I would never be disrespectful about it, since I believe that most cops are good guys doing a difficult job. You can assert your rights without being a dick.
What's the legal difference that border crossing are able to search your car then?
What's the legal difference that border crossing are able to search your car then?
They don't...unless they believe they have probably cause.
"actually, officer, i do. i'm not trying to be a pain, but i'm kinda in a hurry and based on why you pulled me over, there's no probable cause for you to need to search my car, it would just kinda waste both of our valuable time. sorry."
What's the legal difference that border crossing are able to search your car then?
After the story about Mexican drug gangs hiding drugs in innocent people's cars, how confident can you be that you truly have nothing to hide?
You basically should always say yes, as cops quite often couldn't possibly care less about laws. I've mentioned before that I had a young co-worker from India that got pulled over in his Volvo in front of the PC shop we worked at, and he refused a search and got beat the fuck up for it. And he was like 110lbs soaking wet and obviously not a threat. Nothing quite like seeing a 300lb cop sit on his back while his neck was sideways on the curb. They tore his car to shreds too. When the store manager (middle-aged guy in a shirt and tie) went out to ask what this was regarding, one of the officers put his hand to his pistol. What fucking assholes, most cops are great, but I'd have been happy to see those particular fuckers get ran over by dump trucks.
You basically should always say yes, as cops quite often couldn't possibly care less about laws. I've mentioned before that I had a young co-worker from India that got pulled over in his Volvo in front of the PC shop we worked at, and he refused a search and got beat the fuck up for it. And he was like 110lbs soaking wet and obviously not a threat. Nothing quite like seeing a 300lb cop sit on his back while his neck was sideways on the curb. They tore his car to shreds too. When the store manager (middle-aged guy in a shirt and tie) went out to ask what this was regarding, one of the officers put his hand to his pistol. What fucking assholes, most cops are great, but I'd have been happy to see those particular fuckers get ran over by dump trucks.
Never consent and never talk without a lawyer present. You never have anything to gain.
1) While the officer is running your license get your phone out and prepare to record the rest of the interaction, if only the audio.
2) Alternately you can tell the officer the vehicle is equipped with hidden video and audio recording equipment in the front and rear of the vehicle that can only be turned off with an override key that is at your house.
and he didn't sue because???
Make sure to be familiar with your local laws. Recording audio without consent is generally a felony in NH.
and he didn't sue because???
if it happened like you say with witness and all seems open and shut case especially after they subpoena the cruiser cam.
Was circa '96 in Dallas. No idea why no lawsuit, perhaps the lawyers didn't think it would be a case with no video? This was back in the stone ages before video was out there helping to protect people more, and before several Police Chiefs that have considerably improved relations with the public (lots of bad apple officers fired, a few jailed, and more awards/etc for exemplary officers).
Out of curiosity what state and jurisdiction did this take place in?
You do realize that there is not a single defense attorney in the country who would agree with your statement that you should always say yes?
well you are basing "You basically should always say yes" off of a single instance over a decade ago. You should never say yes.
In a lot of states, the cop can sit in the drivers seat and search within his reach without probable cause.
I think your getting a little too complicated.
Just tell the cop "no, you may not search my car. If I give you a doughnut will you go away?"