02% for drivers under 21. It's all totally arbitrary. Numbers plucked from someone's ass.
 
I feel there should be two separate penalties for DUI.

1: Going over the limit, but still driving ok. That should be like a speeding ticket. And have the cop follow you home to make sure you're not going anywhere else.

2: Being actual real drunk and being all over the road. This should be a loss of license and a huge fine, maybe even jail time depending how bad it is.

Same for using cell phone. Using a cellphone at a stop light should not be the same penalty as someone using it while driving and actually being a danger. The problem with the law system is that there's no common sense used it's just black or white.
Do you really know anyone that got in trouble for using a phone at a stop light?
 
Do you really know anyone that got in trouble for using a phone at a stop light?
In Ontario it's a stiff penalty, even at a stop light.
Drivers with A to G licences
If you have an A, B, C, D, E, F and/or G licence, you’ll face bigger penalties when convicted of distracted driving:

  • a fine of $490, if settled out of court (includes a victim surcharge and the court fee)
  • a fine of up to $1,000 if a summons is received or if you fight the ticket in court and lose
  • three demerit points
Novice drivers
If you hold a G1, G2, M1 or M2 licence, and are convicted of distracted driving, you’ll face the same fines as drivers with A to G licences. But you won’t receive any demerit points.

Instead of demerit points you’ll face:

  • a 30-day licence suspension for a first conviction
  • a 90-day licence suspension for a second conviction
  • cancellation of your licence and removal from the Graduated Licensing System (GLS) for a third conviction
    • to get your licence back you’d have to redo the GLS program
 
I was ticketed in CT for using a handheld device, I was at a stop light talking on the phone. Gotta be hands free

In MA, it's still OK to talk, not text, on the phone, >21yo
 
The legal limit used to be 0.10% but apparently cops thought some people seemed impaired but their BAC was between 0.08% and 0.10% so they got the law changed so the 0.08% limit is based on real world observations.
 
Back
Top