If all 50 states got into a war...

[ConstipatedVigilante]

Texas has a lot of people with guns. But Nevada does have Area 51, with whatever the fuck kind of death ray is there.

 

[dsity]

Texas.

bush was born here.

/thread

 

[amdhunter]

Originally posted by: CPA

Originally posted by: amdhunter

Originally posted by: BeauJangles
Hawaii. Who the fuck is going to mess with the Navy stationed at Pearl Harbor?

NYC can launch those fighter jets off of the Intrepid. We can do a surprise attack.

Where they going to get the fuel? <evil laugh> bwahahahahahaha </evil laugh>

It's NY...we can use hybrid jets. We have the intelligence to do it.

 

[Colt45]

NY, with CA/OR/WA and TX as autonomous regions

 

[indamixx99]

CA, we've got Aaahnuld

 

[mrSHEiK124]

Originally posted by: aphex
Definitely not us in FL....

Dude, we got CENTCOM and SOCOM at MacDill...and you really shouldn't underestimate all the TPT (trailer park trash). While the geezer population is overwhelming, quite a big chunk of them are war veterans.

 

[Gibson486]

Originally posted by: CPA
easy - Texas. We control the oil, we control the country! Plus, we have lots of people who have guns and aren't afraid to use them.

Well, judging from crime rates, cities in MA (ie Lowell, Lawrence, Springfield, etc) have people that have guns and are not afraid to use them either.

 

[SmoochyTX]

Originally posted by: amdhunter

Originally posted by: CPA

Originally posted by: amdhunter

Originally posted by: BeauJangles
Hawaii. Who the fuck is going to mess with the Navy stationed at Pearl Harbor?

NYC can launch those fighter jets off of the Intrepid. We can do a surprise attack.

Where they going to get the fuel? <evil laugh> bwahahahahahaha </evil laugh>

It's NY...we can use hybrid jets. We have the intelligence to do it.

:laugh:

 

[sash1]

Originally posted by: indamixx99
CA, we've got The Terminator

fixed

 

[Knight7]

lol even if we dont carry or use guns, im sure 90% of the people know how to use them here, and use it smart not like some backyard redneck, or a state full of hippies and feminine males (who are most likely afraid of blood), or a state with nukes that needs to call india for tech suport on how to turn on the computers to shoot it or washington DC to get the codes and permissions. that said i think NY would win it easy.


PS texas has the resources which would be taking over by NY, and the space to throw all the bodies out.

 

[nutxo]

Id vote for the states that have the missile siloes in em

 

[MotF Bane]

Texas. Shouldn't there be a poll for this?

 

[daniel1113]

Texas.

Didn't anyone watch Jericho?

 

[zinfamous]

Originally posted by: MrPickins

Originally posted by: CPA
easy - Texas. We control the oil, we control the country! Plus, we have lots of people who have guns and aren't afraid to use them.

:thumbsup:

People, resources and weapons. A winning combination.

CA has way more people, better-armed ghettos, and far, far more resources. Also, homeland advantage.

Texans couldn't handle the altitudes and winter weather of the Sierras. The economy far outstrips anything anything else in the US, so CA by a long shot.

 

[fstime]

Montana, or whatever state has the most cowboys.

 

[SmoochyTX]

Originally posted by: zinfamous

Originally posted by: MrPickins

Originally posted by: CPA
easy - Texas. We control the oil, we control the country! Plus, we have lots of people who have guns and aren't afraid to use them.

:thumbsup:

People, resources and weapons. A winning combination.

CA has way more people, better-armed ghettos, and far, far more resources. Also, homeland advantage.

Texans couldn't handle the altitudes and winter weather of the Sierras. The economy far outstrips anything anything else in the US, so CA by a long shot.

So you're saying the gangs in L.A. could handle the winter weather of the Sierras better? LOL

 

[Legendary]

CA has the most military bases, bases of all branches of the military, including a huge navy base. also, being west they can drop bombs anywhere to their east with little worry of jet stream

 

[Rufus12]

All the other states would forget that Vermont exists, and when all of you have gotten the big battles out of the way we'd swoop in with guerilla tactics and win. We'd be be like Al Queda in Afghanistan, hiding in the hills.
Hawaii and Alask probably have a better chance, because of their remote locations far from the lower 48.

 

[amdhunter]

Originally posted by: MotF Bane
Texas. Shouldn't there be a poll for this?

I would have added a poll, but I can't name all 57 states.

 

[zinfamous]

Originally posted by: SmoochyTX

Originally posted by: zinfamous

Originally posted by: MrPickins

Originally posted by: CPA
easy - Texas. We control the oil, we control the country! Plus, we have lots of people who have guns and aren't afraid to use them.

:thumbsup:

People, resources and weapons. A winning combination.

CA has way more people, better-armed ghettos, and far, far more resources. Also, homeland advantage.

Texans couldn't handle the altitudes and winter weather of the Sierras. The economy far outstrips anything anything else in the US, so CA by a long shot.

So you're saying the gangs in L.A. could handle the winter weather of the Sierras better? LOL

The point is that Texans would be stopped at the border and just turn around. Then, CA would launch a bunch of stoned hippy snowboarders strapped with explosives to take out the fleeing Texans.

Also, only steers and queers come from Texas :laugh:

 

[tfinch2]

Originally posted by: zinfamous
Texans couldn't handle the altitudes and winter weather of the Sierras. The economy far outstrips anything anything else in the US, so CA by a long shot.

Silly Californians. Like you could either?

http://www.somnaderi.com/misc/...nia_population_map.png

 

[SmoochyTX]

Originally posted by: zinfamous

Originally posted by: SmoochyTX

Originally posted by: zinfamous

Originally posted by: MrPickins

Originally posted by: CPA
easy - Texas. We control the oil, we control the country! Plus, we have lots of people who have guns and aren't afraid to use them.

:thumbsup:

People, resources and weapons. A winning combination.

CA has way more people, better-armed ghettos, and far, far more resources. Also, homeland advantage.

Texans couldn't handle the altitudes and winter weather of the Sierras. The economy far outstrips anything anything else in the US, so CA by a long shot.

So you're saying the gangs in L.A. could handle the winter weather of the Sierras better? LOL

The point is that Texans would be stopped at the border and just turn around. Then, CA would launch a bunch of stoned hippy snowboarders strapped with explosives to take out the fleeing Texans.

Also, only steers and queers come from Texas :laugh:

Never heard that one before! :roll:

Texans stopped at the border? You don't seriously think we'd attack from the north do you? We'd be too afraid of those stoned hippy snowboarders. :laugh:

 

[zinfamous]

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: zinfamous
Texans couldn't handle the altitudes and winter weather of the Sierras. The economy far outstrips anything anything else in the US, so CA by a long shot.

Silly Californians. Like you could either?

http://www.somnaderi.com/misc/...nia_population_map.png

hehe.

Yeah, but I spent 5 years in Chicago, and ski In Colorado. I can sure tolerate it longer than some worthless Texans could.

 

[amdhunter]

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: zinfamous
Texans couldn't handle the altitudes and winter weather of the Sierras. The economy far outstrips anything anything else in the US, so CA by a long shot.

Silly Californians. Like you could either?

http://www.somnaderi.com/misc/...nia_population_map.png

California would lose just by lighting a single tree on fire.

 

[Q]

Originally posted by: CPA
easy - Texas. We control the oil, we control the country! Plus, we have lots of people who have guns and aren't afraid to use them.

Yup but here in SC anyone can have a gun, I think we have the most loose gun laws in the country, IIRC