yukichigai
Diamond Member
- Apr 23, 2003
- 6,404
- 0
- 76
Domo.Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: yukichigai
Lesse, ignoring the massive invasion of privacy, I'm sure this would work out great for situations where, say, some gang bangers start shooting at you and you're only able to hobble away at 25 miles per because of the limiter. Or you need to get to the hospital ASAP and don't have the time/money for an ambulance. Sure, you die from massive blood loss because you hit a school zone, but knowing that this technology has saved maybe 12 lives, tops, will be of great comfort as you slip off into the final black unknown.
In most accidents speed is a factor, not a cause. Idiot drivers are perfectly capable of taking out a school bus full of innocent children while doing the speed limit.
Not really an invasion of privacy, but I think this is a good argument against it.
By the way, here's another argument against it. From the report:
30 percent, as a contributing factor. Not the cause, but a contributing factor, which according to the definition they use includes any crashes where the driver was speeding at all, regardless of whether or not that was what actually did 'em in. Why does that matter? Well let's scroll down the report a bit, shall we?In 2004, speeding was a contributing factor in 30 percent of all fatal crashes.
Let's look at the average sobriety of the drivers involved in these crashes. Shocker, only 15% of the drivers in these fatal crashes were sober. If anything, that tells me we have more of a DUI problem than a speeding problem.
Speeding isn't the issue, it's drunk driving, distracted driving, or just being an asshole behind the wheel. Speeding is just the straw that breaks the camel's back in some instances. We should be spending all of this anti-speeding money cracking down on drunk drivers, something that would actually save lives. The statistics indicate that roughly 39% of all fatal crashes involve alcohol. (though again, they neglect to track "caused by alcohol") I'd go after the drunks rather than the speeders, especially since so many of the speeding-related fatalities involve alcohol.