If a *Re-Vote* is called in Florida, Who do you think will win?

[Buddha Bart]

Personally, I think Gore will.
Nader supporters will cave and vote Gore, and whatever number of messed up ballots will be cast properly.

Unless there is a large conservative population that didn't bother to vote, but will understand the urgency now.

bart

 

[Shuxclams]

<< If a *Re-Vote* is called in Florida, Who do you think will win >>


Whoever gets the most votes.




SHUX

 

[juiio]

There will be no revote.

 

[desy]

It might turn out about the same.
They also project that cause the extreme west is in the central time zone and highly Republican may have been disuaded from voting as Gore had already been announced the winner from the exit polls.
I don't think the military votes from overseas have been included yet have they? They also would most likely be Republican.

 

[ride525]

Buddha,

I think you are right...there would be at least some Nader voters that would switch their vote for Gore....

 

[kranky]

New and improved ballot for a revote, approved for use by all Democrats as &quot;not confusing&quot;:

Please enter the single-digit number corresponding to the candidate you wish to vote for: ______

Bush _________ [ (3.5 * 7) + (1.4 * 6) + 0.1 ] / 11
Gore__________ 1
Buchanan______ [ ( 15 / 3 ) + 3 ]
Nader ________ [ ( 822 / 274 ) * 2 ]
Brown ________ 0
Hagelin ______ 2
Harris _______ 4
McReynolds ___ 5
Moorehead ____ 7
Phillips _____ 9

 

[Moving Target]

By how well they read the ballots last time, I would say Buchanan by a land slide!

 

[Optimus]

LOL! Kranky...

Or perhaps:

Bush _________ [ (3.5 * 7) + (1.4 * 6) + 0.1 ] / 11
Buchanan______ [ ( 15 / 3 ) + 3 ]
Nader ________ [ ( 822 / 274 ) * 2 ]
Gore__________ ANY OTHER NUMBER

Before I offend anyone, I'm not even involved in the election being from Canada, (eh?)
I just appreciated the Simpsons-esq humour in kranky's post.

(Hey, anyone with opposing views, just switch the names for your choice!)

 

[Entity]

LMAO@Kranky. Nice satire.

Rob

 

[somethingwitty]

<< They also project that... >>



whoever they are, I wouldnt put much stock in their words. &quot;THEY&quot; havent been right much recently