If Bush lost...

[3chordcharlie]

Originally posted by: daniel1113

Originally posted by: phillyTIM
No. Bush STOLE the 2000 Election by cohersing the Supreme Court with $ and Bush's Brother's Regime in Florida.

Proof? Link? Document trail? Anything?

see above for you, too.

There's tonnes of evidence that the election was tampered. But it doesn't matter now.

 

[daniel1113]

Originally posted by: daniel1113

Originally posted by: phillyTIM
No. Bush STOLE the 2000 Election by cohersing the Supreme Court with $ and Bush's Brother's Regime in Florida.

Proof? Link? Document trail? Anything?

Edit: Oh, and regardless of how Bush won (or how YOU think he won) the election, he still won. So, your original post is still incorrect.

 

[daniel1113]

Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie

Originally posted by: daniel1113

Originally posted by: phillyTIM
No. Bush STOLE the 2000 Election by cohersing the Supreme Court with $ and Bush's Brother's Regime in Florida.

Proof? Link? Document trail? Anything?

see above for you, too.

There's tonnes of evidence that the election was tampered. But it doesn't matter now.

Tampered... of course. Stolen? There's no more proof that Bush stole the election than Gore tried to.

 

[3chordcharlie]

Originally posted by: daniel1113

Originally posted by: daniel1113

Originally posted by: phillyTIM
No. Bush STOLE the 2000 Election by cohersing the Supreme Court with $ and Bush's Brother's Regime in Florida.

Proof? Link? Document trail? Anything?

Edit: Oh, and regardless of how Bush won (or how YOU think he won) the election, he still won. So, your original post is still incorrect.

And yours is still facetious at best.

Time to move on. I suggest voting on tuesday.

 

[daniel1113]

Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie

Originally posted by: daniel1113

Originally posted by: daniel1113

Originally posted by: phillyTIM
No. Bush STOLE the 2000 Election by cohersing the Supreme Court with $ and Bush's Brother's Regime in Florida.

Proof? Link? Document trail? Anything?

Edit: Oh, and regardless of how Bush won (or how YOU think he won) the election, he still won. So, your original post is still incorrect.

And yours is still facetious at best.

Time to move on. I suggest voting on tuesday.

Incorrect, sir. Please read my above post.

Why vote on Tuesday when you could have sent in your vote weeks ago?

 

[3chordcharlie]

Originally posted by: daniel1113
Incorrect, sir. Please read my above post.

Why vote on Tuesday when you could have sent in your vote weeks ago?

Facetious at best, idiotic at worst - I figured you would grasp that.

I won't be voting because I'm not American. But I suspect I would vote on teh day of the election unless I was unable to do so.

The fact is it doesn't matter what happened in 2000, and it won't even matter what happens on tuesday; someone will be your new president. The chances that some form of fraud will influence, or appear to influence the outcome of the election are, once again, pretty high.

That's unfortunate; most of the world already has doubts about the veracity of your presidential election results. Hopefully come tuesday night we won't have a whole new set of reasons to do so.

 

[Perknose]

Unfortunately, I see the strong likelihood of a scenario in 2008 when the Republican nominee, whomever he is, will be well placed to succeed.

If John Kerry wins, he inherits a dog of a war he has pledged to continue, and a ballooning federal deficit that the Bush administration has had neither the integrity nor the guts to confront. Add to that the changing dynamics of the world economy (outsourcing as an insistent downward pressure on wages) that neither party could fully halt even if they tried, and an oppostional Republican controlled House and Senate, and the putative Kerry administration may not be well liked by 2008.

Does anyone seriously think that the social conservatives that comprise Bush's base would easily abandon their Shrub love? Hell, there's even nostalgia for Stalin in Russia and for Sadaam in Iraq amongst some groups there.

Still, I think GWB's active political shelf life will have expired, and it will be Jeb's turn. Jeb will look good by comparison (to his brother) to everyone disposed to so think, much as Bush the elder better fit my stalwart Republican Dad's idea of a statesman as compared to the amiable ex-actor Reagan.

 

[phillyTIM]

A BUSH will never again occupy the White House. Simple as that. They all have been exposed for the turkeys that they are and will never win another Election.

 

[daniel1113]

Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie

Originally posted by: daniel1113
Incorrect, sir. Please read my above post.

Why vote on Tuesday when you could have sent in your vote weeks ago?

Facetious at best, idiotic at worst - I figured you would grasp that.

I won't be voting because I'm not American. But I suspect I would vote on teh day of the election unless I was unable to do so.

The fact is it doesn't matter what happened in 2000, and it won't even matter what happens on tuesday; someone will be your new president. The chances that some form of fraud will influence, or appear to influence the outcome of the election are, once again, pretty high.

That's unfortunate; most of the world already has doubts about the veracity of your presidential election results. Hopefully come tuesday night we won't have a whole new set of reasons to do so.

Way to disagree with me by agreeing with me. It really is a shame the world feels that way... too bad I, along with most Americans, don't care about world opinion when it comes to our elections.

 

[3chordcharlie]

Originally posted by: daniel1113
Way to disagree with me by agreeing with me. It really is a shame the world feels that way... too bad I, along with most Americans, don't care about world opinion when it comes to our elections.

I agree that it doesn't matter what happened four years ago - but you shouldn't try to push that as a weak argument that 'proves' nothing wrong happened at that time, when there's a lot of evidence that something bad DID happen.

Not caring about world opinion is pretty arrogant; I'm sorry to hear that you feel that way. I would be embarrassed if my own government had the stink of illegitimacy clinging to it, but apparently that's just me.

 

[arsbanned]

Originally posted by: chrisms
If Bush lost in November, do you think he could get the Republican nomination again in 2008?

Fvck no, are you kidding? As if even the Republicans would be retarded enough to field his monkey ass again.

 

[arsbanned]

Originally posted by: TranceNation


He has a chance... if somehow the US was brainwashed into being extreme religious freaks or something like that.

We're already 1/2 way there, if you believe the polls.

 

[PELarson]

He ain't no Grover Cleveland! Besides the way the parties are run today you get one shot if you are lucky and then you are concind to the ran for President but didn't win safe, which is locked and dumped in the deepest hole possible.

 

[slyedog]

i dont think jeb bush would try it. not if his brother looses. but after four years of empty plans and
promises from kerry and with the UN flag flying on top of the capital and koffi,s office being in the white house, people will beg for john m. or rudi. just my thoughts.

 

[judasmachine]

aside from Bush bashing, once a president gets his walking papers, the party immediately finds someone else more charismatic, more electable. i think him and his brand of nationalist authortarianism will at least be put on a shelf for a while.

 

[jjzelinski]

Originally posted by: feralkid

Originally posted by: jjzelinski
Good god, not another one. I say neuter them all and put them out to stud.

How is that possible?

It's one or the other.

That's the point... I thought it was funny

<quietly dissappears...>