If Bush was found to have ordered the 9/11 attacks, would you still vote for him come November?

[Darkhawk28]

Well, would ya?

 

[CrazyHelloDeli]

Dumbest post ever, and coming from me that means alot.

 

[nick1985]

im sure the liberals on this board will condemn this post as flame bait

 

[Darkhawk28]

Why? Cyclowizard has already stated he would still vote for him. Not silly at all.

 

[Sternfan]

How much did you drink tonight, no really how much?

 

[sandorski]

lock!

 

[sandorski]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
Why? Cyclowizard has already stated he would still vote for him. Not silly at all.

Really? Link would be nice, if he did that's a pretty stupid thing to say.

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
The saddest thing to me is IF, big if, but IF George W. Bush did indeed order the attacks on 9/11, I would have to guess that nearly half of his supporters would STILL vote for him in November.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cyclo's response:

I would be one of them. There's only one thing that could be worse, and it's the reason that I'm not voting for Kerry now.



Cyclowizard's response

 

[Falstaff]

Originally posted by: Commiehawk28
Well, would ya?

A sad weak leftist propagandist such as yourself should watch Farenheit 911 and then go suck a barrel. Try not to make a mess; do it right and preferrably under a bridge or somewhere you will not be found for a while.

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: Falstaff

Originally posted by: Commiehawk28
Well, would ya?

A sad weak leftist propagandist such as yourself should watch Farenheit 911 and then go suck a barrel. Try not to make a mess; do it right and preferrably under a bridge or somewhere you will not be found for a while.

Considering the vote is 3 votes for still voting for Bush and 0 votes for throwing him in jail, I'd say the question is more valid than I thought.

This is a good litmus test to see how far partisanship goes.

 

[ntdz]

i voted no, i assume the people voting yes are liberals trying to make conservatives look bad...

 

[Sternfan]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: Falstaff

Originally posted by: Commiehawk28
Well, would ya?

A sad weak leftist propagandist such as yourself should watch Farenheit 911 and then go suck a barrel. Try not to make a mess; do it right and preferrably under a bridge or somewhere you will not be found for a while.

Considering the vote is 3 votes for still voting for Bush and 0 votes for throwing him in jail, I'd say the question is more valid than I thought.

Do you really believe people are being serious when voting? Take another hit of the bong dude or better yet get a clue.

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: ntdz
i voted no, i assume the people voting yes are liberals trying to make conservatives look bad...

That's fine. Just trying to see if there's a limit to party loyalty. I only brought this up because I was curious as to just how many here in this forum shares the same thought as Cyclo does.

 

[CycloWizard]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: ntdz
i voted no, i assume the people voting yes are liberals trying to make conservatives look bad...

That's fine. Just trying to see if there's a limit to party loyalty. I only brought this up because I was curious as to just how many here in this forum shares the same thought as Cyclo does.

Ah, the dreaded strawman rears its ugly head. Sad.

I'm a registered independent and would, indeed, vote for Kerry even if Bush were innocent if not for the subject that I mentioned. But believe what you will, I suppose.

 

[Taggart]

This thread just makes me sad. You should seek counseling if you truly think a group of people would still support a candidate gullty of murder.

 

[Mockery]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: Falstaff

Originally posted by: Commiehawk28
Well, would ya?

A sad weak leftist propagandist such as yourself should watch Farenheit 911 and then go suck a barrel. Try not to make a mess; do it right and preferrably under a bridge or somewhere you will not be found for a while.

Considering the vote is 3 votes for still voting for Bush and 0 votes for throwing him in jail, I'd say the question is more valid than I thought.

This is a good litmus test to see how far partisanship goes.

I wonder how many non-Bush supporters could be tainting this scientific poll....:-|

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: CycloWizard

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: ntdz
i voted no, i assume the people voting yes are liberals trying to make conservatives look bad...

That's fine. Just trying to see if there's a limit to party loyalty. I only brought this up because I was curious as to just how many here in this forum shares the same thought as Cyclo does.

Ah, the dreaded strawman rears its ugly head. Sad.

I'm a registered independent and would, indeed, vote for Kerry even if Bush were innocent if not for the subject that I mentioned. But believe what you will, I suppose.

You're the one dodging the focus of my argument...

