• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

If Ebola goes airborne...

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Must be rangers then.

..
Exactly...
Congratulations Highland,
You have just demonstrated that you do not understand what the technical scientific definition of "not airborne" is. You should look it up.

The CDC is using that definition every time they say "not airborne". The CDC knows that laypeople such as yourself do not have a clue what they are technically saying when they use the phrase "not airborne".

Flu viruses are technically not airborne
Your retort was about small droplets containing virus. That is NOT TECHNICALLY AIRBORNE. The infectious virus is in fluid such as saliva... not the air.

Replace flu viruses with Ebola and now you understand the difference between not airborne for flu vs not airborne forEbola... which is to say that there isn't one
 
We can almost rule it out. There are many older viruses that haven't gone airborne and they are more common than ebola. This ebola thing is a real ratings machine, so going airborne will be talked about, and since we're talking about it, yeah, it would kill millions if that happened.
 
Oh shut the hell up with the damn facts. This is a paranoia tinfoil hat thread.

I got some tinfoil fodder: what if ebola was genetically engineered and then released in africa as a test environment before going to production (first world countries). /JesseVenturavoice
 
1368541368-outbreak-dustin-hoffman.jpg
 
Back
Top