You would vote for Bush even if he ordered the attacks.... that's what's truly sad. I could accept if you voted for a third party candidate, that's cool. But to say you'd still vote for Bush in this hypothetical scanario is just scary.

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: Taggart
This thread just makes me sad. You should seek counseling if you truly think a group of people would still support a candidate gullty of murder.

Why? Cyclo does... that stunned me that he would admit to it. Therefore, the poll was created.

Do I think Bush did order the 9/11 attacks? Oh, f no. That's silly.

 

[sandorski]

Originally posted by: CycloWizard

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: ntdz
i voted no, i assume the people voting yes are liberals trying to make conservatives look bad...

That's fine. Just trying to see if there's a limit to party loyalty. I only brought this up because I was curious as to just how many here in this forum shares the same thought as Cyclo does.

Ah, the dreaded strawman rears its ugly head. Sad.

I'm a registered independent and would, indeed, vote for Kerry even if Bush were innocent if not for the subject that I mentioned. But believe what you will, I suppose.

Even with the subject you brought up, what you said you'd do would be colossaly stupid. Bush(or any President to do so) should be tried for Treason under such circumstancesn not supported because Kerry supports Abortion. WTF? :|

 

[wkabel23]

Originally posted by: CycloWizard

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: ntdz
i voted no, i assume the people voting yes are liberals trying to make conservatives look bad...

That's fine. Just trying to see if there's a limit to party loyalty. I only brought this up because I was curious as to just how many here in this forum shares the same thought as Cyclo does.

Ah, the dreaded strawman rears its ugly head. Sad.

I'm a registered independent and would, indeed, vote for Kerry even if Bush were innocent if not for the subject that I mentioned. But believe what you will, I suppose.

Bahahaahahaha and so is Bill O'Reilly :laugh:

Also this thread is ridiculous, I'm pretty sure if Bush was found to be responsible for 9/11 he wouldn't be running for re-election.......

 

[CocoMunkee]

How about a fourth choice: I'm just a Moore-on liberal with an axe to grind and have nothing better to do than make an outrageous poll since my weak ass Dem nominee aint worth a damn.

 

[sandorski]

I still think this thread should be locked. Just because someone said something stupid in another thread about some off the wall "possibility", doesn't a thread make.

 

[umbrella39]

Originally posted by: sandorski
I still think this thread should be locked. Just because someone said something stupid in another thread about some off the wall "possibility", doesn't a thread make.

:thumbsup:

 

[Darkhawk28]

Originally posted by: wkabel23

Originally posted by: CycloWizard

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28

Originally posted by: ntdz
i voted no, i assume the people voting yes are liberals trying to make conservatives look bad...

That's fine. Just trying to see if there's a limit to party loyalty. I only brought this up because I was curious as to just how many here in this forum shares the same thought as Cyclo does.

Ah, the dreaded strawman rears its ugly head. Sad.

I'm a registered independent and would, indeed, vote for Kerry even if Bush were innocent if not for the subject that I mentioned. But believe what you will, I suppose.

Bahahaahahaha and so is Bill O'Reilly :laugh:

Also this thread is ridiculous, I'm pretty sure if Bush was found to be responsible for 9/11 he wouldn't be running for re-election.......

Of course this thread is ridiculous. But what's even more ridiculous is the notion that there are people out there that would still support Bush in this regard.

 

[CycloWizard]

Originally posted by: Darkhawk28
You're the one dodging the focus of my argument...

You would vote for Bush even if he ordered the attacks.... that's what's truly sad. I could accept if you voted for a third party candidate, that's cool. But to say you'd still vote for Bush in this hypothetical scanario is just scary.

Voting for a third party candidate instead of Bush is just like a vote for Kerry, just as a liberal voting for Nader is the same as a vote for Bush.

Look, no one is more sorry than I am that 3,000 people died on 9/11. I've lost friends and family in the military since, and I've come to realize that most of it probably isn't justified. However, I know for a fact that abortion isn't justified, and is occurring at a much greater rate than our soldiers or civilians dying. You likely didn't even read the entire scope of what Hilton was saying - that the PNAC is trying to establish a world totalitarian empire, but I would rather live in a totalitarian state where abortion is illegal than live in a democracy where it is legal. You can mock my position all you want, but I'll stand by it because it's the right thing to do.